I get a kick that that's all they got. nothing more. we say here's our data, and they'll come back.....consensus, fk off. the only reason one would stoop so low is that one has zero data to back up one's argument. I am comfortable with my position, and I am positive they ain't got shit for data.I rest my case.well, never do we see any actual testing from the warmers, only the condescending comment of consensus!! We have consensus. They have that on a few scientists they chose to go to to get that consensus. What we want to see is their observation of fact to make that claim and when challenged for that material, all you get back is ...consensus. total bullshit. spit!!!!!
We have all the facts and consensus from actual scientists....you have a political belief that the Chinese cooked it up...
An intelligent post would have actually debated my comment by providing actual observed data, but instead did what I said they do. too funny
Consensus...what a laugh...which other branch of science offers up "consensus" as evidence that their mainstream hypothesis is correct? Answer...none. Any other branch of science bombards you with evidence upon evidence upon evidence in support of their hypothesis...not so with climate science...you get name calling and "consensus...
Go right ahead and try to refute all this...
Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
right here. we know for a fact the CO2 in the atmosphere was greater than 1000 PPM in the past. so to make any statement outside of that fact, leads one to a lie.