Looks like Obama was correct about Benghazi

[Camp]

Select committees are jokes. They are rarely taken seriously. They give opportunities to majority members and minority members to write separate reports that more often than not give totally partisan conclusions of the subject of the committee. The kicker is that the tax payer foots the bill for printing up almost unlimited amounts of these reports that look like very official documents in book form. Of course they also get printed online and thus become quoted by the opposing sides endlessly as if they were indeed, official government conclusions when they are nothing of the sort. If there is such a thing as official government propaganda, Select Committee Report on......is at the top of the list.

 

[mudwhistle]

So, just to recap....

Obama and Hillary both get accused of apathy, because of the attack in Benghazi.

Benghazi is not actually an embassy nor a consulate, but rather a CIA outpost.

No one was told to "stand down," but instead told not to attempt coming all that way just to be far too late to help.

The actual battle did not span seven hours, instead the fighting (two separate attacks) lasted only several minutes.

Fake pictures surface of an American, supposedly being tortured, are latter found to be from Canada!!!

Stevens, the guy who spilled these beans in the first place, LIED about being punished with a transfer after it was discovered that HE requested it.

Obama was in fact NOT SLEEPING, because Rush Limburger is too stupid to realize that it was 10 O'clock at night in Libya, but 4 PM in DC!

Obama ... accused of doing nothing to help ... was in reality, briefed within the hour, instructing the military to do 'whatever was necessary.'

A Republican led investigation found no wrong doing.




Oh, but NOW we finally have the evidence to impeach Obama, that thus far, had eluded everyone!

Nice ... I'm not buying.

Crying wolf for two years has done irreversible damage to my tenuous belief that ANYTHING other than a partisan witch-hunt was afoot, here.

But Dude, it was like, two years ago.

Obama told everyone to do what was necessary, but what was necessary seems elusive. Obama walked away, got the hell out of there, and nobody knows where he was. Obama's team of experts decided to do nothing, and instead dreamed up a false narrative and stuck to it knowing they were full of crap.

So it depends on your perspective.

 

[mudwhistle]

Select committees are jokes. They are rarely taken seriously. They give opportunities to majority members and minority members to write separate reports that more often than not give totally partisan conclusions of the subject of the committee. The kicker is that the tax payer foots the bill for printing up almost unlimited amounts of these reports that look like very official documents in book form. Of course they also get printed online and thus become quoted by the opposing sides endlessly as if they were indeed, official government conclusions when they are nothing of the sort. If there is such a thing as official government propaganda, Select Committee Report on......is at the top of the list.

Yeah, total waste of time.

Terrible waste of money. But so is everything Obam proposes.

 

[mudwhistle]

Bump.

Stupid Bump

This makes rw look really stupid......and you bump it.

It is the truth

There were protests going on throughout the Muslim world that day and Benghazi was no different

Terrorist took advantage of the protests to stag an attack and Republicans took advantage of the terrorist attack for political gain

Yeah, but Obama got Bin Laden, so case closed.....

 

[Zander]

It was a YouTube video!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[whitehall]

Did the Times manage to dig up one a-hole who claimed he was offended by an obscure you tube video? The Times is worse than pathetic.

 

[Lenore]

Surprise surprise. The New York Times defends Obama.

Obviously, the rest of the world is mistaken. The NYT has such a golden record when it comes to exposing the truth about the current admin.

 

[natstew]

Warning! Warning!
Arguing with liberals could have a lowering effect on your IQ!!

 

[Uncensored2008]

It was a YouTube video!

That the Muzzie Beasts played on the asshole of their camels..

 

[mudwhistle]

So, just to recap....

Obama and Hillary both get accused of apathy, because of the attack in Benghazi.

Benghazi is not actually an embassy nor a consulate, but rather a CIA outpost.

No one was told to "stand down," but instead told not to attempt coming all that way just to be far too late to help.

The actual battle did not span seven hours, instead the fighting (two separate attacks) lasted only several minutes.

Fake pictures surface of an American, supposedly being tortured, are latter found to be from Canada!!!

Stevens, the guy who spilled these beans in the first place, LIED about being punished with a transfer after it was discovered that HE requested it.

Obama was in fact NOT SLEEPING, because Rush Limburger is too stupid to realize that it was 10 O'clock at night in Libya, but 4 PM in DC!

Obama ... accused of doing nothing to help ... was in reality, briefed within the hour, instructing the military to do 'whatever was necessary.'

A Republican led investigation found no wrong doing.




Oh, but NOW we finally have the evidence to impeach Obama, that thus far, had eluded everyone!

Nice ... I'm not buying.

Crying wolf for two years has done irreversible damage to my tenuous belief that ANYTHING other than a partisan witch-hunt was afoot, here.

That's the spin.

Nice to have the facts hidden so long so you can make all of these false claims.

Televise the hearings and all of the misinformation will fall by the wayside.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Select committees are jokes. They are rarely taken seriously. They give opportunities to majority members and minority members to write separate reports that more often than not give totally partisan conclusions of the subject of the committee. The kicker is that the tax payer foots the bill for printing up almost unlimited amounts of these reports that look like very official documents in book form. Of course they also get printed online and thus become quoted by the opposing sides endlessly as if they were indeed, official government conclusions when they are nothing of the sort. If there is such a thing as official government propaganda, Select Committee Report on......is at the top of the list.

You mean like the Watergate select committee. Oh, but that one had repubs asking the tough question of a repub admin. You won't see any dems do the same for this one. Because they are not Americans. They are subversives.

 

[Uncensored2008]

 

[HUGGY]

So what? Did anyone come to harm because there was some initial conflict over the first reports about the incident in Benghazi?

FOX news intentionally lies to the public every single day. What is your point?

 

[srlip]

Dems voted, to a man, for obamacare, not a single Republican voted for it. We KNOW clinton is all for it, and we know it sucks and can't be funded. We know clinton is a scumbag who should have been locked up 20years ago, for travelgate, insider trading, etc. Dems voted, to a man, to not convict the MALE clinton, even tho it was proven beyond a doubt that he'd lied to Congress (which is a FELONY) dems will vote for an old yeller dog if he's a Dem, for a fact.

 

[d_tyler]

Can you honestly ask that question with a straight face?

Physical harm....the damage had already been done. Brave soldiers were dead...along with US Ambassador Stevens. What more harm do you need? It doesn't matter what the lie was ... it was the fact that the initial reports were FABRICATED!!!!

Let's do it this way... Your son is killed in a gang fight at a club. He's stabbed over a dozen times. The owner of the club tells the two bouncer / security guys to NOT call the police officers that are just down the block. Your son and 3 of his friends are dead. In a search for answers, the investigators are not allowed to speak with the bouncers and witnesses. The owner of the club insists that the fight broke out because your son knows somebody who said something disrespectful about somebody that the guy with the knife knows. He even goes on TV the next day and says it happened due to somebody saying the wrong thing. No details...no accountability. But all appearances of the security camera video shows that 10 gang members methodically selected your son and 3 friends and killed them in a cold blooded attack.

Are you gonna accept that?

Now, let's say you get a call from NY Times and they tell you that they interviewed over 100 people who say that there was no gang related activity surrounding this event.

Are you still ok with this?


It's funny that you accuse FOX of lies when you believe the BS that comes out of the WH.

 

[mudwhistle]

So what? Did anyone come to harm because there was some initial conflict over the first reports about the incident in Benghazi?

FOX news intentionally lies to the public every single day. What is your point?

Oh, so somebody has to die before it's a crime....

Keep moving the goalposts.

 

[HUGGY]

Can you honestly ask that question with a straight face?

Physical harm....the damage had already been done. Brave soldiers were dead...along with US Ambassador Stevens. What more harm do you need? It doesn't matter what the lie was ... it was the fact that the initial reports were FABRICATED!!!!

Let's do it this way... Your son is killed in a gang fight at a club. He's stabbed over a dozen times. The owner of the club tells the two bouncer / security guys to NOT call the police officers that are just down the block. Your son and 3 of his friends are dead. In a search for answers, the investigators are not allowed to speak with the bouncers and witnesses. The owner of the club insists that the fight broke out because your son knows somebody who said something disrespectful about somebody that the guy with the knife knows. He even goes on TV the next day and says it happened due to somebody saying the wrong thing. No details...no accountability. But all appearances of the security camera video shows that 10 gang members methodically selected your son and 3 friends and killed them in a cold blooded attack.

Are you gonna accept that?

Now, let's say you get a call from NY Times and they tell you that they interviewed over 100 people who say that there was no gang related activity surrounding this event.

Are you still ok with this?


It's funny that you accuse FOX of lies when you believe the BS that comes out of the WH.

I believe the white house should have said "we will wait to comment until more facts have surfaced" before making any seemingly factual statements.

There was no criminal intent nor intentional miss use of the events that occured in Benghazi. You people are so seperated from reality in an effort to make Obama look bad that you have lost all grip on what is important in our country. You are mentally ill. Seek help.

 

[tinydancer]

Can you honestly ask that question with a straight face?

Physical harm....the damage had already been done. Brave soldiers were dead...along with US Ambassador Stevens. What more harm do you need? It doesn't matter what the lie was ... it was the fact that the initial reports were FABRICATED!!!!

Let's do it this way... Your son is killed in a gang fight at a club. He's stabbed over a dozen times. The owner of the club tells the two bouncer / security guys to NOT call the police officers that are just down the block. Your son and 3 of his friends are dead. In a search for answers, the investigators are not allowed to speak with the bouncers and witnesses. The owner of the club insists that the fight broke out because your son knows somebody who said something disrespectful about somebody that the guy with the knife knows. He even goes on TV the next day and says it happened due to somebody saying the wrong thing. No details...no accountability. But all appearances of the security camera video shows that 10 gang members methodically selected your son and 3 friends and killed them in a cold blooded attack.

Are you gonna accept that?

Now, let's say you get a call from NY Times and they tell you that they interviewed over 100 people who say that there was no gang related activity surrounding this event.

Are you still ok with this?


It's funny that you accuse FOX of lies when you believe the BS that comes out of the WH.

I believe the white house should have said "we will wait to comment until more facts have surfaced" before making any seemingly factual statements.

There was no criminal intent nor intentional miss use of the events that occured in Benghazi. You people are so seperated from reality in an effort to make Obama look bad that you have lost all grip on what is important in our country. You are mentally ill. Seek help.

They couldn't let anyone know it was a terror attack. Obama had vanquished Al Qaeda after all.

The Pentagon knew it was a terror attack immediately.

Pentagon labeled Benghazi a terrorist attack as Obama administration wavered: newly declassified testimony

Gen. Carter Ham’s newly declassified testimony before the House suggests the prospect of an out-of-control demonstration was not raised by Defense officials and that they immediately considered the incident an attack.

BY Leslie Larson
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Published: Tuesday, January 14, 2014, 1:23 PM
Updated: Tuesday, January 14, 2014, 1:23 PM

From the testimony:

"There was no question in my mind that this was a terrorist attack," Panetta said of his early assessment of the situation on the ground in Benghazi.

Pentagon labeled Benghazi a terrorist attack as Obama administration wavered: newly declassified testimony - NY Daily News

 

[tinydancer]

The interference is obvious in the Nuland emails. This has been already been out front and center. It was an election year after all and this was politics at its worst.

Leaked emails show that then State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland suggested that a CIA memo on Benghazi not include any reference of links to al-Qaeda and the intelligence warnings in the months preceding the attack.

Nuland wrote in protest to the CIA description, saying it "could be abused by members (of Congress) to beat up on the State Department for not paying attention to warnings," in an email to the White House and the CIA, according to ABC.

Pentagon labeled Benghazi a terrorist attack as Obama administration wavered: newly declassified testimony - NY Daily News

 

[d_tyler]

Can you honestly ask that question with a straight face?

Physical harm....the damage had already been done. Brave soldiers were dead...along with US Ambassador Stevens. What more harm do you need? It doesn't matter what the lie was ... it was the fact that the initial reports were FABRICATED!!!!

Let's do it this way... Your son is killed in a gang fight at a club. He's stabbed over a dozen times. The owner of the club tells the two bouncer / security guys to NOT call the police officers that are just down the block. Your son and 3 of his friends are dead. In a search for answers, the investigators are not allowed to speak with the bouncers and witnesses. The owner of the club insists that the fight broke out because your son knows somebody who said something disrespectful about somebody that the guy with the knife knows. He even goes on TV the next day and says it happened due to somebody saying the wrong thing. No details...no accountability. But all appearances of the security camera video shows that 10 gang members methodically selected your son and 3 friends and killed them in a cold blooded attack.

Are you gonna accept that?

Now, let's say you get a call from NY Times and they tell you that they interviewed over 100 people who say that there was no gang related activity surrounding this event.

Are you still ok with this?


It's funny that you accuse FOX of lies when you believe the BS that comes out of the WH.

I believe the white house should have said "we will wait to comment until more facts have surfaced" before making any seemingly factual statements.

There was no criminal intent nor intentional miss use of the events that occured in Benghazi. You people are so seperated from reality in an effort to make Obama look bad that you have lost all grip on what is important in our country. You are mentally ill. Seek help.

Anytime a federal agency takes steps to lie to the American people in an attempt to cover up something, there is criminal intent. Anytime false information is produced to shroud the truth, there is criminal intent.

No one here is mentally ill...not even you. But you do need help recognizing a cover up when you stare at one.