You have already conceded the point.Yet you can't be bothered to address the argument. If its flaws were so obvious, I think you'd have been able to point them out by now. You haven't, so as I've said, I accept your concession.Im sorry there was no well founded or any other type of argument that you have made . You just make variations on the same meaningless assertions that defy reason.
Like the abrogation of one Quranic verse by another?Nothing is unequivocal .
It is abundantly evident that naskh occurs between separate scriptures rather than between them, though belief in internal naskh is still somewhat widespread and certainly doesn't constitute kufr.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1628053-post118.html
No there is reason to revisit any abrogation arguments again.