Lieutenant Colonel Who Worked With Schiff Witness...

[BULLDOG]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

When an officer privie to classified private call dealing DIRECTLY with the CONSTITUTIONAL GRANTED POWER of the US President takes his disagreement to the public.

He took his remarks about that call directly to the committee that subpoenaed him. When did he take that information directly to the public?

Subpoenaed him...........lol...........and illegal subpoena until a vote is taken for an official investigation....

And there are 2 EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOV'T HERE........Congress has oversight of the Executive but can't violate Executive priviledge...........The executive dept. could have told Congress to pound sand......Not released the phone conversation.............as phone calls between leaders of Countries are a matter of the Executive office...............

Trump released it because there was nothing there...............He didn't have to...........and could have ordered that No one goes to congress until they have an official vote............Now that it is done......that is ok........but once there........witnesses can say Executive Priveledge must be addressed first. They can be tried for testifying what is considered Classified information of conversations between 2 leaders.

The Executive can release it and have done so..........even with nothing there the Mickey Mouse show continues........as for years the Dems have vowed to Impeach Trump.......and this is a HAIL MARY PASS...........\

The crimes of the Dems will be coming soon..........as KARMA catches up with the Liars in the Dem party. Indictments will come in the future for those who abused power............Will THEY SING and turn in the big boys are become the Sacrificial lambs of the Dems instead.........that is yet to be seen.

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

 

[eagle1462010]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

When an officer privie to classified private call dealing DIRECTLY with the CONSTITUTIONAL GRANTED POWER of the US President takes his disagreement to the public.

What they fail to understand or even care about is that he could be tried under the UCMJ for doing this.

The military isn't a Democracy...........and he violated the UCMJ by doing what he has just done.

Don't be silly. He testified before a committee.

A committee that had no real subpeona power at the time.............and again......conversations of leaders are covered under the Executive and NOT THE LEGISLATIVE.............

Trump could tie this shit up in court by giving an executive order to not release leader conversations without permission..........and send this all the way to the Supreme Court if he wanted.............

Wouldn't that be a hoot......with your side crying the whole dang way. But Congress doesn't have the power to overcome executive priviledge if challenged..........OBSTRUCTION.......OBSTRUCTION.....the left would cry again to the point of needing a barf bag.

 

[eagle1462010]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

When an officer privie to classified private call dealing DIRECTLY with the CONSTITUTIONAL GRANTED POWER of the US President takes his disagreement to the public.

He took his remarks about that call directly to the committee that subpoenaed him. When did he take that information directly to the public?

Subpoenaed him...........lol...........and illegal subpoena until a vote is taken for an official investigation....

And there are 2 EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOV'T HERE........Congress has oversight of the Executive but can't violate Executive priviledge...........The executive dept. could have told Congress to pound sand......Not released the phone conversation.............as phone calls between leaders of Countries are a matter of the Executive office...............

Trump released it because there was nothing there...............He didn't have to...........and could have ordered that No one goes to congress until they have an official vote............Now that it is done......that is ok........but once there........witnesses can say Executive Priveledge must be addressed first. They can be tried for testifying what is considered Classified information of conversations between 2 leaders.

The Executive can release it and have done so..........even with nothing there the Mickey Mouse show continues........as for years the Dems have vowed to Impeach Trump.......and this is a HAIL MARY PASS...........\

The crimes of the Dems will be coming soon..........as KARMA catches up with the Liars in the Dem party. Indictments will come in the future for those who abused power............Will THEY SING and turn in the big boys are become the Sacrificial lambs of the Dems instead.........that is yet to be seen.

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

Not at all............Congress and Executive are Equal Branches of gov't..........with powers to each side...one side can't without authority order the other to violate their powers.........In regards to conversations with foreign leaders..............they can red tape the living hell out of this..............And Congress would be forced to go the 3rd branch of the Gov't to decide the rules of engagement........

LOL.........that would be a hoot......because you don't own the Supremes now do you.

 

[BULLDOG]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

When an officer privie to classified private call dealing DIRECTLY with the CONSTITUTIONAL GRANTED POWER of the US President takes his disagreement to the public.

He took his remarks about that call directly to the committee that subpoenaed him. When did he take that information directly to the public?

Subpoenaed him...........lol...........and illegal subpoena until a vote is taken for an official investigation....

And there are 2 EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOV'T HERE........Congress has oversight of the Executive but can't violate Executive priviledge...........The executive dept. could have told Congress to pound sand......Not released the phone conversation.............as phone calls between leaders of Countries are a matter of the Executive office...............

Trump released it because there was nothing there...............He didn't have to...........and could have ordered that No one goes to congress until they have an official vote............Now that it is done......that is ok........but once there........witnesses can say Executive Priveledge must be addressed first. They can be tried for testifying what is considered Classified information of conversations between 2 leaders.

The Executive can release it and have done so..........even with nothing there the Mickey Mouse show continues........as for years the Dems have vowed to Impeach Trump.......and this is a HAIL MARY PASS...........\

The crimes of the Dems will be coming soon..........as KARMA catches up with the Liars in the Dem party. Indictments will come in the future for those who abused power............Will THEY SING and turn in the big boys are become the Sacrificial lambs of the Dems instead.........that is yet to be seen.

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

Not at all............Congress and Executive are Equal Branches of gov't..........with powers to each side...one side can't without authority order the other to violate their powers.........In regards to conversations with foreign leaders..............they can red tape the living hell out of this..............And Congress would be forced to go the 3rd branch of the Gov't to decide the rules of engagement........

LOL.........that would be a hoot......because you don't own the Supremes now do you.

What Trump released wasn't a transcript anyway. It said so right on the document. People can certainly testify to what they heard with their own ears, can't they?

 

[theHawk]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

It’s illegal when you are an officer in the military. You don’t sit there and undermine your President just because you don’t like him.
He’s obviously a mentally deranged leftwing hack, and shouldn’t have any security clearance.

 

[BULLDOG]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

It’s illegal when you are an officer in the military. You don’t sit there and undermine your President just because you don’t like him.
He’s obviously a mentally deranged leftwing hack, and shouldn’t have any security clearance.

You think it's illegal for him to say anything that Trump might not like in his testimony before that committee?

 

[eagle1462010]

When an officer privie to classified private call dealing DIRECTLY with the CONSTITUTIONAL GRANTED POWER of the US President takes his disagreement to the public.

He took his remarks about that call directly to the committee that subpoenaed him. When did he take that information directly to the public?

Subpoenaed him...........lol...........and illegal subpoena until a vote is taken for an official investigation....

And there are 2 EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOV'T HERE........Congress has oversight of the Executive but can't violate Executive priviledge...........The executive dept. could have told Congress to pound sand......Not released the phone conversation.............as phone calls between leaders of Countries are a matter of the Executive office...............

Trump released it because there was nothing there...............He didn't have to...........and could have ordered that No one goes to congress until they have an official vote............Now that it is done......that is ok........but once there........witnesses can say Executive Priveledge must be addressed first. They can be tried for testifying what is considered Classified information of conversations between 2 leaders.

The Executive can release it and have done so..........even with nothing there the Mickey Mouse show continues........as for years the Dems have vowed to Impeach Trump.......and this is a HAIL MARY PASS...........\

The crimes of the Dems will be coming soon..........as KARMA catches up with the Liars in the Dem party. Indictments will come in the future for those who abused power............Will THEY SING and turn in the big boys are become the Sacrificial lambs of the Dems instead.........that is yet to be seen.

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

Not at all............Congress and Executive are Equal Branches of gov't..........with powers to each side...one side can't without authority order the other to violate their powers.........In regards to conversations with foreign leaders..............they can red tape the living hell out of this..............And Congress would be forced to go the 3rd branch of the Gov't to decide the rules of engagement........

LOL.........that would be a hoot......because you don't own the Supremes now do you.

What Trump released wasn't a transcript anyway. It said so right on the document. People can certainly testify to what they heard with their own ears, can't they?

The whistle blower didn't hear it with their own ears now did he...................he heard others talking about it........and the rules changed a few months prior to this shit show........imagine that..........this is a set up...........the whistle blower didn't know JACK SQUAT............because he didn't here a dang thing himself.

That alone would get laughed out of a real court room by itself..........And a Mistrial would happen if even a trial......because shifty schifty.........got caught lying about his involvement..........hell in the real world that leftist wack job could and should be disbarred for this.

 

[theHawk]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

It’s illegal when you are an officer in the military. You don’t sit there and undermine your President just because you don’t like him.
He’s obviously a mentally deranged leftwing hack, and shouldn’t have any security clearance.

You think it's illegal for him to say anything that Trump might not like in his testimony before that committee?

Hey dumb-dumb, we’re not talking about his testimony. This is about his actions during his time long before all this nonsense.

Now, go back into your corner.

 

[BULLDOG]

He took his remarks about that call directly to the committee that subpoenaed him. When did he take that information directly to the public?

Subpoenaed him...........lol...........and illegal subpoena until a vote is taken for an official investigation....

And there are 2 EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOV'T HERE........Congress has oversight of the Executive but can't violate Executive priviledge...........The executive dept. could have told Congress to pound sand......Not released the phone conversation.............as phone calls between leaders of Countries are a matter of the Executive office...............

Trump released it because there was nothing there...............He didn't have to...........and could have ordered that No one goes to congress until they have an official vote............Now that it is done......that is ok........but once there........witnesses can say Executive Priveledge must be addressed first. They can be tried for testifying what is considered Classified information of conversations between 2 leaders.

The Executive can release it and have done so..........even with nothing there the Mickey Mouse show continues........as for years the Dems have vowed to Impeach Trump.......and this is a HAIL MARY PASS...........\

The crimes of the Dems will be coming soon..........as KARMA catches up with the Liars in the Dem party. Indictments will come in the future for those who abused power............Will THEY SING and turn in the big boys are become the Sacrificial lambs of the Dems instead.........that is yet to be seen.

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

Not at all............Congress and Executive are Equal Branches of gov't..........with powers to each side...one side can't without authority order the other to violate their powers.........In regards to conversations with foreign leaders..............they can red tape the living hell out of this..............And Congress would be forced to go the 3rd branch of the Gov't to decide the rules of engagement........

LOL.........that would be a hoot......because you don't own the Supremes now do you.

What Trump released wasn't a transcript anyway. It said so right on the document. People can certainly testify to what they heard with their own ears, can't they?

The whistle blower didn't hear it with their own ears now did he...................he heard others talking about it........and the rules changed a few months prior to this shit show........imagine that..........this is a set up...........the whistle blower didn't know JACK SQUAT............because he didn't here a dang thing himself.

That alone would get laughed out of a real court room by itself..........And a Mistrial would happen if even a trial......because shifty schifty.........got caught lying about his involvement..........hell in the real world that leftist wack job could and should be disbarred for this.

The whistle blower told the IG who decided it was worth pursuing. You mad at the IG now too?

 

[BULLDOG]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

It’s illegal when you are an officer in the military. You don’t sit there and undermine your President just because you don’t like him.
He’s obviously a mentally deranged leftwing hack, and shouldn’t have any security clearance.

You think it's illegal for him to say anything that Trump might not like in his testimony before that committee?

Hey dumb-dumb, we’re not talking about his testimony. This is about his actions during his time long before all this nonsense.

Now, go back into your corner.

So you think his respect for the then president makes his testimony now false? Really?

 

[eagle1462010]

Subpoenaed him...........lol...........and illegal subpoena until a vote is taken for an official investigation....

And there are 2 EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOV'T HERE........Congress has oversight of the Executive but can't violate Executive priviledge...........The executive dept. could have told Congress to pound sand......Not released the phone conversation.............as phone calls between leaders of Countries are a matter of the Executive office...............

Trump released it because there was nothing there...............He didn't have to...........and could have ordered that No one goes to congress until they have an official vote............Now that it is done......that is ok........but once there........witnesses can say Executive Priveledge must be addressed first. They can be tried for testifying what is considered Classified information of conversations between 2 leaders.

The Executive can release it and have done so..........even with nothing there the Mickey Mouse show continues........as for years the Dems have vowed to Impeach Trump.......and this is a HAIL MARY PASS...........\

The crimes of the Dems will be coming soon..........as KARMA catches up with the Liars in the Dem party. Indictments will come in the future for those who abused power............Will THEY SING and turn in the big boys are become the Sacrificial lambs of the Dems instead.........that is yet to be seen.

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

Not at all............Congress and Executive are Equal Branches of gov't..........with powers to each side...one side can't without authority order the other to violate their powers.........In regards to conversations with foreign leaders..............they can red tape the living hell out of this..............And Congress would be forced to go the 3rd branch of the Gov't to decide the rules of engagement........

LOL.........that would be a hoot......because you don't own the Supremes now do you.

What Trump released wasn't a transcript anyway. It said so right on the document. People can certainly testify to what they heard with their own ears, can't they?

The whistle blower didn't hear it with their own ears now did he...................he heard others talking about it........and the rules changed a few months prior to this shit show........imagine that..........this is a set up...........the whistle blower didn't know JACK SQUAT............because he didn't here a dang thing himself.

That alone would get laughed out of a real court room by itself..........And a Mistrial would happen if even a trial......because shifty schifty.........got caught lying about his involvement..........hell in the real world that leftist wack job could and should be disbarred for this.

The whistle blower told the IG who decided it was worth pursuing. You mad at the IG now too?

The IG who slung it towards someone as fast as he could you mean........like a HOT POTATO.........

One thing you fail to understand............the IG must look at it as a matter of policy.......doesn't make it true or not.

Again........Hearsay evidence isn't evidence in a real court room...........

Again........this isn't a real courtroom.....but the Mickey Mouse Club Congress that have made us the laughing stock of the world.............

Enjoy the show.........that is all it is.

 

[BULLDOG]

You are thoroughly confused, aren't you?

Not at all............Congress and Executive are Equal Branches of gov't..........with powers to each side...one side can't without authority order the other to violate their powers.........In regards to conversations with foreign leaders..............they can red tape the living hell out of this..............And Congress would be forced to go the 3rd branch of the Gov't to decide the rules of engagement........

LOL.........that would be a hoot......because you don't own the Supremes now do you.

What Trump released wasn't a transcript anyway. It said so right on the document. People can certainly testify to what they heard with their own ears, can't they?

The whistle blower didn't hear it with their own ears now did he...................he heard others talking about it........and the rules changed a few months prior to this shit show........imagine that..........this is a set up...........the whistle blower didn't know JACK SQUAT............because he didn't here a dang thing himself.

That alone would get laughed out of a real court room by itself..........And a Mistrial would happen if even a trial......because shifty schifty.........got caught lying about his involvement..........hell in the real world that leftist wack job could and should be disbarred for this.

The whistle blower told the IG who decided it was worth pursuing. You mad at the IG now too?

The IG who slung it towards someone as fast as he could you mean........like a HOT POTATO.........

One thing you fail to understand............the IG must look at it as a matter of policy.......doesn't make it true or not.

Again........Hearsay evidence isn't evidence in a real court room...........

Again........this isn't a real courtroom.....but the Mickey Mouse Club Congress that have made us the laughing stock of the world.............

Enjoy the show.........that is all it is.

You're just mumbling now.

 

[theHawk]

When did it become illegal to have political beliefs, or to discuss them? If you can show he lied in his testimony, you might have something, but liking Obama wasn't and still isn't a crime.

It’s illegal when you are an officer in the military. You don’t sit there and undermine your President just because you don’t like him.
He’s obviously a mentally deranged leftwing hack, and shouldn’t have any security clearance.

You think it's illegal for him to say anything that Trump might not like in his testimony before that committee?

Hey dumb-dumb, we’re not talking about his testimony. This is about his actions during his time long before all this nonsense.

Now, go back into your corner.

So you think his respect for the then president makes his testimony now false? Really?

Jesus Christ, the level of your stupidity is unreal. The OP isn’t about his testimony. But I understand, you need to change topics because you look like a dunce.

As for his testimony, I do believe he was honest, as he stated that his concern was for the Ukraine, and it’s “bi-partisan” support. It proves his motivations were political and out of concern for the foreign country, not his President’s policy.

Do YOU think he was lying when he testified to that?