ChrisL
Diamond Member
He admitted he liked to "fuck young girls." He evaded his sentencing and fled the country. He was locked up for a psychiatric evaluation which was NOT a part of his sentencing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He admitted to having sex with a 13 year old ...
He hadn't been sentenced yet. There is no such thing as a sentence and a do-over sentence.That's where you're wrong. Polanski never served any sentence at all.
Yes, he did. He spent 42 days of a 90 day sentence in a state prison hospital...after which the doctors there decided he wasn't a threat and wasn't likely to do it again.
That's where you're wrong. Polanski never served any sentence at all.
Yes, he did. He spent 42 days of a 90 day sentence in a state prison hospital...after which the doctors there decided he wasn't a threat and wasn't likely to do it again.
Yes, I'm sure this girl (woman now) is pretty embarrassed and ashamed, and doesn't really want to rehash all of this, which is totally normal for someone who has experienced a rape. They self blame, and that is totally normal. That is not the POINT at all. The point is that this guy is obviously not under control of himself enough to NOT drug and rape young girls. Young girls need to be protected from such predatory individuals who would rather prey on naive teenagers than women their own age group.
Under the terms of the plea agreement, the court ordered Polanski to report to a state prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation, but granted a stay to allow him to complete his current project. Under the terms set by the court, he traveled to Europe to complete filming.[29] Polanski returned to California and reported to Chino State Prison for the evaluation period, and was released after 42 days.[30] Polanski's lawyers had the expectation that Polanski would get only probation at the subsequent sentencing hearing, with the probation officer, examining psychiatrist, and the victim all recommending against jail time
However, it is alleged in the documentary Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, that things changed after an ex parte conversation between LA Deputy District Attorney David Wells and the judge, Laurence J. Rittenband. Wells was not an attorney of record on the case, but was an attorney for the State of California, which was a party to the case. Thus, the communication with Wells was a one-sided external communication, which is prohibited by ethics law. Wells allegedly showed the judge a photo of Polanski with his arms around some ostensibly underage girls, and convinced Rittenband that Polanski should not be released.
And they were wrong. Most sexual predators can not be treated.
He hadn't been sentenced yet. There is no such thing as a sentence and a do-over sentence.
He can appear for his sentencing hearing. The woman can make a victim impact statement in his support if she wishes. Then he can serve whatever the judge says.
He hadn't been sentenced yet. There is no such thing as a sentence and a do-over sentence.
He can appear for his sentencing hearing. The woman can make a victim impact statement in his support if she wishes. Then he can serve whatever the judge says.
Or he can tell California to go fuck itself, which he should.
And they were wrong. Most sexual predators can not be treated.
except it's been 40 years, and there haven't been any really credible claims he is still engaging in the behavior.
He admitted he liked to "fuck young girls." He evaded his sentencing and fled the country. He was locked up for a psychiatric evaluation which was NOT a part of his sentencing.
He's a sick bastard who could pose a threat to other young girls if the opportunity presents itself. THAT is the point of locking these guys up, not one particular victim's embarrassment about the situation and wishful thinking that it would just go away.
Basically, Joe is accusing the 13-year-old CHILD of being some kind of an accomplice in a scheme where her mother puts her up for sex with old men, but the old men are totally INNOCENT victims of this scheme.
Well he's been living in France for quite some time. The age of consent is only 16. So who knows what, or who he is doing.
Basically, Joe is accusing the 13-year-old CHILD of being some kind of an accomplice in a scheme where her mother puts her up for sex with old men, but the old men are totally INNOCENT victims of this scheme.
Oh, no, the men were dumb for falling for it. But 13 years old is old enough to know right from wrong.
At least when it's a black kid being shot by a cop for playing with a toy gun.
Well he's been living in France for quite some time. The age of consent is only 16. So who knows what, or who he is doing.
Because clearly, they have no policemen or prosecutors in France.
He admitted he liked to "fuck young girls." He evaded his sentencing and fled the country. He was locked up for a psychiatric evaluation which was NOT a part of his sentencing.
And even those folks didn't think he needed the full 90 days.
He's a sick bastard who could pose a threat to other young girls if the opportunity presents itself. THAT is the point of locking these guys up, not one particular victim's embarrassment about the situation and wishful thinking that it would just go away.
The guy is 84 years old! Get fucking real.
this is about punishing a celebrity you don't like because you don't like his politics.
You are totally sick in the head. Seek help from a professional.
This is about locking up a child predator. Yes, there are elderly men who are child predators too, you tard.
You are totally sick in the head. Seek help from a professional.
Come on, you can't have it both ways. Either 13 year olds are capable of making adult decisions and getting adult consequences or they are not.