Liberty's endless thread of idiotic liberal callers to the Wilkow Majority radio show

[Liberty]

Please enjoy, will post new clips regularly.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNJ7Cvq38n0]YouTube - Wilkow Majority 05/10/2011 Chad from New Jersey[/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amyh9rPjTjE]YouTube - Wilkow Majority 05/09/2011 Greg from Nashville Tennessee[/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJNwUXc0SfA]YouTube - Wilkow Majority 05/03/2011 Tray from Mississippi[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHuCIur5uqk]YouTube - Wilkow Majority 05/03/2011 Chris from Ohio[/ame]

 

[Oddball]

Ahhh...The stale old "general welfare" rubric.

If incomprehensibly vague "general welfare" argument held any water, why would you enumerate the following powers or even have a concept of enumerated powers?

Friggin' knuckleheads.

 

[whitehall]

If you really wanted to fix the Country you would be a tea party activist. If you want to whine about the Country without actually doing anything you could call yourself a libertarian.

 

[Liberty]

If you really wanted to fix the Country you would be a tea party activist. If you want to whine about the Country without actually doing anything you could call yourself a libertarian.

Well, libertarian is a way of thinking, not a partisan zombie way of living. Which part of the libertarian platform do you have issue with?

 

[Cuyo]

Ahhh...The stale old "general welfare" rubric.

If incomprehensibly vague "general welfare" argument held any water, why would you enumerate the following powers or even have a concept of enumerated powers?

Friggin' knuckleheads.

Strange how ambiguous the document is, ain't it? One might almost say... Intentionally ambiguous?

 

[Cal]

Not even gonna bother listening to these "calls". Wonder if Wilkow buys his "callers" from the same company Rush does?

 

[whitehall]

If you really wanted to fix the Country you would be a tea party activist. If you want to whine about the Country without actually doing anything you could call yourself a libertarian.

Well, libertarian is a way of thinking, not a partisan zombie way of living. Which part of the libertarian platform do you have issue with?

Let me get this straight, libertarians think political partisans who take a stand about their political ideology are what? Zombies? Typical opinion of do nothing phonies.

 

[QUENTIN]

You have it backwards hoss.

Political partisans are, by definition, not taking a stand about their political ideology as a partisan is committed to a political party rather than an ideology. A partisan will, again by definition, follow and support their chosen party even when they stray from their supposed ideology (hence the mindless zombie comparison). That's what being partisan means, committing yourself not to ideas and principles but to a particular political organization.

Libertarians, by definition, are taking a stand about their ideology as libertarianism is not a party but an ideology and that's what they're committed to. Being a libertarian means supporting ideas and principles not a particular political organization.

I'm not a libertarian, the same principle applies to any ideology vs. party.

Liberals, conservatives, libertarians, progressives, paleoconservatives, socialists, communists, and the like are all ideologues committed to a way of thinking and taking a stand for their ideology.

Democrats, Republicans, Libertarian Party followers, Progressive Party followers, Constitution Party followers, Socialist Party followers , Communist Party followers and the like are all partisans committed to a party before an ideology.

Obviously the party one supports is based largely on ideological harmony, but the difference between an ideologue and a partisan is whether they ultimately support the ideas or the group more. That's just what the words mean.

 

[rightwinger]

Ahhh...The stale old "general welfare" rubric.

If incomprehensibly vague "general welfare" argument held any water, why would you enumerate the following powers or even have a concept of enumerated powers?

Friggin' knuckleheads.

Why wouldn't you?

The Constitution is intentionally vague General Welfare means do what's best for the country

Nothing wrong with that

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you really wanted to fix the Country you would be a tea party activist. If you want to whine about the Country without actually doing anything you could call yourself a libertarian.

Well, libertarian is a way of thinking, not a partisan zombie way of living. Which part of the libertarian platform do you have issue with?

The part that gets them about 5% of the vote in most elections. Oh wait, that would be the whole platform.

The libertarians have their moments, philosophically, but if you're a movement with no meaningful political influence in the big picture, what's the point?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Andrew Wilkow is a B list Hannity wannabee who got his break in radio by marrying the boss's daughter at WABC.

 

[Liberty]

If you really wanted to fix the Country you would be a tea party activist. If you want to whine about the Country without actually doing anything you could call yourself a libertarian.

Well, libertarian is a way of thinking, not a partisan zombie way of living. Which part of the libertarian platform do you have issue with?

Let me get this straight, libertarians think political partisans who take a stand about their political ideology are what? Zombies? Typical opinion of do nothing phonies.

bolded and enlarged for your poor eyesight.

 

[Liberty]

If you really wanted to fix the Country you would be a tea party activist. If you want to whine about the Country without actually doing anything you could call yourself a libertarian.

Well, libertarian is a way of thinking, not a partisan zombie way of living. Which part of the libertarian platform do you have issue with?

The part that gets them about 5% of the vote in most elections. Oh wait, that would be the whole platform.

The libertarians have their moments, philosophically, but if you're a movement with no meaningful political influence in the big picture, what's the point?

what you morons have to realize is that people are not libertarians to win votes. libertarians dont care about being minority because we stand by and support our principles and that is what matters to us.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Ahhh...The stale old "general welfare" rubric.

If incomprehensibly vague "general welfare" argument held any water, why would you enumerate the following powers or even have a concept of enumerated powers?

Friggin' knuckleheads.

My problem is when others "general welfare" infringes on my "pursuit of happiness".

 

[DiamondDave]

Ahhh...The stale old "general welfare" rubric.

If incomprehensibly vague "general welfare" argument held any water, why would you enumerate the following powers or even have a concept of enumerated powers?

Friggin' knuckleheads.

Why wouldn't you?

The Constitution is intentionally vague General Welfare means do what's best for the country

Nothing wrong with that

Unless you take the full context... wingers such as yourself love to leave all the parts after the term "general welfare" out

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, libertarian is a way of thinking, not a partisan zombie way of living. Which part of the libertarian platform do you have issue with?

The part that gets them about 5% of the vote in most elections. Oh wait, that would be the whole platform.

The libertarians have their moments, philosophically, but if you're a movement with no meaningful political influence in the big picture, what's the point?

what you morons have to realize is that people are not libertarians to win votes. libertarians dont care about being minority because we stand by and support our principles and that is what matters to us.

I know you're not. For years I've called the Libertarians the Fantasy league of Politics.

You pretend to have a Party, you pretend to have candidates, and you pretend to compete in elections.

And good for you. Fantasy sports are fun; I play them all the time.

 

[Liberty]

The part that gets them about 5% of the vote in most elections. Oh wait, that would be the whole platform.

The libertarians have their moments, philosophically, but if you're a movement with no meaningful political influence in the big picture, what's the point?

what you morons have to realize is that people are not libertarians to win votes. libertarians dont care about being minority because we stand by and support our principles and that is what matters to us.

I know you're not. For years I've called the Libertarians the Fantasy league of Politics.

You pretend to have a Party, you pretend to have candidates, and you pretend to compete in elections.

And good for you. Fantasy sports are fun; I play them all the time.

You are suggesting that it is necessary for a person to forsake their values. I disagree.

 

[Liberty]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPvGssFWMDU]YouTube - ‪Wilkow Majority 05/31/2011 Greg from D.C.‬‏[/ame]