Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
The fact that the Windsor ruling makes no references of state marriage laws being supreme over the federal judiciary or constitutional guarantees is immediately relevant.
Especially since every challenge to gay marriage bans that the USSC is going to hear this April are on the basis of the violation of these constitutional guarantees.
Yet you ignore it all, pretending that no such constitution guarantees exist. Why? Its not like the courts will ignore them just because you close your eyes.
Especially since every challenge to gay marriage bans that the USSC is going to hear this April are on the basis of the violation of these constitutional guarantees.
Yet you ignore it all, pretending that no such constitution guarantees exist. Why? Its not like the courts will ignore them just because you close your eyes.