Lone woman shoots 2 home invasion suspect dead

[Snouter]

Folks, I would give the Negro or assorted Blacks and Browns a chance to run after I indicate I will only shoot if the savage(s) do not run. There is no way I want my ears subjected to the .357 magnums in my home protection revolver unless the savage(s)( insist on coming closer. And the fucking blood and shit will upset my cat.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Wow! I googled their names.

This group calls HIM a victim of gun violence!

Corey Teixeira, age 18

Never give the left political power!
.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If they were unarmed...she might be in trouble.

A person need not be armed for the use of deadly force to be legal.

 

[Meister]

Armed or unarmed, if they are in the home uninvited at 3:45am, it's open season

 

[Meister]

If they were unarmed...she might be in trouble.

Not if it was a B&E, good grief

 

[Intolerant]

Teixeira That’s an unusual last name.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Armed or unarmed, if they are in the home uninvited at 3:45am, it's open season

Depends on where you live.


A Texas man fatally shoots intruder and then goes back to bed - CNN

 

[Meister]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Folks, I would give the Negro or assorted Blacks and Browns a chance to run after I indicate I will only shoot if the savage(s) do not run. There is no way I want my ears subjected to the .357 magnums in my home protection revolver unless the savage(s)( insist on coming closer. And the fucking blood and shit will upset my cat.

Homeowner Charged With Killing Burglar - SouthJersey.com

 

[TheGreenHornet]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

CAN I USE LETHAL FORCE TO DEFEND MY HOME? | Ryan Pacyga Criminal Defense | Minneapolis, MN

 

[Meister]

Will she be charged with murder.....one of the perps name was Muhammed...ya know what that means.

This was in Arizona ....Lone Woman Shoots Home Invasion Suspect Dead

When is deadly force for self defense in Arizona justified?


Under ARS 13-405, the use of deadly force is sometimes permitted in Arizona. However, it’s limited to narrow circumstances. You can only use deadly force if you’re in reasonable fear of immediate serious physical injury or death. In order to lawfully use deadly force against someone, a reasonable person, in the defendant’s position, would need to believe that deadly force was immediately necessary to protect against potentially deadly force. That’s because self-defense must always be reasonable, proportional, and immediately necessary. Unless you’re faced with the immediate threat of serious physical injury or death, you cannot use deadly force.

You didn't read far enough.

13-407. Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises

A. A person or his agent in lawful possession or control of premises is justified in threatening to use deadly physical force or in threatening or using physical force against another when and to the extent that a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of a criminal trespass by the other person in or upon the premises.

B. A person may use deadly physical force under subsection A only in the defense of himself or third persons as described in sections 13-405 and 13-406.

C. In this section, "premises" means any real property and any structure, movable or immovable, permanent or temporary, adapted for both human residence and lodging whether occupied or not.

Also you omitted from ARS 13-405

B. A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act.

you really need to be more honest in your posting greenhornet

 

[westwall]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

CAN I USE LETHAL FORCE TO DEFEND MY HOME? | Ryan Pacyga Criminal Defense | Minneapolis, MN

Funny how you advocate for criminals. You must be one.

 

[Meister]

Folks, I would give the Negro or assorted Blacks and Browns a chance to run after I indicate I will only shoot if the savage(s) do not run. There is no way I want my ears subjected to the .357 magnums in my home protection revolver unless the savage(s)( insist on coming closer. And the fucking blood and shit will upset my cat.

Homeowner Charged With Killing Burglar - SouthJersey.com

Come back and talk to me when he has been convicted, okay?

 

[Meister]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

CAN I USE LETHAL FORCE TO DEFEND MY HOME? | Ryan Pacyga Criminal Defense | Minneapolis, MN

How does this help your premise?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Teixeira That’s an unusual last name.

Portuguese. I looked it up

 

[TheGreenHornet]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

CAN I USE LETHAL FORCE TO DEFEND MY HOME? | Ryan Pacyga Criminal Defense | Minneapolis, MN

How does this help your premise?

what premise are you talking about?

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Folks, I would give the Negro or assorted Blacks and Browns a chance to run after I indicate I will only shoot if the savage(s) do not run. There is no way I want my ears subjected to the .357 magnums in my home protection revolver unless the savage(s)( insist on coming closer. And the fucking blood and shit will upset my cat.

Homeowner Charged With Killing Burglar - SouthJersey.com

Come back and talk to me when he has been convicted, okay?

?

Would you want to be in his shoes.? Too many folks walk around with a pistol in their pocket and have no idea ofthe law on self defense where they live.

every State has different laws regarding what amount of force you can use to defend your home. Some States require you to retreat before you use any force. Others do not. Some States limit the amount of force you can use depending on the circumstances. Others do not.

Not even to mention the fact the law can be on your side but the jury still may convict you.

With all the anti gun hysterial these days and the media ready to demonize anyone who uses a weapon it is becoming a crap shoot in regards to whether you are entitled to use lethal force to defend your life or your property.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

CAN I USE LETHAL FORCE TO DEFEND MY HOME? | Ryan Pacyga Criminal Defense | Minneapolis, MN

Funny how you advocate for criminals. You must be one.

hehheh How am I advocating for criminals?....I am just trying to point out the law on self defense iand how it s different from state to state and the perils of using lethal force to defend your life or your property in these times of political correctness and double standards depending on your ethnicity.

A fellow I know just got 20yrs for defending his life with a pistol....and this was in florida which actually has good law on self defense.....stand your ground and all that.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Will she be charged with murder.....one of the perps name was Muhammed...ya know what that means.

This was in Arizona ....Lone Woman Shoots Home Invasion Suspect Dead

When is deadly force for self defense in Arizona justified?


Under ARS 13-405, the use of deadly force is sometimes permitted in Arizona. However, it’s limited to narrow circumstances. You can only use deadly force if you’re in reasonable fear of immediate serious physical injury or death. In order to lawfully use deadly force against someone, a reasonable person, in the defendant’s position, would need to believe that deadly force was immediately necessary to protect against potentially deadly force. That’s because self-defense must always be reasonable, proportional, and immediately necessary. Unless you’re faced with the immediate threat of serious physical injury or death, you cannot use deadly force.

You didn't read far enough.

13-407. Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises

A. A person or his agent in lawful possession or control of premises is justified in threatening to use deadly physical force or in threatening or using physical force against another when and to the extent that a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of a criminal trespass by the other person in or upon the premises.

B. A person may use deadly physical force under subsection A only in the defense of himself or third persons as described in sections 13-405 and 13-406.

C. In this section, "premises" means any real property and any structure, movable or immovable, permanent or temporary, adapted for both human residence and lodging whether occupied or not.

Also you omitted from ARS 13-405

B. A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act.

you really need to be more honest in your posting greenhornet

How do you think I was dishonest?

 

[westwall]

I really don't think so. All a person would have to do is look for a really old lady, not have a weapon
and break in to her place at 3:45 in the morning and that lady can't do anything to him? Really?
That's what you want everybody to believe? Now remember, in the dark that lady does not know
if the perp is armed or not. Does she wait for the shot in the dark?

Now that you said it, show us where breaking and entering a private residence can't be met with a gun.

CAN I USE LETHAL FORCE TO DEFEND MY HOME? | Ryan Pacyga Criminal Defense | Minneapolis, MN

Funny how you advocate for criminals. You must be one.

hehheh How am I advocating for criminals?....I am just trying to point out the law on self defense iand how it s different from state to state and the perils of using lethal force to defend your life or your property in these times of political correctness and double standards depending on your ethnicity.

A fellow I know just got 20yrs for defending his life with a pistol....and this was in florida which actually has good law on self defense.....stand your ground and all that.

Yeah, you know what, we already know all of that. You seem upset that criminals are getting killed so are trying to frighten people into not killing them.

That's stupid.