McConnell = Paper Tiger
One of the best Senators money can buy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
McConnell = Paper Tiger
.
The GOP has done a shitty job of offering a clear alternative that covers most people.
Right now it's too easy for the Dems to say "they want you to be on your own."
The GOP had their chance, oh well.
.
I think putting everyone to work is the most logical of alternatives.
Yep. Jobs, jobs, jobs. But, the GOP represents the business class and both understand that high unemployment makes it much easier to cut wages and benefits. It's no surprise the GOP never solved the illegal immigration problem when they controlled the White House, The Congress and had five fairly certain votes on the Supreme Court - cheap labor benefits the few and not the many.
So we'll test 100% (or close to it) of the people for serious medical conditions, to screen out the scant few percent who may have said nondescript maladies ?No one knows if the costs to provide actual medical care will go up or down. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Many serious medical conditions diagnosed early can be treated successfully and at less cost - both in terms of dollars spent and human misery.
Yeah...That'll save heaps of dough!
I think putting everyone to work is the most logical of alternatives.
Yep. Jobs, jobs, jobs. But, the GOP represents the business class and both understand that high unemployment makes it much easier to cut wages and benefits. It's no surprise the GOP never solved the illegal immigration problem when they controlled the White House, The Congress and had five fairly certain votes on the Supreme Court - cheap labor benefits the few and not the many.
No question that the GOP wants jobs, jobs, jobs
But only low paying jobs that they can make the most profit off of
I think putting everyone to work is the most logical of alternatives.
Yep. Jobs, jobs, jobs. But, the GOP represents the business class and both understand that high unemployment makes it much easier to cut wages and benefits. It's no surprise the GOP never solved the illegal immigration problem when they controlled the White House, The Congress and had five fairly certain votes on the Supreme Court - cheap labor benefits the few and not the many.
No question that the GOP wants jobs, jobs, jobs
But only low paying jobs that they can make the most profit off of
So we'll test 100% (or close to it) of the people for serious medical conditions, to screen out the scant few percent who may have said nondescript maladies ?No one knows if the costs to provide actual medical care will go up or down. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Many serious medical conditions diagnosed early can be treated successfully and at less cost - both in terms of dollars spent and human misery.
Yeah...That'll save heaps of dough!
Yep. Jobs, jobs, jobs. But, the GOP represents the business class and both understand that high unemployment makes it much easier to cut wages and benefits. It's no surprise the GOP never solved the illegal immigration problem when they controlled the White House, The Congress and had five fairly certain votes on the Supreme Court - cheap labor benefits the few and not the many.
No question that the GOP wants jobs, jobs, jobs
But only low paying jobs that they can make the most profit off of
Not to mention getting rid of the minimum wage so we all can work for $3 an hour. Go GOP!
Pfft.
You just flunked statistics 101 and basic common sense, I'm the myopic one?
"By using a budget process called reconciliation, a theoretical Senate GOP majority could successfully vote to repeal the law with just 51 votes, rather than a filibuster-proof 60. Republicans need to pick up four seats to win control of the Senate, or three if Romney wins the White House."
McConnell: I'll repeal Obamacare as majority leader - POLITICO.com
Projecting again, Danny?
Why don't you tell us all how testing 100% of the population to screen out the few percent for life threatening maladies is in any way economically efficient?
C'mon....Dazzle us.
No question that the GOP wants jobs, jobs, jobs
But only low paying jobs that they can make the most profit off of
Not to mention getting rid of the minimum wage so we all can work for $3 an hour. Go GOP!
$3 an hour wage, no insurance, no benefits, no job security
Just think......Conservatives could create a lot more jobs
Or....they could just pocket the extra cash
Projecting again, Danny?
Why don't you tell us all how testing 100% of the population to screen out the few percent for life threatening maladies is in any way economically efficient?
C'mon....Dazzle us.
"Saves lives" is not an economic argument, it's an appeal to emotion.Projecting again, Danny?
Why don't you tell us all how testing 100% of the population to screen out the few percent for life threatening maladies is in any way economically efficient?
C'mon....Dazzle us.
Saves lives
Doesn't mean much to the party of "let him die" but the rest of us think it is important
Projecting again, Danny?
Why don't you tell us all how testing 100% of the population to screen out the few percent for life threatening maladies is in any way economically efficient?
C'mon....Dazzle us.
"Saves lives" is not an economic argument, it's an appeal to emotion.Projecting again, Danny?
Why don't you tell us all how testing 100% of the population to screen out the few percent for life threatening maladies is in any way economically efficient?
C'mon....Dazzle us.
Saves lives
Doesn't mean much to the party of "let him die" but the rest of us think it is important
Try and concentrate.
I didn't invoke an economic argument that's nothing but an easily debunked leftard yapping point, which doesn't make any sense to anyone with a critical thought in their head."Saves lives" is not an economic argument, it's an appeal to emotion.Saves lives
Doesn't mean much to the party of "let him die" but the rest of us think it is important
Try and concentrate.
Who gives a shit Dude?
We choose to live in a society where people do not die at 54
Well, those of us who are not Libertarian do
I didn't invoke an economic argument that's nothing but an easily debunked leftard yapping point, which doesn't make any sense to anyone with a critical thought in their head."Saves lives" is not an economic argument, it's an appeal to emotion.
Try and concentrate.
Who gives a shit Dude?
We choose to live in a society where people do not die at 54
Well, those of us who are not Libertarian do
And we live in a society where the average life expectancy is well into the mid-to-upper '70s.
You really shouldn't be hitting the hard stuff so early in the day.