Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #121
Marriage is a natural right and purely private Act that is Only commuted public for full faith and credit purposes in our Union.
Then in walked the rights of children to marriage....
And that changed the whole ball game. It's like you're discussing a contract with five parties and only hearing arguments from two of them; while the other three have the most vested interest in the contract of all five.
Children thrive best with a role model of their same gender in the home. There is no arguing this and further, the Prince's Trust study proves this. In this next Hearing, the Supreme Court will be forced to look at the welfare not just of some kids caught up in a lacking situation by the adults or adult in their lives, but also the 100s of millions of kids yet to be born in this lab experiment.
Since "parenting" kids with no role model of their gender present half the time is highly experimental (and statistically doomed to failure of the children's best interest and esteem), an absolute rock-bottom MUST is allowing the discreet communities this radical change will affect into time unforeseeable, the RIGHT to vote on whether or not this base structural change to marriage should or should not be allowed.
Anything less is a macabre tyranny, a forced perversion into the heart of American society without its expressed consent. And that violates the core structure of our country, on top of marriage.. Violating the core of things seems to be an ongoing theme with the aggressive group lobbying for these collosal changes without the permission of the governed for them.
Like I said...How many of them actually got married? Freedom of association is also a natural right.
You think you're being clever, but what you've actually done is underscored my points about kids and marriage.
Your arrogant point of view is apparent. It is "fuck kids, they aren't old enough to challenge this legally". My reply to that is, thanks for your honesty about your regards to a suffering demographic who is impotent to affect conditions for their best shot at life equal to others. Noted for the record.
Unfortunately for you and your ilk, there is someone old enough to advocate for these voiceless parties to the contract. That is the US Supreme Court. I hope they read this post.
Challenge what legally? In any Case, emancipation is available for those cognizant of their responsibilities as adults. You may be resorting to a fallacy of composition by confusing two separate issues.
THE FORMATIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR CHILDREN CANNOT BE UNDONE WHEN THEY REACH THE AGE OF EMANCIPATION. THE DAMAGE IS ALREADY DONE. Nice try Stalin.. The formative age of children where their entire self-view is cooked and incubated is between the ages of 0 and 6. Are you suggesting that 3 year olds file for legal emancipation??
Well...come to think of it, maybe this kid when he was 3 should've filed for emancipation.. Boy Drugged By Lesbian Parents To Be A Girl US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Challenge the base structural environment that LGBTers are proposing to use them as guinea pigs in. You know what. You know exactly what the custodians of this voteless demographic can and must challenge.
Last edited: