Misplaced Trust Cost Thousands of American Lives

[PoliticalChic]

That's a misplaced trust in a President who was less than American at heart.
I'll get to that in a moment.



On this date, November 27 of 1944, Tokyo was firebombed.
Know why?
It's because of the President referenced above.



1.Perhaps you recall this slur of this President: “Trump's mental health and why people are discussing it….is he mentally fit for office?”
The debate over Trump's mental health

While the suggestion is absurd and bizarre, there is certainly cause to apply the query to another individual, a President whose….peculiarities…..arguably let to the deaths of multiple thousands of Americans.


Had Franklin Delano Roosevelt not had his attraction to, and affection for, the homicidal psychopath Joseph Stalin, there would not have been a nuclear Soviet Union, a Korean War, Vietnam, even a Red China, and a number of other proxy wars of America vs communism….nor, in fact, would the Soviet Union have survived World War II.

And I can prove every word herein.




2. Let’s begin with the only document the American people have agreed to be governed by: “Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution…The Constitution specifically defines what treason is which is making war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to our enemies, and it actually has a procedural element that treason has to be proven by the statements of two witnesses to an overt act or a confession.” Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution — here's why
On the technicality of having witnesses, Franklin Roosevelt may slither free, but in the court of pubic opinion….he was a traitor to the United States.


3. Right from the start…In opposition to America’s long standing policy, FDR made it one of his first executive endeavors to offer recognition to the blood-soaked Soviet Union. The Soviets promised to give up their stated plan of world-wide socialist governance, and to stop engendering upheaval in the United Stated.

Roosevelt’s own ambassador to Moscow warned him that they continued to do exactly what they promised to forego…..and FDR ignored him!





And….to make things easy for the communists, Roosevelt treated Soviet spies the way Obama treated illegal aliens…..encouraged and embraced them.




The individuals involved were Roosevelt, Stalin….and a deep cover Soviet spy made comfortable in FDR’s administration.



Now…..let’s set the stage with the major players in this pastiche: America, Russia, and Japan.

Just the slightest alteration in the actions of these players would have altered history... for the better.


I'll explain....and prove....where history went wrong.

 

[Cellblock2429]

That's a misplaced trust in a President who was less than American at heart.
I'll get to that in a moment.



On this date, November 27 of 1944, Tokyo was firebombed.
Know why?
It's because of the President referenced above.



1.Perhaps you recall this slur of this President: “Trump's mental health and why people are discussing it….is he mentally fit for office?”
The debate over Trump's mental health

While the suggestion is absurd and bizarre, there is certainly cause to apply the query to another individual, a President whose….peculiarities…..arguably let to the deaths of multiple thousands of Americans.


Had Franklin Delano Roosevelt not had his attraction to, and affection for, the homicidal psychopath Joseph Stalin, there would not have been a nuclear Soviet Union, a Korean War, Vietnam, even a Red China, and a number of other proxy wars of America vs communism….nor, in fact, would the Soviet Union have survived World War II.

And I can prove every word herein.




2. Let’s begin with the only document the American people have agreed to be governed by: “Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution…The Constitution specifically defines what treason is which is making war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to our enemies, and it actually has a procedural element that treason has to be proven by the statements of two witnesses to an overt act or a confession.” Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution — here's why
On the technicality of having witnesses, Franklin Roosevelt may slither free, but in the court of pubic opinion….he was a traitor to the United States.


3. Right from the start…In opposition to America’s long standing policy, FDR made it one of his first executive endeavors to offer recognition to the blood-soaked Soviet Union. The Soviets promised to give up their stated plan of world-wide socialist governance, and to stop engendering upheaval in the United Stated.

Roosevelt’s own ambassador to Moscow warned him that they continued to do exactly what they promised to forego…..and FDR ignored him!





And….to make things easy for the communists, Roosevelt treated Soviet spies the way Obama treated illegal aliens…..encouraged and embraced them.




The individuals involved were Roosevelt, Stalin….and a deep cover Soviet spy made comfortable in FDR’s administration.



Now…..let’s set the stage with the major players in this pastiche: America, Russia, and Japan.

Just the slightest alteration in the actions of these players would have altered history... for the better.


I'll explain....and prove....where history went wrong.

/----/ FDR was an opportunistic socialist who banged his cousin.
FDR's love nest in the park: How president took FIVE 'mistresses' to country getaway (including his distant COUSIN, publisher and wife's social secretary)

 

[K9Buck]

Are you saying that FDR knowingly helped the Soviet nuclear program?

 

[Taz]

She's saying that we should have never defended South Korea.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you saying that FDR knowingly helped the Soviet nuclear program?

I don't have to 'say' it.....the archives prove it.



. Hearings regarding shipment of atomic material to the Soviet Union during World War II. Hearings

No Results Page

Hearings regarding shipment of atomic material to the Soviet Union during World War II. (1950 edition) | Open Library.

Soviet atomic espionage





Major George Lacey Jordan started a diary in 1942 when, as liaison to Soviet officials receiving materiel via lend-lease, he grew suspicious about the nature of these airborne shipments from the US over the Arctic to the USSR.

Stationed at Great Falls, Montana, Major Jordan documented evidence that Americans high up within the FDR administration were providing the USSR with the raw materials, technology, equipment, and know-how to make atomic bombs. And this at a time when our own were still under development in supposed secrecy.

As catalogued in the diaries, all the materiel required for the creation of an atomic pile was transferred to the USSR as early as 1942. The materiel included ‘bomb powder’ (uranium oxide), graphite in numerous forms, cadmium, cobalt, thorium, and $13,000,000 worth of aluminum tubes.

Major Jordan did not get very far pressing his concerns with the powers that be. However, by 1944 his boss General Groves had learned of the plot and managed to put a stop to further shipments of atomic materials.

The full significance of these Lend-Lease shipments was not made clear to Major Jordan until February 1950 when he picked up a copy of Life magazine. Inside was an illustrated article on the atom bomb:

‘I learned for the first time that a plutonium pile consists of giant blocks of graphite, surrounded by heavy walls of concrete and honeycombed with aluminum tubes. In these tubes, it was related, are inserted slugs of natural uranium, containing one per cent of U-235. The intensity of the operation was declared to be governed by means of cadmium rods.’

So illuminating was this information that he carried this article with him during one of his appearances before the House Un-American Activities Committee.

Major Jordan’s observations were later published in the book:
From Major Jordan's Diaries
© 1952 by George Racey Jordan, USAF (Ret.)
with Richard L. Stokes
Originally published in 1952 by
Harcourt, Brace & Company, New York
Reprinted by American Opinion, 1961

Major Jordan’s Diaries – How Lend-Lease diverted Atomic Materials to the USSR

 

[PoliticalChic]

She's saying that we should have never defended South Korea.

Why would I ever need a sub-moron like you to pretend to understand what I post???

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. The major powers at the time were all about scooping up third world and less developed nations, to bring ‘civilization’ to them….and to ‘borrow’ their natural resources.



A proud, nay…arrogant…people, the Japanese, demanded a role in the new world order.
The aim and agenda of the Japanese was a mixture of nationalism and religion....not very different from that of the United States when the motto was "Manifest Destiny."

But Japan didn't have the materials to work with that we had.


In his Pearl Harbor novel, Newt Gingrich offers this conversation about Japan:

“England had its advantages when this new age started. We had mountainsides of coal, plenty of iron, the building blocks of empire. But by God, if ever there was a spot on earth not to start an empire from, its Japan. Smaller than Britain, not counting the frozen northern island of their, and yet half again the population, barely 20 percent of the land worth trying to farm, no coal, precious little iron, and yet in 60 years they’ve tried with success to leap onto the global stage.”
Gingrich, “Pearl Harbor: A Novel of December 8th,” p.30.



Japan looked enviously at both the United States, and the Soviet Union, and looked at both as sources of those raw materials necessary for empire building.

But.....which nation to conquer for those materials???????




Luckily for Stalin that he had his beau, FDR, as well as his spies, in the White House.

 

[Camp]

Had Franklin Delano Roosevelt not had his attraction to, and affection for, the homicidal psychopath Joseph Stalin, there would not have been a nuclear Soviet Union, a Korean War, Vietnam, even a Red China, and a number of other proxy wars of America vs communism….nor, in fact, would the Soviet Union have survived World War II.

FDR was dead and buried before WWII ended. Much of the FDR bashing from this OP is nothing more than wild speculation and political hackery based on blaming FDR for things that happened after he died.

FDR's alliance and support for Stalin were purely strategic. Russia would lose approximately 10 million soldiers killing millions of German soldiers before Americans landed at Normandy on 6 June 1944.

FDR's strategy was to weaken German forces before engaging them in ground combat. This was done by having Russian forces take on rhe bulk of the ground combat. Between 4 and 8 million German soldiers were killed or captured by Russian forces. A wide disparity exists because almost 4 million captured Germans were lost and or never returned from the Russian Gulags and prison camps.

 

[Camp]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Had Franklin Delano Roosevelt not had his attraction to, and affection for, the homicidal psychopath Joseph Stalin, there would not have been a nuclear Soviet Union, a Korean War, Vietnam, even a Red China, and a number of other proxy wars of America vs communism….nor, in fact, would the Soviet Union have survived World War II.

FDR was dead and buried before WWII ended. Much of the FDR bashing from this OP is nothing more than wild speculation and political hackery based on blaming FDR for things that happened after he died.

FDR's alliance and support for Stalin were purely strategic. Russia would lose approximately 10 million soldiers killing millions of German soldiers before Americans landed at Normandy on 6 June 1944.

FDR's strategy was to weaken German forces before engaging them in ground combat. This was done by having Russian forces take on rhe bulk of the ground combat. Between 4 and 8 million German soldiers were killed or captured by Russian forces. A wide disparity exists because almost 4 million captured Germans were lost and or never returned from the Russian Gulags and prison camps.

Was there anything in my OP, or any of my posts, that you can deny?????

No?


Excellent.



Get the antacids ready.....more coming about your god.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Where should the Japanese have attacked.....America, or the Soviet Union????

Let's see what history suggests......




5. While American racial policies might have been an irritant….San Francisco barred Japanese student from public school in 1905, among other things…..there is this Japanese-Russian history:

a. First Sino-Japanese War of 1895. Russia provided military support to the Qing Empire in China

b. After squabbling over Korea, the Japanese opted to go to war, staging a surprise attack on the Russian navy at Port Arthur on February 8, 1904.

c. Japan was an ally of Britain and the United States in WWI.

d. And, 1918–1922 Japanese military forces went to the Russian Maritime Provinces as part of a larger effort by western powers and Japan to support White Russian forces against the Bolshevik Red Army during the Russian Civil War. The Japanese suffered 1,399 killed and another 1,717 deaths from disease in that intervention.[Wikipedia]

e. The Soviet–Japanese border conflicts was a series of battles and skirmishes between the forces of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Empire of Japan, as well as their respective client states of Mongolia and Manchukuo. Lasting from 1932 to 1939.


And, Japan knew of the natural resources in Siberia….and how useful they could be in empire-building.






Sooo…..in order to build an empire, the question for Japan: attack north, or attack south, the Soviet Union, or the United States. Based on history, North seems the obvious choice…..

Or….

What could be better for the Soviet Union than a war between Japan and the United States!
Just imagine what would have happened had America had a President who wasn't a Stalin boot-licker.


Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?







Next….a particularly dangerous snake in our government: Harry Dexter White.

 

[Camp]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.

You cherry pick, cut and paste while you conveniently ignore and omit anything that disproves or challenges your revisionist nonsense. Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944? Please describe the strategy you would have used to win WWII if Germany had an additional 8 million soldiers available to fight the D-Day invasion.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.

You cherry pick, cut and paste while you conveniently ignore and omit anything that disproves or challenges your revisionist nonsense. Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944? Please describe the strategy you would have used to win WWII if Germany had an additional 8 million soldiers available to fight the D-Day invasion.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.



"Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944?"

You imbecile!!!


Guess who was killing those Russians?????

"World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attacked to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis.

Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army.
"The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war. http://www.ask.com/question/why-did-stalin-kill-so-many-people



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin





And....FDR allowed Stalin to keep 25,000 American soldiers in his prisons....and never a peep!!!

 

[Cellblock2429]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.

You cherry pick, cut and paste while you conveniently ignore and omit anything that disproves or challenges your revisionist nonsense. Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944? Please describe the strategy you would have used to win WWII if Germany had an additional 8 million soldiers available to fight the D-Day invasion.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.



"Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944?"

You imbecile!!!


Guess who was killing those Russians?????

"World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attacked to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis.

Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army.
"The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war. http://www.ask.com/question/why-did-stalin-kill-so-many-people



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin





And....FDR allowed Stalin to keep 25,000 American soldiers in his prisons....and never a peep!!!

/——/ I never knew that

 

[PoliticalChic]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.

You cherry pick, cut and paste while you conveniently ignore and omit anything that disproves or challenges your revisionist nonsense. Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944? Please describe the strategy you would have used to win WWII if Germany had an additional 8 million soldiers available to fight the D-Day invasion.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.



"Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944?"

You imbecile!!!


Guess who was killing those Russians?????

"World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attacked to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis.

Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army.
"The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war. http://www.ask.com/question/why-did-stalin-kill-so-many-people



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin





And....FDR allowed Stalin to keep 25,000 American soldiers in his prisons....and never a peep!!!

/——/ I never knew that

Which part.....that Stalin had his own soldiers shot, that a million joined the Germans, or that Stalin kept thousands of American service men?


I'd be happy to document any of that.

 

[Cellblock2429]

A revisionist has an easy job of shaping their fantasy outlooks of history. Political hackery at it's best is found in revisionist history.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.

You cherry pick, cut and paste while you conveniently ignore and omit anything that disproves or challenges your revisionist nonsense. Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944? Please describe the strategy you would have used to win WWII if Germany had an additional 8 million soldiers available to fight the D-Day invasion.

I document everything I post, while you are merely our best source of greenhouse gases.



"Do you deny Stalin spent over 10 million Russian soldiers lives killing Germans before American forces landed on the Normandy beaches in 1944?"

You imbecile!!!


Guess who was killing those Russians?????

"World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attacked to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis.

Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army.
"The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.


Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war. http://www.ask.com/question/why-did-stalin-kill-so-many-people



"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"
Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin





And....FDR allowed Stalin to keep 25,000 American soldiers in his prisons....and never a peep!!!

/——/ I never knew that

Which part.....that Stalin had his own soldiers shot, that a million joined the Germans, or that Stalin kept thousands of American service men?


I'd be happy to document any of that.

/---/ What I mean is that I have studied WWII of about 15 years and have read many books, watched documentaries an so forth and I'm always amazed to learn something new all of the time. Here was the last thing I've learned. It was a documentary on the History Channel: https://www.quora.com/What-happened-to-Hitlers-train

 

[Skull Pilot]

She's saying that we should have never defended South Korea.

We shouldn't have And we shouldn't have got involved in Vietnam either

 

[Cellblock2429]

She's saying that we should have never defended South Korea.

We shouldn't have And we shouldn't have got involved in Vietnam either

/----/ There was nothing wrong with defending SK and Vietnam, it was the way Truman and LBJ mismanaged the wars. As much as I despise FDR, he didn't micromanage his Generals the way T and J did. FDR also went full bore on the Axis - no PC crapola for him.

 

[whitehall]

The wholesale killing of civilians in order to convince a regime run by maniacs to surrender was standard operating procedure during WW2.