Liberal media caught in another blatant lie: National Mall was FULL during Trump's inauguration

[candycorn]

candycorn ... Just as I always pictured you?


View attachment 108173

​

That was the guy who “cracked the case” on how the media made millions of people disappear from your messiah’s speech….

 

[candycorn]

candycorn ... Just as I always pictured you...


View attachment 108173

​

And how I’ve always pictured you…

 

[midcan5]

More alternative reality from the uneducated American right wing, too funny.

So, how did you like President Trump’s first few days? Pretty awesome, right?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill

 

[Mac1958]

It appears that no one is disputing the photo.

 

[strollingbones]

 

[Missourian]

candycorn Pretty sure I never uploaded that pic...you just uploaded this one. You mean it's not a selfie?

 

[Missourian]

It appears that no one is disputing the photo.

The question is, would the MSM deceptively edit the crowd images? Is this another NBC vs Zimmerman the white Hispanic 911 calls?

NBC issues apology for edited Zimmerman 911 call

 

[frigidweirdo]

Lots of liberals have been stridently insisting that the Mall was half empty or worse during Trump's inauguration. They point to photos displayed by the New York Times and other liberal rags as "proof", showing most of the Mall empty.

But CNN has developed a photo technique they call "Gigapixel", which takes a photo of a very large area, with such precision that you can zoom in and see individual faces. They used it while Trump was giving his inaugural address.

Unfortunately, CNN was so eager to show off their new technology, they forgot to get their stories straight with the other media outlets first. You have to go to the website and pivot the picture back and forth. And when you do, at one end you can see Trump standing at the dais alone, giving his speech to the audience. And if you swing it the other way and zoom out, you can see that the National Mall is COMPLETELY FULL except for two small sections that were 75% full. That's easily a million people.

No wonder Trump's people ripped the media a new one (again). The NYTimes was manufacturing fake news (again) designed to make Trump look bad (again), and they got caught red-handed (again).

A small line near the bottom of the NYT article explains the lie: They admit that their half-empty picture was taken nearly an hour before Trump was inaugurated, and that people were still coming in. Why they call that picture "Trump's Inauguration" is not explained.

When you ask someone how many people came to Trump's inauguration, you're not asking how many showed up an hour early. You're asking how many were there. The NYT tried to substitute the hour-earlier picture for an actual picture of the inauguration. But CNN showed an actual picture of the inauguration, in terrific detail... thus blowing the New York Times' lie out of the water.

For the New York Times' fake picture, see https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-crowd.html?_r=0

And for CNN's true picture taken an hour later, see Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump .

Remember to zoom the CNN picture in and out so you can see Trump giving his speech (which pinpoints what time it was taken), and you can also see that the entire Mall is jammed to the rafters.

The problem here is PERSPECTIVE.

People trying to show something from different angles and pretending the image should look the same, is rather retarded.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-crowd.html?_r=0

This article says "The footage on this page was captured 45 minutes before each oath of office." 45 minutes before the inauguration took place.



This video from MSN shows what was happening. They say the Inauguration is about to start, and then say in the next 10-15 minutes then show the crowds from above, and there are clearly large spaces. They even said "we do see a lot of white space there", at the time there was no debate about this, there was no issue. Why would he say that? They then go and take a shot from Capitol Hill and the area looks full.

Why? Perspective, that's why. What Trump could see was a full Mall. What the cameras from behind and MUCH HIGHER UP could see was lots of empty space.

But the issue here isn't one of how many people came. The issue is of a petty and childish president who made an issue out of something that no one would really care about otherwise.
And also an issue of those who support him who will BELIEVE anything he says, regardless.

Not ONE person who has said Trump is right has shown a photo from behind with all that space filled in. Not one.

 

[Mac1958]

It appears that no one is disputing the photo.

The question is, would the MSM deceptively edit the crowd images?

It's simply impossible to know at this point, that's why I was curious about the reactions here. You'd think the CNN photo is legit and it's certainly possible the MSM would go out of its way to deceive. But you really can't assume that, either. This is uncharted territory.
.

 

[frigidweirdo]

It appears that no one is disputing the photo.

The question is, would the MSM deceptively edit the crowd images? Is this another NBC vs Zimmerman the white Hispanic 911 calls?

NBC issues apology for edited Zimmerman 911 call

The question is, could they edit crowd images live?

The other question is, if you look at other photos, and compare them, do you see the white space that is similar, the answer is yes.

Here's Obama's from 2009

Here's Trump's. You clearly see lots of people in both, but behind you see white space. But there's LESS white space here than in this picture

Why? Because the people are edging one end of each section. So, from one side it looks like more people than on the other side. However do the facts add up? Yes, they do. Where there are less people in one, there are less people in the other, you just look at each section, there isn't much difference.

The issue is people who are trying to make out Trump is right, when he's clearly A) wrong and B) Childish.

 

[Mac1958]

It appears that no one is disputing the photo.

The question is, would the MSM deceptively edit the crowd images? Is this another NBC vs Zimmerman the white Hispanic 911 calls?

NBC issues apology for edited Zimmerman 911 call

The question is, could they edit crowd images live?

The other question is, if you look at other photos, and compare them, do you see the white space that is similar, the answer is yes.

Here's Obama's from 2009

Here's Trump's. You clearly see lots of people in both, but behind you see white space. But there's LESS white space here than in this picture

Why? Because the people are edging one end of each section. So, from one side it looks like more people than on the other side. However do the facts add up? Yes, they do. Where there are less people in one, there are less people in the other, you just look at each section, there isn't much difference.

The issue is people who are trying to make out Trump is right, when he's clearly A) wrong and B) Childish.

Outside of the claims of the photographers, I can't know for sure when those photos were taken.

I'm not saying Trump is right. I'm saying that no honest person can say for sure.

I do know that partisans are going to believe anything that supports their political agendas.
.

 

[frigidweirdo]

PHOTOS: The Inauguration of President Donald Trump | WTTG

Fox news pictures

See white space? No, you don't? Well, remember, from Trump's position he'd see no white space here.

See the black guy? THE black guy. He is wearing a Hillary hat.

Now, a little higher than Trump, see the white spaces? I sure do.
This is going to be a while before the inauguration.

White space anyone?

\
Still white space

Not even Fox, right wing media who actually posted a report called "Mainstream media screams in pain as Trump becomes president (they know he beat them, too)"

Mainstream media screams in pain as Trump becomes president (they know he beat them, too)

So, Fox make out they're not the mainstream media and they're on Trump's side. And they've spoken nothing about this spat over crowd numbers.

 

[Missourian]

Why? Because the people are edging one end of each section. So, from one side it looks like more people than on the other side. However do the facts add up? Yes, they do. Where there are less people in one, there are less people in the other, you just look at each section, there isn't much difference.

The issue is people who are trying to make out Trump is right, when he's clearly A) wrong and B) Childish.

I see what you're saying...but...

If these sections back sections are almost empty..

Then why do these look equally full? (the white in the back is the very back section, which does seem less than full)

 

[frigidweirdo]

It appears that no one is disputing the photo.

The question is, would the MSM deceptively edit the crowd images? Is this another NBC vs Zimmerman the white Hispanic 911 calls?

NBC issues apology for edited Zimmerman 911 call

The question is, could they edit crowd images live?

The other question is, if you look at other photos, and compare them, do you see the white space that is similar, the answer is yes.

Here's Obama's from 2009

Here's Trump's. You clearly see lots of people in both, but behind you see white space. But there's LESS white space here than in this picture

Why? Because the people are edging one end of each section. So, from one side it looks like more people than on the other side. However do the facts add up? Yes, they do. Where there are less people in one, there are less people in the other, you just look at each section, there isn't much difference.

The issue is people who are trying to make out Trump is right, when he's clearly A) wrong and B) Childish.

Outside of the claims of the photographers, I can't know for sure when those photos were taken.

I'm not saying Trump is right. I'm saying that no honest person can say for sure.

I do know that partisans are going to believe anything that supports their political agendas.
.

Thing is, there's a time laps video and it shows the empty spaces AT ALL TIMES. No one has show a single video without these spaces.

An honest person can look at the evidence and ALL the evidence points to no faking.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Why? Because the people are edging one end of each section. So, from one side it looks like more people than on the other side. However do the facts add up? Yes, they do. Where there are less people in one, there are less people in the other, you just look at each section, there isn't much difference.

The issue is people who are trying to make out Trump is right, when he's clearly A) wrong and B) Childish.

I see what you're saying...but...

If these sections back sections are almost empty..

View attachment 108177

Then why do these look equally full? (the white in the back is the very back section, which does seem less than full)

View attachment 108178

Again, perspective. There is NOTHING abnormal with those photos showing the same thing appearing differently.

If you take a picture from in front where all the people are gathered, and you take it from lower down, you'll see less floor space.

The second picture is a lot, LOT lower than the first.

 

[owebo]

More alternative reality from the uneducated American right wing, too funny.

So, how did you like President Trump’s first few days? Pretty awesome, right?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill

We have a similar axiom here in America....

It's not true that all liberals are Nazis, but it is true all liberals are fascist...

 

[The Breeze]

Lots of liberals have been stridently insisting .

The Dictionary Trolls Kellyanne Conway By Tweeting Out The Definition Of Fact

"A fact is a piece of information presented as having objective reality," Merriam-Webster Dictionary tweeted after Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway tried to rebrand the Trump administration's false statements as "alternative facts."…

Okay.

What is your opinion of the photo?
.

He hasn't gotten the morning talking points yet, give the snowflake a little time.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Lots of liberals have been stridently insisting that the Mall was half empty or worse during Trump's inauguration. They point to photos displayed by the New York Times and other liberal rags as "proof", showing most of the Mall empty.

But CNN has developed a photo technique they call "Gigapixel", which takes a photo of a very large area, with such precision that you can zoom in and see individual faces. They used it while Trump was giving his inaugural address.

Unfortunately, CNN was so eager to show off their new technology, they forgot to get their stories straight with the other media outlets first. You have to go to the website and pivot the picture back and forth. And when you do, at one end you can see Trump standing at the dais alone, giving his speech to the audience. And if you swing it the other way and zoom out, you can see that the National Mall is COMPLETELY FULL except for two small sections that were 75% full. That's easily a million people.

No wonder Trump's people ripped the media a new one (again). The NYTimes was manufacturing fake news (again) designed to make Trump look bad (again), and they got caught red-handed (again).

A small line near the bottom of the NYT article explains the lie: They admit that their half-empty picture was taken nearly an hour before Trump was inaugurated, and that people were still coming in. Why they call that picture "Trump's Inauguration" is not explained.

When you ask someone how many people came to Trump's inauguration, you're not asking how many showed up an hour early. You're asking how many were there. The NYT tried to substitute the hour-earlier picture for an actual picture of the inauguration. But CNN showed an actual picture of the inauguration, in terrific detail... thus blowing the New York Times' lie out of the water.

For the New York Times' fake picture, see https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-crowd.html?_r=0

And for CNN's true picture taken an hour later, see Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump .

Remember to zoom the CNN picture in and out so you can see Trump giving his speech (which pinpoints what time it was taken), and you can also see that the entire Mall is jammed to the rafters.

What I find completely hypocritical of the lickspittle, liberal, lapdog, media, is how quickly they point out how a falsehood was told by the Trump Spokesman, yet never ever, questioned the honesty of the Obama Spokesmouth, called Josh, Ernest(Big Ass Liar). All this is doing, is once again, moving more people away from the "NEWS" organization and making Trump more likable. But the liberal media is too investing in their Socialist Propaganda, and cannot ever change. And I hope they never do, for the US will never again vote Liberal, unless the LEFT tries to take over the government by uprising and overthrow it.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

PHOTOS: The Inauguration of President Donald Trump | WTTG

Fox news pictures

See white space? No, you don't? Well, remember, from Trump's position he'd see no white space here.

See the black guy? THE black guy. He is wearing a Hillary hat.

Now, a little higher than Trump, see the white spaces? I sure do.
This is going to be a while before the inauguration.

White space anyone?

\
Still white space

Not even Fox, right wing media who actually posted a report called "Mainstream media screams in pain as Trump becomes president (they know he beat them, too)"

Mainstream media screams in pain as Trump becomes president (they know he beat them, too)

So, Fox make out they're not the mainstream media and they're on Trump's side. And they've spoken nothing about this spat over crowd numbers.

It is a shame that on the Trump Inauguration, there were threats of violence, and there was, which caused many people to stay home, yet on the women's march there was no threats, so more could come out? I am glad that the liberals show their true colors, and it makes future voters hate the liberals even more.

 

[Edgetho]

I was extraordinarily disappointed in FNC yesterday. All day they took the side of the Lames Stream Media. The whole crew...... All of them.

They're too stupid to understand that the picture showing an empty Mall was taken way before the inauguration of Trump and the picture taken of the Lying Cocksucker's innageration was taken during.

They're also too stupid to realize that the INTERNET is much, much more of a source of viewing than it was in 2009 or 2013. By a big margin. A lot. MILLIONS of people watched the inauguration on line and there's really no way of measuring that right now. MILLIONS. TENS OF MILLIONS

CNN had nearly 17 MILLION live streams between 1:00 and 2:00PM by itself.

But the dinosaur media is too fucking stupid to realize that.

They're too stupid to even see the viewing platform that is burying them...... Meanwhile Trump is capitalizing on it.

Bigly.

There's no reasoning with dimocrap scum, people. No point in even trying