Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And I always noticed a liberal bias in Bryant Gumble's sports reporting
And I always noticed a liberal bias in Bryant Gumble's sports reporting
I will admit that I don't get a right wing vibe from a lot of the people she listed, but that doesn't make them liberal. That's another trick from the GOP.
If it aint conservative, then label it liberal.
I just want to take this opportunity to point out that the media is not liberal. If it were, where is our version of Rush?
Randi Rhodes is the closest thing we have, and the Corporate Radio Station she works for fired her.
And don't tell us Chris Matthews is liberal, because he sucks, and we don't want him.
So basically, Corporate Right Wing Republicans pick who we get to listen to. And they pick what those "celebrities" get to talk about on the air.
And every "liberal" political show always seems to have on a guest like Rove, Delay, Newt or Pat Buchanan on, so the Republicans always get their say, even on liberal shows.
where is your equivilant to Rush you ask? why dear that would be bobble necked maddow and olberman throws paper breaks glass on MSNBC what a bunch of crybabies.. jeez
They might be the counter to the guys on Fox News, but who is our radio version of Rush?
We don't get one. That's because the media has been purchased and taken over by the Republican party.
And when you give us a token spokesman, it's a pussy like Ed Schultz or Bill Press.
Randi Rhodes beat Rush in head to head markets.
Ah, explaining it to you is like explaining why your cooter is so full of yeast. Why bother explaining when its not going to change anything.
Can you show me that Rather, Couric, Brokaw or Jennings, or Koppel or Rooney are considered liberals?
And I always noticed a liberal bias in Bryant Gumble's sports reporting
And I always noticed a liberal bias in Bryant Gumble's sports reporting
You really are a moron aren't ya sis? I mean we kid each other about how stupid you people are... but you're the genuine Article...
Gumble is a longstanding leftist media personality... 'reporting' on the Today Show for a generation and other not so notable efforts at be 'taken seriously'... and after a while he returned to the heady intellectual heights of Sports.
Listnership determines who gets radio airtime. On broadband TV, entrenched Liberals determine that Conservatives get no air time, thus the success of FOX.They fired her because of her foul mouth.I just want to take this opportunity to point out that the media is not liberal. If it were, where is our version of Rush?
Randi Rhodes is the closest thing we have, and the Corporate Radio Station she works for fired her.
[qupte]And don't tell us Chris Matthews is liberal, because he sucks, and we don't want him.
So basically, Corporate Right Wing Republicans pick who we get to listen to. And they pick what those "celebrities" get to talk about on the air.
Not true.And every "liberal" political show always seems to have on a guest like Rove, Delay, Newt or Pat Buchanan on, so the Republicans always get their say, even on liberal shows.
You should have a glass belly button, so when your head is so far up your behind you can see what the rest of us are doing.
Liberal media is all you can find in the main stream. No right-wingers pick your radio, only listenership does that.
Left-wing Liberals:
Dan Rather, Katie Couric, Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings, Edward R. Murrow, Ted Koppel, Andy Rooney, Leslie Stahl, George Stephanopoulos, Mike Wallace, Barbara Walters, Ed Bradley, Campbell Brown, Jack Cafferty, Walter Cronkite, Jim Lehrer, Roger Grimsby, Soledad OBrien, Keith Olbermann, Cokie Roberts, Diane Sawyer, Bob Schieffer, Paula Zahn, Sam Donaldson, Brian Williams, Judy Woodruff, David Shuster, Bernard Shaw, Jessica Savitch, Harry Reasoner, Sally Quinn, Gwen Ifill, Douglas Kiker, Charles Kuralt, Roger Mudd, Robert MacNeil, Charles Osgood, Douglas Edwards, John Chancellor, Charles Gibson, Christiane Amanpour, Anderson Cooper, Ann Curry, Marvin Kalb, Bryant Gimbel, Andrea Mitchell, Jeanne Moos, Bill Schneider, Daniel Schoor, Richard Threlkeld, Jake Tapper, Ann Compton, Lester Holt, Michael Beschloss.
Can I see a similar list of Conservatives?
Do you not know that Stephanopoulos worked in the Clinton Administration, (Matthews also worked for Democrats, as did Jim Lehrer) and is still known to huddle with Democrat planners.These are mainstream media types. Certainly not liberal.
Do you even watch George Stephanopoulos' show? What is liberal about it?
CNN is clearly left wing, See definition above. Certainly you do not watch everything if you do not know those I mentioned above. Every one has been around for years if not decades.Tell me something left wing that Anderson Cooper said recently.
I don't even know who half of these people are, and I watch everything.
So I'm a flaming liberal and I can't even agree on one of your choices.
You think centrists are liberals. This is great!!! [/quote} Again, if they supported Obama and voted same and are registered Democrats, yes.
If wacko means Conservative, yes.I don't get a right wing or left wing slant from ABC, CBS or NBC. You might, but that's because you are a wacko.
I believe that I explainded why Conservatives dominate talk radio: listeners.The radio trade magazine Talkers has released its annual "Heavy Hundred" list of the top talk hosts, and probably the easiest two selections were No. 1 and No. 2: Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
Limbaugh and Hannity, who are also the country's two most popular talk hosts, run back-to-back daily, noon-3 p.m. and 3-6 p.m. respectively, on their flagship station WABC (770 AM).
WABC also carries Talkers' No. 6 host, Laura Ingraham, and its No. 7 host, morning man Imus.
Coming in at No. 3 is the hot Michael Savage, heard locally on WOR (710 AM), followed at No. 4 by Dr. Laura Schlessinger, who is heard on WMCA (570 AM) and WWDJ (970 AM).
The rest of the top 10 are not currently on major stations around here: Glenn Beck at No. 5, Ed Schultz at No. 8, Mike Gallagher at No. 9 and Neal Boortz at No. 10.
Schultz is the only progressive in the top 10.
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity still rule in the talk radio game
The rightists don't get to define what the left is..the left does
Likewise the lefties don't get to tell Righties what they believe.
About half the ascii wasted here is some right winger tell us what the left stands for and geting it wrong.
The other half is lefties telling righties what they beleive and ALSO getting it wrong.
If some of you would stop presuming what others actually think these discussion, and actually start READING what others are truly saying, this board would be far less contentious and far more productive, in my opinion.
But the urge to turn people into caracatures, the desire for the intellectually challenged to argue with straw men of their own devices, is just too much a part of the human nature of nitwits for that to ever happen.
I just want to take this opportunity to point out that the media is not liberal. If it were, where is our version of Rush?
Randi Rhodes is the closest thing we have, and the Corporate Radio Station she works for fired her.
And don't tell us Chris Matthews is liberal, because he sucks, and we don't want him.
So basically, Corporate Right Wing Republicans pick who we get to listen to. And they pick what those "celebrities" get to talk about on the air.
And every "liberal" political show always seems to have on a guest like Rove, Delay, Newt or Pat Buchanan on, so the Republicans always get their say, even on liberal shows.
The rightists don't get to define what the left is..the left does
Likewise the lefties don't get to tell Righties what they believe.
About half the ascii wasted here is some right winger tell us what the left stands for and geting it wrong.
The other half is lefties telling righties what they beleive and ALSO getting it wrong.
If some of you would stop presuming what others actually think these discussion, and actually start READING what others are truly saying, this board would be far less contentious and far more productive, in my opinion.
But the urge to turn people into caracatures, the desire for the intellectually challenged to argue with straw men of their own devices, is just too much a part of the human nature of nitwits for that to ever happen.
Vague, ponderous, and essentially silly.
So you can list 100 people named Tom Brokaw or Katie Couric. Where were they on WMD's? They said nothing? Then they are not liberal.
They are mainstream/corporate media.
Now we are finding out she was right, because we finally have US attorneys who are not doing the White House's bidding.
The rightists don't get to define what the left is..the left does
Likewise the lefties don't get to tell Righties what they believe.
About half the ascii wasted here is some right winger tell us what the left stands for and geting it wrong.
The other half is lefties telling righties what they beleive and ALSO getting it wrong.
If some of you would stop presuming what others actually think these discussion, and actually start READING what others are truly saying, this board would be far less contentious and far more productive, in my opinion.
But the urge to turn people into caracatures, the desire for the intellectually challenged to argue with straw men of their own devices, is just too much a part of the human nature of nitwits for that to ever happen.
Vague, ponderous, and essentially silly.
Yes, fundamental truisms often appear that way to the stunningly uniformed.
The rightists don't get to define what the left is..the left does
Likewise the lefties don't get to tell Righties what they believe.
About half the ascii wasted here is some right winger tell us what the left stands for and geting it wrong.
The other half is lefties telling righties what they beleive and ALSO getting it wrong.
If some of you would stop presuming what others actually think these discussion, and actually start READING what others are truly saying, this board would be far less contentious and far more productive, in my opinion.
But the urge to turn people into caracatures, the desire for the intellectually challenged to argue with straw men of their own devices, is just too much a part of the human nature of nitwits for that to ever happen.
Vague, ponderous, and essentially silly.
Yes, fundamental truisms often appear that way to the stunningly uniformed.
Interesting read on the current Republican party dilemna. Best read from the beginning, not just the quote below.
Talk radio is the only medium that conservatives dominate in America. Is it really shrewd for conservatives to begin their political exile by attacking the leading figure in that world? To ask is to answer.
Limbaugh and his conservative critics have more in common than they think. The political import of the last two weeks of Limbaugh-mania is this: The Republicans' decline is now entering a phase in which its members are more emotionally invested in attacking each other than in attacking Obama. As long as that holds true, the White House can safely ignore the opposition, no matter how loud it gets.
Why Rush Limbaugh Is Good for the Republicans
The rightists don't get to define what the left is..the left does
Likewise the lefties don't get to tell Righties what they believe.
About half the ascii wasted here is some right winger tell us what the left stands for and geting it wrong.
The other half is lefties telling righties what they beleive and ALSO getting it wrong.
If some of you would stop presuming what others actually think these discussion, and actually start READING what others are truly saying, this board would be far less contentious and far more productive, in my opinion.
But the urge to turn people into caracatures, the desire for the intellectually challenged to argue with straw men of their own devices, is just too much a part of the human nature of nitwits for that to ever happen.
To what specific 'truisms' and to what specific 'stunningly uninformed are you referring?The rightists don't get to define what the left is..the left does
Likewise the lefties don't get to tell Righties what they believe.
About half the ascii wasted here is some right winger tell us what the left stands for and geting it wrong.
The other half is lefties telling righties what they beleive and ALSO getting it wrong.
If some of you would stop presuming what others actually think these discussion, and actually start READING what others are truly saying, this board would be far less contentious and far more productive, in my opinion.
But the urge to turn people into caracatures, the desire for the intellectually challenged to argue with straw men of their own devices, is just too much a part of the human nature of nitwits for that to ever happen.
Vague, ponderous, and essentially silly.
Yes, fundamental truisms often appear that way to the stunningly uniformed.
No thinking, rational person could listen to Rush Limpdick and come away without knowing he's nothing but a radio-clown, a showman, comic,....you can't take him seriously?
No thinking, rational person could listen to John Stewart and come away without knowing he's nothing but a Comedy Channel-clown, a showman, comic,....you can't take him seriously!
Yes, that is a petetrating analysis of the Rush v RNC flap, I agree.
However, I do NOT think that the liberals will EVER come up with the equivalent to Rush.
About as close to Rush as the Liberals can get is NPR, and the liberal dish they serve up is wildly different than the pap that Rush's listeners seem to think so delicious.
Air America is failing because liberals do NOT think in the same way (forget content, I mean HOW they think, not WHAT they think) as most conservatives.
