LGBTs At It Again: "The Equality Act": Shoehorn to End Religious Or Any Other Objections

This thread is about human sexual orientation. Not animals. So far, only one sexual orientation can marry. Polygamists can file a lawsuit and it would make world news today.

Nope. They already filed suit, petitioning the USSC itself. It barely made a blip.

You're pumping pure, desperate imagination, Jen. And you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

How would they be denied?

'Polyamory' isn't a sexual orientation. As 'poly' isn't a sex. Its a number.

Jen, seriously......you have no idea what you're talking about. You're just making this shit up as you go along. And you've literally *never* been right in any legal prediction.

How do you explain your stunning, nay *perfect* record of failure in predicting the outcome of any case?

Bad luck?

No ones luck is THAT bad.

Its a combination of blind homophobic bigotry and delusions.
 
This thread is about human sexual orientation. Not animals. So far, only one sexual orientation can marry. Polygamists can file a lawsuit and it would make world news today.

Nope. They already filed suit, petitioning the USSC itself. It barely made a blip.

You're pumping pure, desperate imagination, Jen. And you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

How would they be denied?

'Polyamory' isn't a sexual orientation. As 'poly' isn't a sex. Its a number.

Jen, seriously......you have no idea what you're talking about. You're just making this shit up as you go along. And you've literally *never* been right in any legal prediction.

How do you explain your stunning, nay *perfect* record of failure in predicting the outcome of any case?

Bad luck?

No ones luck is THAT bad.

Its a combination of blind homophobic bigotry and delusions.

If she'd guess....literally thrown a dart at a board with outcomes, statistically she'd have gotten at least ONE right by now. Her tendency toward the absurdly pseudo-legal is almost uncanny.
 
She is hurting, and she won't let it go.

I usually try and figure out people's motivations, what they want. When you know what a person wants, what they need, you have the bulk of who they are.

Sil's a tricky bird. Her background wouldn't lead you to think she's be this obsessive about gays. She's rural, used to breed horses, had highly educated parents.

Yet she's created at least 80 anti-gay threads on our board, each with the same long, rambling, manifesto-like rants filled with self supporting pseudo-legal and pseudo-psychological gibberish. She's created entire websites on this topic, she's created her own message board with dozens of threads......where she's the only one posting.

Literally replying to herself.

Its one of the reasons I lean hard on the mental illness hypothesis.
 
She is mentally ill because of her interaction with certain person(s) at one time.
 
Ad hominem...ad hominem...ad hominem...ad hominem. No replies to topic title from the LGBT peanut gallery. ^^
 
Sil, you are mentally ill. Since that is the truth, no ad hom has been committed against you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top