Letter from my employer concerning Obamacare/Obamatax

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Zxereus, Jul 8, 2012.

  1. Zxereus
    Offline

    Zxereus BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    1,244
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +152

    The reason I post this, is because every time I hear a moron liberal who claims you wont be affected at all unless you do not have a plan, I want to throw something at the TV, radio, or computer screen.
    I've been around the block a few times, and you cannot sit there and tell me I wont be affected no matter what. This is a whole new entitlement program that will have it's own burecracy of the federal government. Ever know one of those that do anything but grow ?

    Wont affect me or you my ass ! Just wait a few years dumbasses !
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2012
  2. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,368
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,370
    It will just like all other nationalized health care countries.... you pay for national shit plan...and pay for the premium plan you want that will provide you with the care and standards you are used to having.

     
  3. theDoctorisIn
    Online

    theDoctorisIn Senior Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    18,203
    Thanks Received:
    2,566
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    between the bay and the breakers
    Ratings:
    +2,845
    Actually, that letter says that you're not affected by the law, as far as they know right now.
     
  4. tjvh
    Offline

    tjvh Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    6,893
    Thanks Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +915
    And in time prices for everything else will rise, just as they did in Canada... Because the money has to come from somewhere. The working class won't be able to foot the entire Bill.
     
  5. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,368
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,370

    Oh i know.... pricing is going to go off the scale becasue of his little ponzi scheme
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Black_Label
    Offline

    Black_Label Registered Democrat

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,306
    Thanks Received:
    507
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +507
    The hard right trash doesn't care, in their minds: The ACA = complete doom and destruction to america. We will be forced to live on the streets in cardboard boxes, dig through landfills for scraps, and drink from swamps to survive..
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2012
  7. Zxereus
    Offline

    Zxereus BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    1,244
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +152

    "as far as they know right now"


    Yeah, and that's the whole point.
     
  8. theDoctorisIn
    Online

    theDoctorisIn Senior Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    18,203
    Thanks Received:
    2,566
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    between the bay and the breakers
    Ratings:
    +2,845
    So, you're outraged that there's a possibility that in 6 years, your plan might be deemed a "Cadillac" plan, and you might have to pay an additional tax?

    Why don't you wait until you're actually affected by it before you get outraged, rather than get outraged about how you might at some point in the future be affected by it.
     
  9. LoneLaugher
    Offline

    LoneLaugher Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    22,086
    Thanks Received:
    2,366
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    Inside Mac's Head
    Ratings:
    +2,739
    Doc,

    It's the UNCERTAINTY.

    As you know, unless a business owner can be absolutely certain about what costs will be 6 years from now, he or she cannot possibly make a 5 year plan. They will be paralyzed by this uncertainty and will refrain from investing in their business and hiring employees....even if they need them to meet demand.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. idb
    Offline

    idb VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,591
    Thanks Received:
    602
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Arrowtown, New Zealand
    Ratings:
    +652
    Unless he doesn't want health insurance...
     
  11. LoneLaugher
    Offline

    LoneLaugher Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    22,086
    Thanks Received:
    2,366
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    Inside Mac's Head
    Ratings:
    +2,739
    There are no sane, thinking people who do not want health insurance. There are only people who do not believe in the idea that we are one nation....and ought to pool our resources to improve the health of this nation.........as a whole.

    People who claim that they pay out of pocket for their medical expenses are either full of shit or have never been seriously ill or injured. Anyone with an income large enough to pay out of pocket is smart enough to understand the value of buying insurance.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  12. NYcarbineer
    Online

    NYcarbineer Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    46,855
    Thanks Received:
    4,138
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +4,604
    The Right says this about every bit of change and progress that happens. One example..remember how allowing gays in the military was going to destroy that institution? How many times did we hear hysterica to that effect?

    Imagine if the country had actually listened to the Right over the decades of the history of this country. Think of all the changes that would not have happened.
     
  13. NYcarbineer
    Online

    NYcarbineer Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    46,855
    Thanks Received:
    4,138
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +4,604
    The 'uncertainty' argument is nothing more than propaganda. When was there EVER 'certainty'?

    Never.
     
  14. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    23,117
    Thanks Received:
    4,017
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +4,196
    Let's HOPE the plan does affect you with all of the improvements, carry your kids on your plan till they are 25, cover preexisting conditions, not have a cap on what the insurance companies will pay in a lifetime for your care....and hopefully lower your insurance expense etc etc etc. :eusa_whistle: ;)

    How much did Medicare Part D's (the pill bill's) unpaid entitlement's Bureaucracy affect your life?
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2012
  15. Bfgrn
    Offline

    Bfgrn Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,569
    Thanks Received:
    1,969
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +2,048
    Ironic, THIS is what conservatives had to say in the early '90's when Clinton and Democrats tried to reform health care. But NOW their words must be discarded. When they talked about personal responsibility, it wasn't meant to apply to THEM.


    Personal Freedom, Responsibility, And Mandates
    by Robert E. Moffit

    The national debate on universal health coverage is the latest incarnation of an ancient, enduring question of political philosophy: reconciling personal liberty and the authority of the State. It is the central problem of American political culture and is at the heart of nearly every major constitutional conflict in our history.

    Americans-heirs of a classical liberal tradition, grounded in the political philosophy of John Locke and the spirit of Thomas Jefferson, in which personal freedom is paramount - harbor a deep distrust of governmental authority. We do not automatically assume that the individual is or should be subordinate to society, whether the issue is literary censorship or economic regulation.1 Therefore, any political limitation on personal freedom, regardless of prevailing wisdom, prejudices, or majority interests, must be based on a compelling argument.2

    The Taxpayer Mandate

    Policy analysts at The Heritage Foundation have wrestled incessantly with this problem, while developing a “consumer choice” plan for comprehensive health system reform, now embodied in a major legislative proposal.3 Only after extensive analysis of the peculiar distortions of the health insurance market did Heritage scholars reluctantly agree to an individual mandate.

    On this point, some observations are in order. First, much of the debate over whether we should have a mandate is, in a sense, a debate over a “metaphysical abstraction.” 4 For all practical purposes, we already have a powerful and increasingly oppressive mandate: a mandate on taxpayers.

    We all pay for the health care of those who do not pay, in two ways. First, people with private insurance pay through that insurance–even though that insurance is often the property of employers under current law. This reflects the ever-higher costs shifted to offset the billions of dollars of costs of uncompensated care in hospitals, clinics, and physicians’ offices. Second, if those who are uninsured get seriously ill and are forced to spend down their assets to cope with their huge medical bills, their care is paid for, not through employer-based or private insurance premiums, but through taxes, money taken by federal and state tax collectors to fund Medicaid or other public assistance programs that serve the poor or those impoverished because of a serious illness.

    Hospitals also have legal obligations to accept and care for those who enter seeking assistance. No responsible public official is proposing repeal of these statutory provisions, and very few physicians, if any, are prepared to deny treatment to persons seeking their help merely because they cannot afford to pay. As taxpayers and subscribers to private health insurance, the American people pick up these bills.

    Aside from current economic arrangements, the entire moral and cultural tenor of our society reinforces the taxpayer mandate. Those who are uninsured and cannot pay for their care will be cared for, and those who are insured and working will pay for that care.

    So, we already have a mandate. But it is both inefficient and unfair.

    A Snare And A Delusion


    Employer-based health insurance in this country is the product of wartime economic and tax policy of the 1940s. There is no reason why health reform in the 1990s should be governed by those unique circumstances and outdated tax policies.

    Uwe Reinhardt and Alan Krueger tell us that the tax treatment of employment-based health insurance now is sharply regressive. And, Mark Pauly confirms, it contributes to market distortions, high costs, and lack of portability in health insurance. Americans today get tax relief for health insurance on only one condition: that they get it from their employer. This has tied health insurance to the workplace in a way that no other insurance is treated. It means that if we lose or change a job, we lose our health coverage.

    Pauly also tells us that employer-based insurance hides the true costs of health care. Thus, there is no normal collision between the forces of supply and demand on even the most basic level. Most workers do not purchase health insurance; it is purchased by somebody else, usually the company. For most workers, it is a “free good,” an extra, that automatically comes with the job. At least, we live with that comfortable illusion. But, in fact, it is not free at all, and the employer gives us nothing. Because too many people think that the employer’s contribution is the employer’s money and not theirs, the consumer’s perception is distorted (as is the provider’s), and health spending is not subject to market discipline. Likewise, because too many people still do not understand this reality, “hidden taxes” through the employer mandate are politically attractive. Such a mandate thus serves as a psychological snare and an economic delusion.

    Karen Davis and Cathy Schoen suggest a payroll tax to finance reform, whereby the employer pays 8 percent and the employee pays 2 percent. If one of our tasks is to make the true costs transparent, this suggestion does not help very much.

    In his otherwise enlightening paper, Reinhardt calls attention to the virtues of a “mandated purchase” of health insurance. And he warns that calling an employer’s “mandated purchase” a “tax” comes close to debasing the English language. But, in a similar context, Reinhardt uses the word contribution to describe suspiciously similar functions. Suffice it to say, the campaign for linguistic precision is hardly advanced by using the word contibution to describe the state’s forcible extraction of citizens’ money.

    In another context, Reinhardt proposes perhaps the best single reform idea to date. He suggests a simple financial disclosure on the part of the nation’s employers, requiring every employer to put periodically on the pay stub of every worker in America something like the following: “We have paid you X thousand dollars in health benefits. This has reduced your wages by X thousand dollars.” We would add: “Have a nice day!„5

    http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/13/2/101.full.pdf
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  16. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    23,117
    Thanks Received:
    4,017
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +4,196
    if the government was not involved in the FIRST PLACE, and was not giving you and your employer a tax deduction for paying for health insurance, then you would not have to worry about them taking the tax deduction away over a certain amount spent.

    I guess it was FINE AND DANDY to have the government involved with that tax deduction.....why can't they take away what they originally giveth?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  17. PratchettFan
    Online

    PratchettFan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    3,363
    Thanks Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +385
    I have no problem with it affecting me. If it costs me a couple of hundred dollars a year to ensure that millions of my fellow Americans have access to medical care, I can live with that. I recognize that I enjoy an unusually good lifestyle (compared to the rest of the world) because of the benefits this nation provides and I see nothing particulary unfair in the idea that I pay my fair share for it.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  18. Wry Catcher
    Online

    Wry Catcher Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    20,426
    Thanks Received:
    2,627
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +2,775
    This rant brought to you by the Adult beverage industry. :eusa_shhh:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  19. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    48,864
    Thanks Received:
    5,341
    Trophy Points:
    170
    Location:
    a place called, Liberty
    Ratings:
    +6,042
    nope sorry, we weren't born into some commune..It's not OUR DUTY to take of you or anyone else while we try to WORK and TAKE CARE of our families..
     
  20. Greenbeard
    Offline

    Greenbeard VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,349
    Thanks Received:
    1,095
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    New England
    Ratings:
    +1,104
    You noticed that too, eh? :lol:
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

letter from employer healthcare insurance political comments

,

letter to employees regarding obamacare

,

sample letter for obamacare to employees

,

sample Letter to Employees About Obamacare