March for our Lives represents the future

[Pogo]

Some early estimates, from journalists, of #MarchForOurLives crowd sizes:
800,000 - D.C.
175,000 - NYC
50,000 - Boston
20,000 - Parkland, Fla
15,000 - Chicago
10,000 - San Francisco
10,000 - San Diego

They'd been better off going to a library and studying....particularly history and the Constitution

I don't know if anyone's told you this arcane secret but ----- that wouldn't have made a public statement.

Which is, I understand, what you want.

Tough shit. First Amendment lives.

 

[Pogo]

March for our Lives and the younger generation represents the future. Trump and his supporters represent the past.

If a profanity laced, ignorant loon is your version of the future, then we're all done. This generation coming up doesn't have the slightest clue about anything.

Tens of thousands of people crying to the government to protect them.

It's sad sad sad

When these idiots learn that the government not only can't but won't protect them they will wish they had the second amendment rights they are so willing to throw away

Thats exactly right. These idiots are the products of an indoctrination system that has nothing to do with the US constitution.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, if only that Constitution had sump'm in there about free exercise of opinion or petitioning the government or some such, then they'd have a point.

Oh wait.

 

[Pogo]

Some early estimates, from journalists, of #MarchForOurLives crowd sizes:
800,000 - D.C.
175,000 - NYC
50,000 - Boston
20,000 - Parkland, Fla
15,000 - Chicago
10,000 - San Francisco
10,000 - San Diego

BAAAAA BAAAAAA

Flocks of sheep

That's a pic of what's commonly called an "Irish traffic jam".

And you'll notice the car from which the photo is taken ------ is stopped.

 

[hunarcy]

March for our Lives and the younger generation represents the future. Trump and his supporters represent the past.

Ah, okay. I see. So you dismiss as outdated anyone who disagrees with your mindless fixation on guns instead of the people who use them for mass shootings and instead of the multiple failures of local and federal law enforcement personnel to intervene after receiving numerous warnings about Cruz. Nah, it's just all the fault of those evil guns, guns, guns.

Tell me: What would you be saying if Cruz had used a car and had run over and killed 17 students as they were leaving school? You know that we've had several cases in the last two years of people using cars to kill multiple victims, right? So what would you be saying if Cruz had used a car instead of a rifle?

The funniest (funny=odd) is that the guy is touting young people when it is THEY who are doing the mass shooting. It's not the older generation or NRA members who are doing it. Its people their age, yet we're supposed to "listen" to the young people.

 

[Redfish]

March for our Lives and the younger generation represents the future. Trump and his supporters represent the past.

if the future US will look like Hitler's Germany or Mao's china, then you are correct. Is that what you really want? Are you that stupid?

 

[Flash]

A bunch of assholes marching around to take away our constitutional rights.

However, not as many as the shitheads that organized it thought there would be.

Report: March For Our Lives Crowd Count Well Below Expected And Initial Reports

Report: March For Our Lives Crowd Count Well Below Expected And Initial Reports

Around 200,000 people attended the March For Our Lives gun control event in Washington, D.C. Saturday afternoon, CBS News reported.

The number is well below the 500,000 number organizers of the event expected and 600,000 less than initially reported by many news outlets immediately following the celebrity-fueled march and rally. The march took place between noon and 3 p.m. on Pennsylvania Avenue between 3rd Street NW and 12th Street NW.

 

[Redfish]

a challenge for all of our liberal posters:

please give us the language of a bill that you believe would stop gun violence. give us the exact wording, and then explain in detail how it would stop all mass murders in the USA.

then, how about a bill to stop murders by truck, bomb, knife, hammer, baseball bat, fist. please post the legislation that you believe will fix these problems.

This is a serious request, we will anxiously await your proposed bill language.

 

[Flash]

a challenge for all of our liberal posters:

please give us the language of a bill that you believe would stop gun violence. give us the exact wording, and then explain in detail how it would stop all mass murders in the USA.

then, how about a bill to stop murders by truck, bomb, knife, hammer, baseball bat, fist. please post the legislation that you believe will fix these problems.

This is a serious request, we will anxiously await your proposed bill language.

If these Libtards were serious about stopping gun violence they would be marching in the streets of South Chicago and other big city ghettos where most of the gun violence perpetrated by minorities takes place.

However, there agenda is not to stop gun violence. Their agenda is to take firearms away from White Conservative men that oppose their socialists agenda.

 

[Redfish]

a challenge for all of our liberal posters:

please give us the language of a bill that you believe would stop gun violence. give us the exact wording, and then explain in detail how it would stop all mass murders in the USA.

then, how about a bill to stop murders by truck, bomb, knife, hammer, baseball bat, fist. please post the legislation that you believe will fix these problems.

This is a serious request, we will anxiously await your proposed bill language.

If these Libtards were serious about stopping gun violence they would be marching in the streets of South Chicago and other big city ghettos where most of the gun violence perpetrated by minorities takes place.

However, there agenda is not to stop gun violence. Their agenda is to take firearms away from White Conservative men that oppose their socialists agenda.

100% correct, but you will never get even one of them to admit that that is their real agenda.

 

[Pogo]

a challenge for all of our liberal posters:

please give us the language of a bill that you believe would stop gun violence. give us the exact wording, and then explain in detail how it would stop all mass murders in the USA.

then, how about a bill to stop murders by truck, bomb, knife, hammer, baseball bat, fist. please post the legislation that you believe will fix these problems.

This is a serious request, we will anxiously await your proposed bill language.

If these Libtards were serious about stopping gun violence they would be marching in the streets of South Chicago and other big city ghettos where most of the gun violence perpetrated by minorities takes place.

However, there agenda is not to stop gun violence. Their agenda is to take firearms away from White Conservative men that oppose their socialists agenda.

100% correct, but you will never get even one of them to admit that that is their real agenda.

Why imagine that, somebody refusing to "admit" to an outside party's comic-book paranoia fantasy contrived because they're too immersed in their own comic books to be LISTENING to what the actual motivations in the real world, are.

The noive. If ya can't depend on a disembodied parrot voice on a message board to tell you what your own motivations are, where ya gonna go?

 

[LoneLaugher]

March for our Lives and the younger generation represents the future. Trump and his supporters represent the past.

What an awesome post! So deep. So emotional.

 

[Pogo]

a challenge for all of our liberal posters:

please give us the language of a bill that you believe would stop gun violence. give us the exact wording, and then explain in detail how it would stop all mass murders in the USA.

then, how about a bill to stop murders by truck, bomb, knife, hammer, baseball bat, fist. please post the legislation that you believe will fix these problems.

This is a serious request, we will anxiously await your proposed bill language.

It's the wrong question. For multiple reasons.

The first being (the base issue being mass gun slaughter), this is a cultural infection. As such it's not seriously curtailed by "bills". It's curtailed by cultural change, which is an entirely different approach.

The second reason it's the wrong question is the false comparison between the issue as stated, and "murder". "Murder" may be the legal term describing the result of mass gun slaughter but it is not the objective of the slaughterer. Even if it is the inevitable end result. Therefore it's an entirely different motivation.

The (true) murderer targets specifically. An unfaithful spouse, a cheating business partner, a witness who knows too much. Specific and personal. His objective is to take out that person/people, for reasons specific TO those people. The mass shooter has no such specificity in mind; taking advantage of any target that happens to present. Doesn't matter who it is. The mass shooter's objective is carnage; the sensory input of seeing people (again, makes no difference which people) squirm and scream and bleed and drop in powerless pain. The shooter is feeding his sensory addiction, usually out of his own real or imagined sense of powerlessness (which is why the mass shooter is virtually always a "he") with the sensory input that only a firearm can provide.

And that's exactly why we have mass shootings and not so much mass stabbings, mass poisonings, mass hammer or baseball attacks, etc. Those cannot provide the immediate sensory input a firearm can, from a remote-control safe distance, even from one's hotel room or tower perch. That's also why their weapon of choice is a specifically military infantry model designed specifically for rapidly strafing a line of "enemy" infantry armed with the same thing -- because it delivers MAXIMUM carnage --- which is what they, the mass shooter, seek. In other words we have mass gun slaughter because we have a gun culture. If we had a poisoning culture, where you couldn't flip through any TV dial or any movie theater or any video game without encountering a depiction of somebody being poisoned -- then we'd have mass poisonings. Because we would have made poisoning "cool".

Which returns us to the cultural --- if we (seriously) want to eliminate that kind of scene, then it's first necessary to remove the desire for carnage-as-drug. And to get there we have to first quit the whole fetishizing and glorification of guns, right down to the basic idea that the solution for any problem is to shoot at it and blow it up. That death-cult mentality has got to go. Starkly simple as that.

So ultimately the solution for all this is not so much legislative as spritual.

 

[Pogo]

A bunch of assholes marching around to take away our constitutional rights.

However, not as many as the shitheads that organized it thought there would be.

Report: March For Our Lives Crowd Count Well Below Expected And Initial Reports

Report: March For Our Lives Crowd Count Well Below Expected And Initial Reports

Around 200,000 people attended the March For Our Lives gun control event in Washington, D.C. Saturday afternoon, CBS News reported.

The number is well below the 500,000 number organizers of the event expected and 600,000 less than initially reported by many news outlets immediately following the celebrity-fueled march and rally. The march took place between noon and 3 p.m. on Pennsylvania Avenue between 3rd Street NW and 12th Street NW.

Aaaaaand the Butthurt continues here on Day Two. This one wants to take on the "ratings" fallacy.

 

[miketx]

March for our Lives and the younger generation represents the future. Trump and his supporters represent the past.

What an awesome post! So deep. So emotional.

Fools like you who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it, just like you are doing.

 

[miketx]

March for our Lives and the younger generation represents the future. Trump and his supporters represent the past.

Indeed, a death knell for the Culture of Death that fixates on killing. One of many, we would hope.

The only people fixated on killing are liberals. They won't punish criminals and then they get more death.

 

[Manonthestreet]

As gun-control advocates their age gain popularity and others cast their generation as anti-firearm, pro-gun students feel at times overlooked. But polling suggests young people aren’t overwhelmingly for gun control.
High schoolers still like their guns, even after Parkland

 

[whitehall]

All we ever hear from the left is old cliches and they think they represent the future. You have to hand it to democrats even though they live in the past. They managed to organize a bunch of kids along with left wing organizations like "Move On, BLM, OWS, (probably CUSA, Planned Parenthood and even lesbian skinheads into a political tool. It remains to be seen how effective it will be politically. Even with the support of the MSM it looks like it is falling apart already.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ignorant children have always been the future.
We can only hope they wise up before they do too much damage,
to themselves and others.

 

[Manonthestreet]

March for our lives doesn't even represent the victims
Parkland Survivor: Don't Use My Sister to Push Gun Control

 

[TemplarKormac]

The (true) murderer targets specifically. An unfaithful spouse, a cheating business partner, a witness who knows too much. Specific and personal. His objective is to take out that person/people, for reasons specific TO those people. The mass shooter has no such specificity in mind; taking advantage of any target that happens to present. Doesn't matter who it is. The mass shooter's objective is carnage; the sensory input of seeing people (again, makes no difference which people) squirm and scream and bleed and drop in powerless pain. The shooter is feeding his sensory addiction, usually out of his own real or imagined sense of powerlessness (which is why the mass shooter is virtually always a "he") with the sensory input that only a firearm can provide.

And that's exactly why we have mass shootings and not so much mass stabbings, mass poisonings, mass hammer or baseball attacks, etc. Those cannot provide the immediate sensory input a firearm can, from a remote-control safe distance, even from one's hotel room or tower perch. That's also why their weapon of choice is a specifically military infantry model designed specifically for rapidly strafing a line of "enemy" infantry armed with the same thing -- because it delivers MAXIMUM carnage --- which is what they, the mass shooter, seek. In other words we have mass gun slaughter because we have a gun culture. If we had a poisoning culture, where you couldn't flip through any TV dial or any movie theater or any video game without encountering a depiction of somebody being poisoned -- then we'd have mass poisonings. Because we would have made poisoning "cool".

In essence, the shooter makes the choice to kill, not the gun. Whatever the method, death is the goal. Okay. So why did you drag me to this thread?

Also, why do we have a collective of liberal elites in Hollywood starring in movies glorifying this type of violence? Does that not contribute to this "gun culture"?

Moreover, mass shootings don't always take place solely for the sensory satisfaction of the malefactor, they can be motivated by an animus (reference the shooting in Maryland).