Midnight Marauder
Rookie
- Feb 28, 2009
- 12,404
- 1,939
- 0
- Banned
- #21
That's NOT the question I asked. You are avoiding the questions, most especially this one:Answer MY questions first. It's interesting you are avoiding them:How is it total nonsense? Was my math wrong?
WHO sets the bar? What qualifies them to do so? Then what stops them from moving the goalposts later?
You sure you want to set that precedent? For if you do, what's to stop the G from later saying 20x is too much, not fair, and make it 10? 5? 2? And finally 0?
Why do you want to give the most wasteful and inefficient entity on the planet still more power?
I didn't avoid it, I said that Slippery Slopes are pointless to address. You didn't like at answers and ignored it.
But if you insist, competition is important to growth so I felt that x20 the compensation of low skilled workers would be a fair compensation. On the other hand excessive compensation to the detriment of middle class viability is also bad for growth. I'm not a socialist. I am just considering anti-gluttony.
Why do you want to give the most wasteful and inefficient entity on the planet still more power?
If there is a "slippery slope" it's because YOU created it, therefore it's on YOU to address it. You don't believe you need to address unintended consequences? You don't believe in defending your idiotic proposal?
WHO decides what is "gluttony" and what isn't? What qualifies them? What stops them from changing the definitions later?I am just considering anti-gluttony.