You have a hard time with honesty and arguing with the actual facts. You have to move goal posts when you're in a cornerIf you read the board's guidelines you could post a link and not have it deleted....thatYou could have/should have posted the entire ARS13-405 and not just half of it and leaving out the partYou didn't read far enough.
13-407. Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises
A. A person or his agent in lawful possession or control of premises is justified in threatening to use deadly physical force or in threatening or using physical force against another when and to the extent that a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of a criminal trespass by the other person in or upon the premises.
B. A person may use deadly physical force under subsection A only in the defense of himself or third persons as described in sections 13-405 and 13-406.
C. In this section, "premises" means any real property and any structure, movable or immovable, permanent or temporary, adapted for both human residence and lodging whether occupied or not.
Also you omitted from ARS 13-405
B. A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act.
you really need to be more honest in your posting greenhornet
How do you think I was dishonest?
that would have cleared up what you muddied.
I posted the link....thus everyone could read it. I have posted long articles before and got them removed for being tooooo long.
is, if you can read
I posted the link. You seem to have some sort of reading/comprehension problem?
I've shown the professor his error using his own site.