Zone1 Maine will forcefully remove children from parents, if the parents do not obey the Marxists in gender reassignments for the children.

Thats true

modern marxists are woke

The old marxists were not

Commies love faggots, especially kiddie raper faggots. Harry Hay, founder of the faggot rights hoax, was a card carrying member of the Communist Party USA, as was his NAMBLA founder buddy David Thorstad. The June 10, 1994 Worker's VAnguard. A pdf file so those who use phones should avoid clicking the link, it's a download.


Page 4 is an article by Thorstad. Page 5 is about 'Letting NAMBLA March' and the Sparticist League's support for NAMBLA, along with an ad touting previous articles dating back to 1982 espousing their love of kiddie rapers.
 
These American liberals don't want the US Government to control EVERYTHING and redistribute everyone's wealth. That's nothing more than a cheap right-wing Republican polemic and diatribe against Democrat Liberals who want Medicare for all, and make sure the wealthiest people in our society pay their taxes like everybody else and don't hide money in some tax haven somewhere in the Caribbean or a Panamanian bank.

The final objective of Marxist socialism is communism, which is defined as:


"... A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes,[1] and ultimately money[6] and the state (or nation state).[7][8][9]"

Communism is a stateless, classless society that no longer needs money as a means of exchange, due to the lack of markets and the individual consumer's control over the means of production. The abolition of private property doesn't include personal property. Practically everything that you own now is your personal property, whereas private property is assets that you can use to exploit the labor of other human beings and produce goods and services for a profit. If your property doesn't fall within that category, it's your personal property.
Writing in black is a bad idea, many here use the dark mode skin that turns the background to black. Making your post look like blank areas.
 
Yeah right sure sure. The cost of living is due to capitalism's lust for profits at all costs, even if it means cannibalizing the working class, which produces everything in society. The destruction of the US economy began with the inflation caused by Vietnam, the large-scale introduction of computers in the workplace in the 1970s, eliminating millions of jobs, and Ronald Reagan's "supply-side economics", which gutted our manufacturing base and broke up most of America's labor unions. Our massive debt crisis, which is often mentioned by Republicans started with Reagan. When Reagan entered office, the highest marginal tax rate was 70%, when he left office it was 28%.

The golden age of the US economy was when its workforce was highly unionized and based on manufacturing rather than finance/Wall Street/speculative trading. The highest marginal tax rate was 91% in the 1950s and into the 60s. The average CEO of companies with 500+ employees earned no more than 20 to 30 times the salary of their average worker. Today the CEOs of the largest companies in our country make as much as 1000 times more than the average salary in their companies. The degree of inequality in our country is gross and off the charts. This leads to social unrest and eventually people not having enough to pay their bills.

My maternal grandfather and grandmother, with my mother, migrated to this country with little money in 1961. My grandfather worked hard for Bertram Yachts in Miami, Florida, spraying boat molds with fiberglass, to produce boat hulls. It was a labor-intensive, toxic/hazardous blue-collar job and he didn't just support a family with his salary but saved money and by 1965 he purchased his house cash, mortgage-free, without a bank loan. The house cost him $15,000, it had a backyard full of aguacate and mango trees. It was a beautiful two-bedroom house with a decent-sized backyard, a little garage, a TV room, a big living room, a nice kitchen..etc. Is that possible today? No way.
What you miss in all of this, is actually the very things that your name should truly represent, but it doesn't because you are a fraud attempting to use such a name in order to push an anti-Christian agenda.

What you are missing is the fact that when Christianity was embedded into the brains of the MAJORITY of the citizenry, then the merit based system of "capitalism" as it was being run for the most part by a majority of good honorable people, had worked perfectly because it was being run by those majority honorable people.

Your gig is to take advantage of the system that's been taken over by these dishonorable radicals, and it is to attempt to change it over to something else, otherwise instead of fighting to restore or support the character of the people that would call themselves MAGA in which that movement represents exactly what MAGA is.
 
You won't but others will. You keep saying that Biden stole the election yet not one piece of evidence has held up in court, so you have nothing but your feelings and wishes, not reality. You're suffering from a delusion.


That is not true. There are three states where vote fraud has been proven. The msm simply refuses to report those facts.
 
That is not true. There are three states where vote fraud has been proven. The msm simply refuses to report those facts.
It's an infamous "what the hell does it matter now" moment I guess, otherwise the same one that Hillary used in the hearing over the Libya issue once she felt defeated in that hearing. The problem with the Republicans is that like most issue's they don't drill down on the core once it was broken through and exposed. Are they compromised ?
 
Show me anywhere in the writings of Karl Marx, where he in any way promoted or condoned LGBT+ values or all of this gender dysphoria. You won't find it. Marx with his colleague and fellow communist philosopher, Fredrick Engels, had very negative views of homosexuals. They are identified as "homophobes" by many pro-LGBT+ activists.
It's the Marxists that followed and expanded the "oppressed" classes. Like this clown who had a trans clinic,

Marxism and Homosexual Liberation: Magnus Hirschfeld’s Relations with the Social-Democratic Party of Germany and the Early Soviet Government​

 
It's the Marxists that followed and expanded the "oppressed" classes. Like this clown who had a trans clinic,

Marxism and Homosexual Liberation: Magnus Hirschfeld’s Relations with the Social-Democratic Party of Germany and the Early Soviet Government​

You're right about that, and I'm not denying what you pointed out, but Marx and Engels weren't LGBT+ friendly. Those who adopted their critique of capitalism also had liberal, "progressive" views about sexuality. Unlike Lenin, Stalin was essentially a National Socialist like Hitler, promoting socially conservative ideals which included condemning open homosexuality, and abortions of convenience. etc.

The most successful form of socialism, at a national level, was both Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Russia. Ironically Hitler and Stalin were at war with each other. The Third Reich made a fatal miscalculation with Operation Barbarossa. Hitler should've allied himself with the Stalinist Nationalists and deployed all of those troops in Western Europe. He made Stalin His enemy and lost the war.
 
You're right about that, and I'm not denying what you pointed out, but Marx and Engels weren't LGBT+ friendly. Those who adopted their critique of capitalism also had liberal, "progressive" views about sexuality. Unlike Lenin, Stalin was essentially a National Socialist like Hitler, promoting socially conservative ideals which included condemning open homosexuality, and abortions of convenience. etc.

The most successful form of socialism, at a national level, was both Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Russia. Ironically Hitler and Stalin were at war with each other. The Third Reich made a fatal miscalculation with Operation Barbarossa. Hitler should've allied himself with the Stalinist Nationalists and deployed all of those troops in Western Europe. He made Stalin His enemy and lost the war.

"Most successful" at what cost of human life?

Like I asked previously, how big of a body count do you seek this time?
 
You're right about that, and I'm not denying what you pointed out, but Marx and Engels weren't LGBT+ friendly. Those who adopted their critique of capitalism also had liberal, "progressive" views about sexuality. Unlike Lenin, Stalin was essentially a National Socialist like Hitler, promoting socially conservative ideals which included condemning open homosexuality, and abortions of convenience. etc.

The most successful form of socialism, at a national level, was both Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Russia. Ironically Hitler and Stalin were at war with each other. The Third Reich made a fatal miscalculation with Operation Barbarossa. Hitler should've allied himself with the Stalinist Nationalists and deployed all of those troops in Western Europe. He made Stalin His enemy and lost the war.

lol rubbish. It was precisely the failure of Hitler's economy that led him to invade and loot other countries to survive politically.






Military spending bankrupted the Nazi govt. Both Nazis and the Soviets settled their social and economic problems with mass murders of its own people, same as Mao and every other commie piece of shit has when in power. It's the 'rational' solution technocrats love to rely on.
 
Last edited:
You're right about that, and I'm not denying what you pointed out, but Marx and Engels weren't LGBT+ friendly. Those who adopted their critique of capitalism also had liberal, "progressive" views about sexuality. Unlike Lenin, Stalin was essentially a National Socialist like Hitler, promoting socially conservative ideals which included condemning open homosexuality, and abortions of convenience. etc.

The most successful form of socialism, at a national level, was both Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Russia. Ironically Hitler and Stalin were at war with each other. The Third Reich made a fatal miscalculation with Operation Barbarossa. Hitler should've allied himself with the Stalinist Nationalists and deployed all of those troops in Western Europe. He made Stalin His enemy and lost the war.
Just what I thought, you are a fraud using a name like Christianman, and by your ramblings here you prove it daily.. In no way are you a Christian, no way.

So who it is that you might be(?), and why you chose this platform to spew your poison is interesting indeed.
 
Just what I thought, you are a fraud using a name like Christianman, and by your ramblings here you prove it daily.. In no way are you a Christian, no way.

So who it is that you might be(?), and why you chose this platform to spew your poison is interesting indeed.

That's what 'Zone 1' is for, protecting trolls.
 
MSN And i thought that the Marxists didnt like it when children were separated from their parents. Or is it, that the Marxists just dont like law abiding citizens who actually are parents and wont allow their underage children to mutilate themselves? Why did the left go bonkers when President Trump separated illegal immigrant children from the adults who brought them here(but may not have been the parents)?



So is this an attempt by the Marxists to legally kidnap children who live in Maine? Who ever is in charge, i do wonder bigly, is playing with fire, and they are going to be burned.


View attachment 892364
can this be true?


i doubt it
 

Forum List

Back
Top