Mitt Romney Promises 'Millions' Of Jobs -- But Offers No Data To Back It Up

J.E.D

Gold Member
Jul 28, 2011
14,159
2,229
280
Mitt Romney Promises 'Millions' Of Jobs -- But Offers No Data To Back It Up

President Obama is seizing on a new think-tank study that says Romney's plan to cut tax rates for all brackets, lower the corporate rate, close loopholes and keep taxes low on investments, would require him to eliminate deductions and credits that benefit the lower- and middle-class, such as child credits and mortgage deductions.

The Romney campaign is not engaging on the same playing field. When asked Thursday in a conference call how much Rommey's plan might add to the deficit before the economic-growth it projected to create was factored in, along with closing loopholes and cutting spending, the campaign declined to provide specific numbers.

In a sense, the Romney campaign is handicapping itself, because Obama is now out on the campaign trail wielding specific numbers against Romney, whacking him over the head with lines like this: "The average middle-class family with children, according to this study, would be hit with a tax increase of more than $2,000."

"In order to afford just one $250,000 tax cut for somebody like Mr. Romney, 125 families like yours would have to pay another $2,000 in taxes each and every year," Obama told a crowd in Mansfield, Ohio, on Wednesday.

"Does that sound like a good plan for economic growth?" Obama asked the crowd, which screamed back, "No!"
 
Mitt Romney Promises 'Millions' Of Jobs -- But Offers No Data To Back It Up

President Obama is seizing on a new think-tank study that says Romney's plan to cut tax rates for all brackets, lower the corporate rate, close loopholes and keep taxes low on investments, would require him to eliminate deductions and credits that benefit the lower- and middle-class, such as child credits and mortgage deductions.

The Romney campaign is not engaging on the same playing field. When asked Thursday in a conference call how much Rommey's plan might add to the deficit before the economic-growth it projected to create was factored in, along with closing loopholes and cutting spending, the campaign declined to provide specific numbers.

In a sense, the Romney campaign is handicapping itself, because Obama is now out on the campaign trail wielding specific numbers against Romney, whacking him over the head with lines like this: "The average middle-class family with children, according to this study, would be hit with a tax increase of more than $2,000."

"In order to afford just one $250,000 tax cut for somebody like Mr. Romney, 125 families like yours would have to pay another $2,000 in taxes each and every year," Obama told a crowd in Mansfield, Ohio, on Wednesday.

"Does that sound like a good plan for economic growth?" Obama asked the crowd, which screamed back, "No!"

Obama's done so much damage to the economy its going to take Romney 3 terms to undo it
 
Obama's done so much damage to the economy its going to take Romney 3 terms to undo it

:lol::lol:

My god, I really think a 100 yrs from now posts like this will be studied by the then psychology students in the projection and mental illness classes.

no shit, not kidding

your brain is broken, stop embarrassing yourself for your own sake :lol::lol:
 
OMG, I love this stuff. All the data Obama gave us was wrong...stop with these pointless academic excercises.....lower taxes and lower spending.....it's not that hard.
 
Mitt Romney Promises 'Millions' Of Jobs -- But Offers No Data To Back It Up

President Obama is seizing on a new think-tank study that says Romney's plan to cut tax rates for all brackets, lower the corporate rate, close loopholes and keep taxes low on investments, would require him to eliminate deductions and credits that benefit the lower- and middle-class, such as child credits and mortgage deductions.

The Romney campaign is not engaging on the same playing field. When asked Thursday in a conference call how much Rommey's plan might add to the deficit before the economic-growth it projected to create was factored in, along with closing loopholes and cutting spending, the campaign declined to provide specific numbers.

In a sense, the Romney campaign is handicapping itself, because Obama is now out on the campaign trail wielding specific numbers against Romney, whacking him over the head with lines like this: "The average middle-class family with children, according to this study, would be hit with a tax increase of more than $2,000."

"In order to afford just one $250,000 tax cut for somebody like Mr. Romney, 125 families like yours would have to pay another $2,000 in taxes each and every year," Obama told a crowd in Mansfield, Ohio, on Wednesday.

"Does that sound like a good plan for economic growth?" Obama asked the crowd, which screamed back, "No!"

And what GROWTH has obama foisted BY his policies? A paultry 1.2 % GDP?

REALLY?

Wait until tomorrow when the new stats on UNEMPLOYMENT come out and make YOU and your defense of Obama look assinine to the extreme.

NO WHERE TO RUN TO YOSEF.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQRIOKvR2WM]Martha Reeves and the Vandellas- Nowhere to Run - YouTube[/ame]
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
HuffyPuffy...<yawn>

Where are all the jobs Barry promised in 2008?

Well, let's see. He's already surpassed Bush's job creation numbers; and it only took him 4 years, not the eight that Bush had. Oh, and he did it in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression.
 
HuffyPuffy...<yawn>

Where are all the jobs Barry promised in 2008?

Well, let's see. He's already surpassed Bush's job creation numbers; and it only took him 4 years, not the eight that Bush had. Oh, and he did it in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Obama is the biggest disaster since the FDR Depression
 
because Obama is now out on the campaign trail wielding specific numbers against Romney, whacking him over the head with lines like this: "The average middle-class family with children, according to this study, would be hit with a tax increase of more than $2,000."

Well, Obama has never lied to us before.
 
HuffyPuffy...<yawn>

Where are all the jobs Barry promised in 2008?

Well, let's see. He's already surpassed Bush's job creation numbers; and it only took him 4 years, not the eight that Bush had. Oh, and he did it in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Obama is the biggest disaster since the FDR Depression

Whatever he is, he has created more jobs than the previous POTUS.
 
Mitt Romney Promises 'Millions' Of Jobs -- But Offers No Data To Back It Up

President Obama is seizing on a new think-tank study that says Romney's plan to cut tax rates for all brackets, lower the corporate rate, close loopholes and keep taxes low on investments, would require him to eliminate deductions and credits that benefit the lower- and middle-class, such as child credits and mortgage deductions.

The Romney campaign is not engaging on the same playing field. When asked Thursday in a conference call how much Rommey's plan might add to the deficit before the economic-growth it projected to create was factored in, along with closing loopholes and cutting spending, the campaign declined to provide specific numbers.

In a sense, the Romney campaign is handicapping itself, because Obama is now out on the campaign trail wielding specific numbers against Romney, whacking him over the head with lines like this: "The average middle-class family with children, according to this study, would be hit with a tax increase of more than $2,000."

"In order to afford just one $250,000 tax cut for somebody like Mr. Romney, 125 families like yours would have to pay another $2,000 in taxes each and every year," Obama told a crowd in Mansfield, Ohio, on Wednesday.

"Does that sound like a good plan for economic growth?" Obama asked the crowd, which screamed back, "No!"

Obama's done so much damage to the economy its going to take Romney 3 terms to undo it

Bush did so much damage to the economy that it'll take Obama another year or too to finish cleaning up the mess.
 
Mitt Romney Promises 'Millions' Of Jobs -- But Offers No Data To Back It Up

President Obama is seizing on a new think-tank study that says Romney's plan to cut tax rates for all brackets, lower the corporate rate, close loopholes and keep taxes low on investments, would require him to eliminate deductions and credits that benefit the lower- and middle-class, such as child credits and mortgage deductions.

The Romney campaign is not engaging on the same playing field. When asked Thursday in a conference call how much Rommey's plan might add to the deficit before the economic-growth it projected to create was factored in, along with closing loopholes and cutting spending, the campaign declined to provide specific numbers.

In a sense, the Romney campaign is handicapping itself, because Obama is now out on the campaign trail wielding specific numbers against Romney, whacking him over the head with lines like this: "The average middle-class family with children, according to this study, would be hit with a tax increase of more than $2,000."

"In order to afford just one $250,000 tax cut for somebody like Mr. Romney, 125 families like yours would have to pay another $2,000 in taxes each and every year," Obama told a crowd in Mansfield, Ohio, on Wednesday.

"Does that sound like a good plan for economic growth?" Obama asked the crowd, which screamed back, "No!"

Obama's done so much damage to the economy its going to take Romney 3 terms to undo it

Bush did so much damage to the economy that it'll take Obama another year or too to finish cleaning up the mess.

Yeah, thanks for your help Obama, the grown ups will take over after November 2012
 
Last edited:
HuffyPuffy...<yawn>

Where are all the jobs Barry promised in 2008?

Well, let's see. He's already surpassed Bush's job creation numbers; and it only took him 4 years, not the eight that Bush had. Oh, and he did it in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Obama is the biggest disaster since the FDR Depression

The Depression hit over 3 years before Roosevelt took office in 1933. It was started by Hoover, and cleaned up by Roosevelt. You really are a clueless dweeb.
 
Obama promised millions of jobs but lost them instead. Maybe he should look at that data.
 
Well, let's see. He's already surpassed Bush's job creation numbers; and it only took him 4 years, not the eight that Bush had. Oh, and he did it in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Obama is the biggest disaster since the FDR Depression

The Depression hit over 3 years before Roosevelt took office in 1933. It was started by Hoover, and cleaned up by Roosevelt. You really are a clueless dweeb.

I think you got the names of the 2 Presidents right and little else.

The Depression was started when the Fed decided to collapse the US economy by sucking out 1/3 of the money supply and sit idly by while banks went belly up.

what year did FDR finally clean up the economy? Pick a number between 1933 and 1944
 
Well, let's see. He's already surpassed Bush's job creation numbers; and it only took him 4 years, not the eight that Bush had. Oh, and he did it in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Obama is the biggest disaster since the FDR Depression

Whatever he is, he has created more jobs than the previous POTUS.
oops...WHERE are they> WHY do you perpetuate a lie...and NO you may NOT post Government JOBS. Private Sector ONLY.:eusa_hand:
 

Forum List

Back
Top