SuperDemocrat
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 8,200
- 868
- 275
- Banned
- #1
It seems that "liberal" America has once again found an argument to legitimize censoring anti abortion speech. In the aftermath of the planned parenthood murders the left was on cnn saying how "right wing" rhetoric lead this man to killing those people. This creates an argument that such speech should be censored for public safety and if the public bites they may begin the push for such a thing. It is fortunate that theublic isn't listening to this but there is something to consider. What if These people really didn't believe that other people who have oppossing opinions should have the right to speak at all? These people are kind of a throwback to the 1700s. They can't just come out and say that because they know that won't be accepted by the public but, because they are crafty, they devised a good argument that can get the public to go along with any attempt to block people from speaking out. That argument is public safety. What if these people are not as liberal as they say they are?
The same thing was done by president Clinton in 94 after the Oklahoma bombing. It was Rush Limbaugh anti government talk that caused it--remember? It is like someone is purposely crafting these arguments in order to silent oppossing voices. That is the only possible outcome that these arguments can have.
What if this talk did cause these terrible things to happen? What would you propose to do about it? The only logical step would then be to attempt to silence such talk and that is exactly where these arguments are taking us and why they are made in the first place.
The same thing was done by president Clinton in 94 after the Oklahoma bombing. It was Rush Limbaugh anti government talk that caused it--remember? It is like someone is purposely crafting these arguments in order to silent oppossing voices. That is the only possible outcome that these arguments can have.
What if this talk did cause these terrible things to happen? What would you propose to do about it? The only logical step would then be to attempt to silence such talk and that is exactly where these arguments are taking us and why they are made in the first place.