Flaylo
Handsome Devil
- Thread starter
- #41
It may be a 'right' wing website but it is factually accurate. You may not like those facts but that doesn't change them.
You're just pissed cuz you got your ass handed to you.
Why did you lie about me? Why did you pretend that I'd said something I hadn't said? Why lie, Flail?
Rightwing and factually accurate don't fucking go together and your dumbass fucking ass has never read any of MLK's speeches, especially the ones in his later life after he began focusing on the Vietnam War and economic empowerment. The best you can come up with is some right slanted bullshit website that says MLk was a Republican eventhough everything he stood for was against conservative bullshit.
Wrong. Factually accurate is factually accurate - whatever source it comes from. And, unless you can actually prove that I have never read any of MLKs speeches - then, again, you are fucking lying.
Stop lying in order to try and score points off me. It doesn't work.
Wiki says King was GOP. Every fucking factually accurate history of King says he was a Republican. I know it's hard for you but it is a fact. A fact is a fact and no amount of whining, and hysteria will change it.
You say you embrace King's message. Well, you do not. You hate those who disagree with you. Kind didn't. King chose to be Christ-like in his opposition. He used reason and intellect to win people over to his message. You use hysteria, lies, untruths, inaccuracies and whining.
You have not a shred of evidence that MLK was a Republican, where is Charlie Bass when you need him? Again I ask you, how many of his speeches have you read? Do you know his positions of economics and wealth distribution in America? And MLK sure as hell wasn't not passive candy assed sissy that took shit from his enemies.