Married GOP Rep. Caught Kissing Staffer In Surveillance Video

[Lonestar_logic]

These kinds of threads always seem to devolve into a contest to determine which political party has the most perverts.

The weird thing is that the Democrats don't care if they win or lose, they just seem to enjoy the game....

.

Oh, I dunno.

I accept that there are going to be perverts in both parties and when they are found out, they should be thrown out. It's real simple to me.

The DIFFERENCE is that the GOP has been the party that claims to have the moral high ground and at the same time very erroneously claims that the DEMS have no moral ground at all, so when one of theirs pops a 13 year old girl in the back of a car or sucks a 16 year old boy to completion and then other GOPers look away as if nothing happens, the rest of the world laughs it's ass off at GOP idiots who don't even have enough sense to admit that one of theirs really, really fucked up.

I was one of the first to go totally ballistic on Anthony Weiner when it happened, and I'm a Democrat.

Oh, and FOX loves to lie with it's Chyrons, too. Remember when Mark Foley got caught for bending over those White House pages (male, teenage) or giving them handjobs? Why, sure you do. Mark Foley is a REPUBLICAN. So, how did Fox depict him?

And when Mark Sanford lied out his ass about "hiking the Appalachian Trail" when in reality he was pumping his South American mistress full of his born-again Christian love? Remember that? I do. Well, here is how FOX news represented him when it all came out:

Of course, South Carolinan Republicans punished him real bad by electing him as a Representative to congress in 2013. Family values!!!


Or David Vitter, you know, the one who likes to wear diapers and also fucked the same DC madam as Democrat Elliot Spitzer (bipartisan work!!!). Well, when he was massaging her inner-values with his one salute soldier, how did Fox treat it? Let's see:

He admitted to the affair, but FOX didn't want to report. Remember, Vitter is the same dude who called for Bill Clinton to resign because of an extra-marital affair. And he got re-elected to the Senate, because by G-d, this is how Republicans punish adulterers!! Elliot Spitzer (D) resigned, btw.


Or, Robert Arango, a Republican from Puerto Rico who got busted for trying to hook up with hot men to pop him - he was sending photos of his anus so that guys could decide whether to bang him or not. And when caught, he lied like a rug and said he took the photos of his anus to "document weight loss". OF HIS ANUS!!! Oh, and did I tell you he was married and had kids when it happened? Well, he got caught and resigned, but what photo did the right choose to publish of him? Here:

Yepp, that's Arango, posing with former Pres. Clinton while Bill was visiting Puerto Rico during the DEM primaries of 2008. They Rightie press wanted to make him look like he was a DEM, but he's a Republican, through and through. And he is the one to sponsored anti-gay legislation in the Puerto Rican House.

The long and short of it is that there are a lot of horny toads in Washington and G-d only knows what they all do in the late hours of the night. And actually, it's none of our damned business. Only, Republicans tend to be rewarded for their "Christian Values" by getting re-elected, while Democrats tend to get thrown out of office. If David Vitter was really, really, really a born-again Christian, he would have accepted the logical punishment for his transgressions and he would have resigned. You do know what the Bible says about adultery, right?

That being said, I am still having a hard time getting all umbraged up over the OP. The video caught him kissing her in a hotel room. Interesting that he turned the lights off before kissing her. He probably just fucked her brains out in the bedroom, they probably just got dressed and then they left. A story that has happened thousands of times. But since she is on his payroll, there might be some investigations coming at him. Wait and see.

OH, and the big one is yet to come. Every mid-term, there is usually one really juicy sex scandal, usually about the guy no one would ever suspect. I'm pretty sure we will all have fun with that one!

"The DIFFERENCE is that the GOP has been the party that claims to have the moral high ground and at the same time very erroneously claims that the DEMS have no moral ground at all, so when one of theirs pops a young woman in the back of a car or or orally services a young guy to completion and then other GOPers look away as if nothing happens, the rest of the world laughs it's ass off at GOP idiots who don't even have enough sense to admit that one of theirs really, really fucked up."

Leftwing talking point nothing more.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Leftwing talking point nothing more.

No. Historical facts, facts you cannot make go away.

 

[Dot Com]

McAllister Still Absent From Congress - NBC News

Where is that Republican fucktard..... errr..... scumbag?

 

[Vigilante]

It has to do with where I took the topic, which you were stupid enough to challenge. The thread topic is about a married GOPer who got caught kissing a staffer. I was giving him kudos for it at least being with a person of the opposite sex and of legal age since there have been sooooo many GOPers who were caught cheating on their spouse with someone of the same sex or with having sex with minors or with being caught with child pornography. That's not to say that there has never been a Democrat caught doing the same, but the proclivity leans way to the right. You thought you could keep up with me. You failed miserably. That's why your list included a Republican sex offender as well as others who didn't have gay sex or sex with minors. And that's why you're eager now to switch to different crimes.

Thanks! You helped proved my point better than I did.

OK, shall we now start with REAL crime?

Now that we both agree the GOP is [primarily] the party of disturbingly sick sex offenders, sure. I don't see the point in doing so, but I'm confident that there are at least as many Republicans as there are Democrats.

Well having alist in front of me, and from The Ike administration on there were 53 Democrats and 43 Republicans, Now, my count may be off, and seeing how OCD you are about Dem/Rep crime, you can count them again!
Now these are only Federal, the states aren't included!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes

 

[Dot Com]

when is the hypocrite going to show up for work?

 

[Vigilante]

when is the hypocrite going to show up for work?

Why don't you call him and ask him....Telephone # on the Congressional website!

 

[Dot Com]

good idea. Maybe I will

 

[Smilebong]

Clinton was caught shoving cigars up the ass of a fat Jewish intern in the oval office, and every liberal blamed Kenneth Star for pursuing Clinton for lying under oath.

And....

Liberals not only did not give one shit that their lord Clinton did it, they respect him for disrespecting the office.

Every day liberals do not disappoint. They show new and clever ways to illustrate their pathetic hypocrisy.

Clinton can do no wrong. He could have assassinated Netanyahu and gotten away with it.

Really? The same Bill Clinton who was IMPEACHED?

But the Impeachment was not successful.

 

[katsteve2012]

Clinton can do no wrong. He could have assassinated Netanyahu and gotten away with it.

Really? The same Bill Clinton who was IMPEACHED?

But the Impeachment was not successful.

No it was not, because he did not resign as the GOP wanted, and he was not removed from office, however, if he was as "infallible" as you stated, he never would have been impeached. That's what I am saying.

 

[katsteve2012]

Clinton was caught shoving cigars up the ass of a fat Jewish intern in the oval office, and every liberal blamed Kenneth Star for pursuing Clinton for lying under oath.

And....

Liberals not only did not give one shit that their lord Clinton did it, they respect him for disrespecting the office.

Every day liberals do not disappoint. They show new and clever ways to illustrate their pathetic hypocrisy.

Clinton can do no wrong. He could have assassinated Netanyahu and gotten away with it.

Yes, when you deliver 3% unemployment and massive peace and prosperity, people tend to like that sort of thing.

Especially if things are almost opposite when you initially walk into office. What is really interesting about Cintons terms is that he was blocked much like Obama in his first term, but got more cooperation in his second term term, and look at what he accomplished.

 

[Uncensored2008]

No it was not, because he did not resign as the GOP wanted, and he was not removed from office, however, if he was as "infallible" as you stated, he never would have been impeached. That's what I am saying.

The impeachment proved that democrats hold party above country. He was impeached because their were enough Republicans in the House to hold him accountable. He was not convected because democrats have contempt for the concept of law, placing party above country.

Nixon showed that no man is above the law.

Clinton showed that doesn't apply to democrats.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Clinton can do no wrong. He could have assassinated Netanyahu and gotten away with it.

Really? The same Bill Clinton who was IMPEACHED?

But the Impeachment was not successful.

He was impeached by the House of Representatives on two counts, perjury and obstruction of justice. He was acquitted by the Senate.

 

[Theowl32]

This entire thread is made up of the hypocrites on the left flat out stating they do not care about morals, but all they do is accuse and laugh at republicans who have been caught being immoral, while they claim that it is perfectly ok for ALL of the democrats that have been caught being immoral cause they never claim to be moral.

This thread is precisely what makes every last left winger a steaming piece of hypocritical shit.

 

[bendog]

Oh, I though the Lewinsky thing was hilarious till impeachment.

Of course I normally vote gop.

But you, know the staffer isn't half bad looking and apparently she'll be single again soon.

 

[katsteve2012]

No it was not, because he did not resign as the GOP wanted, and he was not removed from office, however, if he was as "infallible" as you stated, he never would have been impeached. That's what I am saying.

The impeachment proved that democrats hold party above country. He was impeached because their were enough Republicans in the House to hold him accountable. He was not convected because democrats have contempt for the concept of law, placing party above country.

Nixon showed that no man is above the law.

Clinton showed that doesn't apply to democrats.

The impeachment proved but one thing which is that the House of Representatives in this isolated case took the position that it was justified to initiate, and the Senate has the power to try on the charges brought forth by the House. That is the way the process of impeachment works. Nixon and Clinton were both accused of inappropriate conduct that was deemed as being breaches of integrity. One chose to resign and one did not, but neither one personified the "values" of an entire political party.

 

[Dot Com]

Oh, I though the Lewinsky thing was hilarious till impeachment.

Of course I normally vote gop.

But you, know the staffer isn't half bad looking and apparently she'll be single again soon.

yeah. I was wondering what her husband would say to her dalliances at *cough* "work"

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

McAllister says he wont resign despite calls from GOP leaders to do so, even Governor Jindal.


McAllister says he's not resigning - KNOE 8 News; KNOE-TV; KNOE.com |

 

[Vigilante]

McAllister says he wont resign despite calls from GOP leaders to do so, even Governor Jindal.


McAllister says he's not resigning - KNOE 8 News; KNOE-TV; KNOE.com |

What, resign over kisses, perhaps a feel, and a stinky finger, BJ Clinton got all those and a BJ with PROOF on a blue dress, and that pervert hung on! The hypocrisy of the left is worth bookmarking to further insult them in other threads!

 

[Uncensored2008]

The impeachment proved but one thing which is that the House of Representatives in this isolated case took the position that it was justified to initiate, and the Senate has the power to try on the charges brought forth by the House. That is the way the process of impeachment works. Nixon and Clinton were both accused of inappropriate conduct that was deemed as being breaches of integrity. One chose to resign and one did not, but neither one personified the "values" of an entire political party.

Clinton's crimes were far worse than Nixon's.

The difference is that the Republicans, led by Goldwater made it clear they would put the law above the party. democrats unzipped their flies and pissed all over the law. democrats don't give a flying fuck about this nation or it's laws, the party and the acquisition of power is the ONLY thing democrats care about. They are the party of sociopaths - utterly without even a hint of integrity.

 

[katsteve2012]

The impeachment proved but one thing which is that the House of Representatives in this isolated case took the position that it was justified to initiate, and the Senate has the power to try on the charges brought forth by the House. That is the way the process of impeachment works. Nixon and Clinton were both accused of inappropriate conduct that was deemed as being breaches of integrity. One chose to resign and one did not, but neither one personified the "values" of an entire political party.

Clinton's crimes were far worse than Nixon's.

The difference is that the Republicans, led by Goldwater made it clear they would put the law above the party. democrats unzipped their flies and pissed all over the law. democrats don't give a flying fuck about this nation or it's laws, the party and the acquisition of power is the ONLY thing democrats care about. They are the party of sociopaths - utterly without even a hint of integrity.

I was not comparing Nixon and Clinton, you are. And frankly what happened with both of them is history at this point. Goldwater is dead, Nixon is dead and Clinton is no longer in office, and no matter how good or bad any of them were has nothing to do with the present.

What I am stating is that I see no value in passing judgement on either party in its entirety because of the actions of certain individuals.

Both parties have their leaders and followers who lack moral integrity and it is usually those who cast the largest stones pertaining to morality, that have a skeleton in hiding.

From my perspective, the ongoing gamesmanship, finger pointing and moralizing is pure ignorance that divides the country and prevents the two parties from working together for the common good of the citizens, and nobody wins.