Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
she cares more about the criminals than their victimsTrivia: Most towns in the WW West, didn't allow the carrying of firearms within city limits. That said, if the person is a law-abiding, sober and rational individual who simply carries the firearm for the purpose of lethal protection against an armed and dangerous criminal, I don't see a problem with it.We need to put a stop to the insanity. WW West . Got to get the Republicans out of office.
However, I think "concealed carry" as I do, is more appropriate as the general public doesn't see the weapon and therefore isn't instilled with fear. That said, if any individual is calmly walking along and has a pistol or revolver simply sitting in a holster, he/she isn't posing a threat and the public has no need to worry. If he/she is brandishing the weapon, waving it about, then call the cops.