MAGA Boom vs Bidenomics Bust

[BluesLegend]

Doesnt matter to the left.
All they care about is winning even though it harms them as much as it does everyone else.
They'll never admit to being wrong no matter how bad it gets.

The majority of those Dem losers are waiting for Dems to seize the 'rich' wealth and give them a handout.

 

[konradv]

Specifically please, give us examples of how he mishandled COVID-19.

Published February 1, 2020
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
By Joe McDonald, Sam McNeil | Associated Press
[...]
On Friday, the United States declared a public health emergency and President Donald Trump and an order barring entry to foreign nationals, other than immediate family of American citizens and permanent residents, who visited China within the last 14 days, which scientists say is the virus’s longest incubation period.

'Unfriendly comments'
China criticized the U.S. controls, which it said contradicted the WHO’s appeal to avoid travel bans, and “unfriendly comments” that Beijing was failing to cooperate.

“Just as the WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the U.S. rushed to go in the opposite way. Certainly not a gesture of goodwill,” said foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying.

WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in Geneva that despite the emergency declaration, there is “no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade.”
[...]
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'

China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'

###

Democrat Response to Coronavirus: End Trump’s Travel Bans on China, Iran
JOHN BINDER 11 Mar 2020 2:58

House and Senate Democrats are responding to the coronavirus outbreak in the United States by supporting measures to effectively strip President Trump of his authority to impose travel bans to protect American citizens.

While Trump has implemented travel bans on China and Iran — two of the most coronavirus-affected nations in the world — House Democrats are looking to roll back the president’s authority to enact travel bans from regions of the world.

Dems' Response to Coronavirus: End Trump's Travel Bans on China, Iran

###

Nolte: A Mere 8 Days Ago Joe Biden Was Still Attacking Trump’s Travel Bans
JOHN NOLTE 20 Mar 2020

A mere eight days ago, Joe Biden was still vocally opposing President Donald Trump’s travel bans from Europe, and even China, as racist. In other words, if Biden was the president, we can’t begin to imagine how much worse things would look in American today thanks to President Biden’s refusal to keep people out from the very same places where the Chinese coronavirus rages.

https://www.breitbart.com/.../nolte-mere-8-days-ago-joe.../

###

Nancy Pelosi visits San Francisco’s Chinatown to encourage people amid fears of coronavirus
by: Charles Clifford
Posted: Feb 24, 2020 / 05:57 PM PST / Updated: Feb 24, 2020 / 05:57 PM PST

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. (KRON) – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was in San Francisco on Monday spending several hours visiting Chinatown to encourage people to visit the shops and restaurants there amid fears of the coronavirus.

Business in Chinatown has really slowed down over the last month, mainly due to concerns about the coronavirus.

Pelosi did a walking tour of the area starting in the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Shop.

She also visited several other businesses and talked to people.

Neighbors, including the owner of the cookie shop, who says the last month has been difficult.

“Business is slow. People don’t want to come, they are scared,” Kevin Chan said.

Pelosi also took this opportunity to encourage people to come back to Chinatown.

“You should come to Chinatown. Precautions have been taken by our city. We know there is concern about tourism throughout the world but we think it’s very safe to be in Chinatown and hopefully, others will come,” Pelosi said.

Nancy Pelosi visits San Francisco’s Chinatown to encourage people amid fears of coronavirus

###

WATCH: NYC Mayor de Blasio Gets Nailed for Telling New Yorkers to Ignore the Wuhan Coronavirus
Beth Baumann
Posted: Mar 29, 2020 1:35 PM

On Sunday, CNN's Jake Tapper put New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) on blast for telling New Yorkers not to worry about the Wuhan coronavirus. Tapper played four separate clips of de Blasio encouraging New Yorkers to go about their daily lives, even as recently as March 13th, less than two weeks ago.

"In retrospect, is that message, at least in part, to blame for how rapidly the virus has spread across the city?" Tapper asked.

De Blasio instantly deflected.

"You know, Jake, we should not be focusing, in my view, on anything looking back, on any level of government right now," the mayor explained. "This is just about how we save lives going forward. We are all working – everybody – is working with the information we had and trying, of course, to avoid panic.

WATCH: NYC Mayor de Blasio Gets Nailed for Telling New Yorkers to Ignore the Wuhan Coronavirus

Boom.

townhall.com

###

Published March 18, 2020
WHO haunted by January tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus

The World Health Organization (WHO) is now haunted by a tweet it sent earlier this year when it cited Chinese health officials who claimed there had been no human transmissions of the novel coronavirus within the country yet.

The Jan. 14 tweet came less than two months before WHO declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic.

"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China," the organization had said.

It also relied on information from Chinese health authorities who have been accused of obscuring facts and figures during the course of the outbreak.

WHO haunted by January tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus

###

Nursing homes have ‘no right’ to reject coronavirus patients, Cuomo says
By Bernadette Hogan and Bruce Golding
April 23, 2020 | 5:04pm

New York’s nursing homes weren’t allowed to challenge a controversial order to admit patients with the coronavirus, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Thursday — even though it’s been blamed for spreading the deadly disease among residents

“They don’t have a right to object. That is the rule and that is the regulation and they have to comply with that,” Cuomo said during his daily briefing in Albany.

Nursing homes have ‘no right’ to reject coronavirus patients, Cuomo says

“They don’t have a right to object. That is the rule and that is the regulation and they have to comply with that,” Cuomo said during his daily briefing in Albany.

nypost.com

###

New York’s true nursing home death toll cloaked in secrecy
By BERNARD CONDON, MATT SEDENSKY and MEGHAN HOYER August 11, 2020

New York’s coronavirus death toll in nursing homes, already among the highest in the nation, could actually be a significant undercount. Unlike every other state with major outbreaks, New York only counts residents who died on nursing home property and not those who were transported to hospitals and died there.

That statistic could add thousands to the state’s official care home death toll of just over 6,600. But so far the administration of Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo has refused to divulge the number, leading to speculation the state is manipulating the figures to make it appear it is doing better than other states and to make a tragic situation less dire.

“That’s a problem, bro,” state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, a Democrat, told New York Health Commissioner Howard Zucker during a legislative hearing on nursing homes earlier this month. “It seems, sir, that in this case you are choosing to define it differently so that you can look better.”

New York’s true nursing home death toll cloaked in secrecy

NEW YORK (AP) — Riverdale Nursing Home in the Bronx appears, on paper, to have escaped the worst of the coronavirus pandemic, with an official state count of just four deaths in its 146-bed facility.

apnews.com

###

He called for ‘Warp Speed’ on the vaccine, then shit o the result.

 

[konradv]

Then get out of the kitchen, because you’re going to be really triggered when you see Trump in orange.

 

[konradv]

Blaming others is a Dim specialty

Taking credit for the work of others is a Trump specialty.

 

[scruffy]

Taking credit for the work of others is a Trump specialty.

Sure, Mr. I saw the bridge collapse.

 

[YoursTruly]

$2 gas

1% inflation

0 foreign wars

You're not up on economic ups & downs and oil boom & bust cycles, are ya? Just blame the left when things are bad and praise the right when things are good.

That's not even close to reality.

There was some good times, with cheap gas under Obama. There may even be time under Biden's term. If/when it happens are you going to praise Biden (for something he has almost nothing to do with)?

The government, under every president since I've been voting, floods the economy with new money. This creates an economic down turn. Then "we the people," the ones who really run the economy, adjust to it and fix it ourselves.

"We the people" fix what the government, including Trump have made worse. Biden is making it worse, and we'll fix it too.

When it comes to oil/gas, we're all at the mercy of the oil companies and their investors. Along with the futures market. Ever so often, they go into a bust cycle, where they produce less, but make more. FFS, we've been through like 8 or 10 of these cycles since we got serious about exploration and production. And you're still under the delusion that the president is in charge of that.

Here's a help. Oil/Gas in the US isn't state owned. The president, any of them, can't force them to produce more. Nor can they force them out of a bust cycle. They'll do it when they want and for as long as they want. Those oil CEO's who make million $$$ bonuses aren't going to take orders from someone who makes $500K per year salary.
We are just the oil companies customers. We're not their friends. They're not patriotic. They're in it for the money and ONLY the money.

 

[YoursTruly]

Taking credit for the work of others is a Trump specialty.

You ain't kidding. They give Trump credit for the Supreme Court judges, when it was McConnell that got them seated.

 

[TheYellowKing]

Housing starts are up over 6% which means the economy is booming!

No it means you're an idiot

 

[bripat9643]

Yep.

There was no "obama wave" nor a "Trump recession."

 

[bripat9643]

He called for ‘Warp Speed’ on the vaccine, then shit o the result.

How did he "shit on the result?"

 

[bripat9643]

You ain't kidding. They give Trump credit for the Supreme Court judges, when it was McConnell that got them seated.

Trump nominated them, moron.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Then by all means explain to us what really is happening in your own words

1) How much impact does a President have in their first three months?

2) What exactly did these people do to change the situation? Or did they change the situation? Probably not. So, let's look at what was happening BEFORE they became president.

Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

data.bls.gov

I'm going to use unemployment rates here. I'm not sure where Fox got their stats from, but it's more or less the same thing.

Trump got into the presidency at 4.7% unemployment.

The three months before he took office unemployment had dropped -0.2%, his first three months it dropped -0.3%. So, did Trump push unemployment to drop around 50% more?

The next three months is dropped -0.1%. The next three months it didn't drop at all.

Probably not. The unemployment rate goes up and down quite a bit. The first three months of 2013, for example, went down -0.5%, the next three months stayed the same. What does it prove? Not much.

There are so many things happening, no one person can control this. Yes, they can pump the economy and make things "better". But that ends up with Boom and Bust which is worse for the poorer people and better for the rich.

 

[bripat9643]

1) How much impact does a President have in their first three months?

2) What exactly did these people do to change the situation? Or did they change the situation? Probably not. So, let's look at what was happening BEFORE they became president.

Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

data.bls.gov

I'm going to use unemployment rates here. I'm not sure where Fox got their stats from, but it's more or less the same thing.

Trump got into the presidency at 4.7% unemployment.

The three months before he took office unemployment had dropped -0.2%, his first three months it dropped -0.3%. So, did Trump push unemployment to drop around 50% more?

The next three months is dropped -0.1%. The next three months it didn't drop at all.

Probably not. The unemployment rate goes up and down quite a bit. The first three months of 2013, for example, went down -0.5%, the next three months stayed the same. What does it prove? Not much.

There are so many things happening, no one person can control this. Yes, they can pump the economy and make things "better". But that ends up with Boom and Bust which is worse for the poorer people and better for the rich.

3.5% unemployment is so low that it's impossible for it to go any lower.

Bad theory.

 

[Markle]

He called for ‘Warp Speed’ on the vaccine, then shit o the result.

Try again.

 

[my2¢]

So, if the economic numbers presented covering the first 30 months of presidency are relevant today, is it accepted that similar facts covering the first 42 months be just as relevant a year from now?

 

[Markle]

So, if the economic numbers presented covering the first 30 months of presidency are relevant today, is it accepted that similar facts covering the first 42 months be just as relevant a year from now?

 

[YoursTruly]

Trump nominated them, moron.

That's all Trump did. Turtle head McConnell is the one that did all the work to get them seated.
This is just another instance of Trump getting praised for shit he had very little to do with, because you people have been conned.

Conned so bad, you don't even realize just how much of a democrat Trump still is.

 

[konradv]

Try again.

Memer, memer!

 

[Ringo]

Credit card debt is up.
Food prices are up.
Rent prices are up.
Suicide rates are up.
Homelessness is up.
People in this country are struggling to survive—which means you have to be a rich liberal or completely propagandized by the Democrats to believe Bidenomics is working.

 

[22lcidw]

You're not up on economic ups & downs and oil boom & bust cycles, are ya? Just blame the left when things are bad and praise the right when things are good.

That's not even close to reality.

There was some good times, with cheap gas under Obama. There may even be time under Biden's term. If/when it happens are you going to praise Biden (for something he has almost nothing to do with)?

The government, under every president since I've been voting, floods the economy with new money. This creates an economic down turn. Then "we the people," the ones who really run the economy, adjust to it and fix it ourselves.

"We the people" fix what the government, including Trump have made worse. Biden is making it worse, and we'll fix it too.

When it comes to oil/gas, we're all at the mercy of the oil companies and their investors. Along with the futures market. Ever so often, they go into a bust cycle, where they produce less, but make more. FFS, we've been through like 8 or 10 of these cycles since we got serious about exploration and production. And you're still under the delusion that the president is in charge of that.

Here's a help. Oil/Gas in the US isn't state owned. The president, any of them, can't force them to produce more. Nor can they force them out of a bust cycle. They'll do it when they want and for as long as they want. Those oil CEO's who make million $$$ bonuses aren't going to take orders from someone who makes $500K per year salary.
We are just the oil companies customers. We're not their friends. They're not patriotic. They're in it for the money and ONLY the money.

When it comes to oil it is not getting in the way. No roadblocks. So instead of a pipeline wet trains transporting oil. A roadblock. An extra cost. Instead of continuing to give rights to drill for oil with expanding opportunities, we get a stoppage of that even with opportunities to drill still valid from past decisions. At extra cost. As peasants we are in the middle. We know now that we must flood the market with oil and products derived from it. Foreign problems in any way affect the costs also. So, OPEC is now dictating again due to old Joe and the progressive socialists. You know, the ones who are for the peons. Joe is a Delaware corporate stooge.