Synthaholic
Diamond Member
As I figured.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about you using your words, to tell me what your point is, OK?Won't touch what? What is the point you are trying to make? That it's going to be a more conservative Congress?Libs won't touch it and neither will the pussies in the middle.
Tomasky's assertion.
This isn't his Daily Beast column, it's for the NY Review of Books, for the December 18th issue. So he prolly wrote it between the 10th and the 17th.
The state is a bit more than 55% LDS while the legislators are 92% LDS, so, yeah, it does not mean the same thing as in Ohio or Colorado or California.When a state IS a religion - like Utah - how can separation of Church and State have any meaning at all?
Doesn't look like it matters muchHow about you using your words, to tell me what your point is, OK?Won't touch what? What is the point you are trying to make? That it's going to be a more conservative Congress?Libs won't touch it and neither will the pussies in the middle.
Tomasky's assertion.
This isn't his Daily Beast column, it's for the NY Review of Books, for the December 18th issue. So he prolly wrote it between the 10th and the 17th.
The lead story out of the mainstream political press this year has been that establishment conservatism “tamed” the Tea Party, and to the extent that a number of Tea Party challengers lost to establishment conservatives in GOP primaries, this is true. But it’s also a fact that McConnell’s caucus is about to get considerably more conservative than it had been, with the addition of seven very conservative senators: Ernst, Perdue, Colorado’s Cory Gardner, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, Montana’s Steve Daines, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton, and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.4
***************************
In a nutshell, this election did nothing to hurt the Tea Party.
Doesn't look like it matters muchHow about you using your words, to tell me what your point is, OK?Won't touch what? What is the point you are trying to make? That it's going to be a more conservative Congress?Libs won't touch it and neither will the pussies in the middle.
Tomasky's assertion.
This isn't his Daily Beast column, it's for the NY Review of Books, for the December 18th issue. So he prolly wrote it between the 10th and the 17th.
The lead story out of the mainstream political press this year has been that establishment conservatism “tamed” the Tea Party, and to the extent that a number of Tea Party challengers lost to establishment conservatives in GOP primaries, this is true. But it’s also a fact that McConnell’s caucus is about to get considerably more conservative than it had been, with the addition of seven very conservative senators: Ernst, Perdue, Colorado’s Cory Gardner, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, Montana’s Steve Daines, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton, and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.4
***************************
In a nutshell, this election did nothing to hurt the Tea Party.
The state is a bit more than 55% LDS while the legislators are 92% LDS, so, yeah, it does not mean the same thing as in Ohio or Colorado or California.
Most of what you describe isn't universal. Education might have been at one time, but many people question what they are getting (or their children are getting) for their tax dollars.
You said the above, L, not me. The TP got the shit kicked out of it last week. Let's see if that continues.Doesn't look like it matters muchHow about you using your words, to tell me what your point is, OK?Won't touch what? What is the point you are trying to make? That it's going to be a more conservative Congress?
Tomasky's assertion.
This isn't his Daily Beast column, it's for the NY Review of Books, for the December 18th issue. So he prolly wrote it between the 10th and the 17th.
The lead story out of the mainstream political press this year has been that establishment conservatism “tamed” the Tea Party, and to the extent that a number of Tea Party challengers lost to establishment conservatives in GOP primaries, this is true. But it’s also a fact that McConnell’s caucus is about to get considerably more conservative than it had been, with the addition of seven very conservative senators: Ernst, Perdue, Colorado’s Cory Gardner, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, Montana’s Steve Daines, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton, and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.4
***************************
In a nutshell, this election did nothing to hurt the Tea Party.
In the grand scheme of things....I would agree.
However, I was just pointing out that JakeTheFake is dreaming when he says the Tea Party (far right conservatives) are a dying breed.
The state is a bit more than 55% LDS while the legislators are 92% LDS, so, yeah, it does not mean the same thing as in Ohio or Colorado or California.
OK, so you live in a theocracy. Now 'splain how there's any difference between the burqa and your mystical-magical pajamas. I mean other than one being worn openly.
You said the above, L, not me. The TP got the shit kicked out of it last week. Let's see if that continues.Doesn't look like it matters muchHow about you using your words, to tell me what your point is, OK?Tomasky's assertion.
This isn't his Daily Beast column, it's for the NY Review of Books, for the December 18th issue. So he prolly wrote it between the 10th and the 17th.
The lead story out of the mainstream political press this year has been that establishment conservatism “tamed” the Tea Party, and to the extent that a number of Tea Party challengers lost to establishment conservatives in GOP primaries, this is true. But it’s also a fact that McConnell’s caucus is about to get considerably more conservative than it had been, with the addition of seven very conservative senators: Ernst, Perdue, Colorado’s Cory Gardner, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, Montana’s Steve Daines, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton, and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.4
***************************
In a nutshell, this election did nothing to hurt the Tea Party.
In the grand scheme of things....I would agree.
However, I was just pointing out that JakeTheFake is dreaming when he says the Tea Party (far right conservatives) are a dying breed.
I answered you. And you are bouncing like flubber.
Now answer me. When did you become an atheist?
You said the above, L, not me. The TP got the shit kicked out of it last week. Let's see if that continues.Doesn't look like it matters muchHow about you using your words, to tell me what your point is, OK?
This isn't his Daily Beast column, it's for the NY Review of Books, for the December 18th issue. So he prolly wrote it between the 10th and the 17th.
The lead story out of the mainstream political press this year has been that establishment conservatism “tamed” the Tea Party, and to the extent that a number of Tea Party challengers lost to establishment conservatives in GOP primaries, this is true. But it’s also a fact that McConnell’s caucus is about to get considerably more conservative than it had been, with the addition of seven very conservative senators: Ernst, Perdue, Colorado’s Cory Gardner, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, Montana’s Steve Daines, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton, and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.4
***************************
In a nutshell, this election did nothing to hurt the Tea Party.
In the grand scheme of things....I would agree.
However, I was just pointing out that JakeTheFake is dreaming when he says the Tea Party (far right conservatives) are a dying breed.
You have a keen grasp of the obvious.
So what happened to Boner ?
Seems he's rolling over.
Tough shit.
The dems don't count.