Lets start calling them "Muslim Attacks" rather than terror attacks

[rdean]

Hello,

The overwhelming number of these attacks are committed by Muslims with the tacit support of the Muslim World. Lets start calling them Muslim attacks rather than terror attacks. If the U.S. President is afraid to even name the enemy of freedom and decency, maybe WE should. Lets start calling them what they are, Muslim attacks.

garion13a5

Better yet, just call the religious attacks. You want to call out religion then let's call out religion. Christians in the US have murdered many people in the name of their religion in the last 40 years. Let's call out all religious attacks and pin the attacks on all religion.

You wouldn't disagree with that would you?

I would. You can deflect the blame to "religon" all you want, but the fact remainsvthere is one religon responsible for these types of atrocities.

No don't say 'you would'. Just do it.

You want to defend the whackos in your religion for killing people but blame the whackos in another religion for killing people.
How about we denounce ALL of them.

There's only one religon killing people, stop mischaracterising other religons because you don't like them.

Seems Right Wing Christian terrorists and Islamic terrorists were running neck in neck until this one. If you count this one, Islamic terrorists seem to have jumped ahead. But this guy might only be crazy, like the Christian guy at Sandy Hook.

Homegrown Extremism: Deadly Attacks Since 9/11 | The International Security Program

Course, when you add those killed at Sandy Hook and all the others killed by American Christians who just decide to kill, the homegrown violence skyrockets.

After every one of these events, it seems everyone knew the gunman was crazy. How come? It seems everyone around the gun man knew he was crazy. Around all the gun men. And yet they are still able to get the guns they want. Why is that?

 

[Syriusly]

There is no comparison between the violence perpetrated in the name of modern day Islam vs Christianity. Please spare us the Crusades reference.

So you think we should arrest all Muslims for being terrorists?

 

[Rocko]

Hello,

The overwhelming number of these attacks are committed by Muslims with the tacit support of the Muslim World. Lets start calling them Muslim attacks rather than terror attacks. If the U.S. President is afraid to even name the enemy of freedom and decency, maybe WE should. Lets start calling them what they are, Muslim attacks.

garion13a5

Better yet, just call the religious attacks. You want to call out religion then let's call out religion. Christians in the US have murdered many people in the name of their religion in the last 40 years. Let's call out all religious attacks and pin the attacks on all religion.

You wouldn't disagree with that would you?

I would. You can deflect the blame to "religon" all you want, but the fact remainsvthere is one religon responsible for these types of atrocities.

No don't say 'you would'. Just do it.

You want to defend the whackos in your religion for killing people but blame the whackos in another religion for killing people.
How about we denounce ALL of them.

There's only one religon killing people, stop mischaracterising other religons because you don't like them.

Seems Right Wing Christian terrorists and Islamic terrorists were running neck in neck until this one. If you count this one, Islamic terrorists seem to have jumped ahead. But this guy might only be crazy, like the Christian guy at Sandy Hook.

Homegrown Extremism: Deadly Attacks Since 9/11 | The International Security Program

Course, when you add those killed at Sandy Hook and all the others killed by American Christians who just decide to kill, the homegrown violence skyrockets.

After every one of these events, it seems everyone knew the gunman was crazy. How come? It seems everyone around the gun man knew he was crazy. Around all the gun men. And yet they are still able to get the guns they want. Why is that?

Oh bullshit

 

[Nosmo King]

Do you think that people who share common faith also agree with all the actions of their faithful?

The left has been arguing that fallacy for a while now For the last time - we are not including all muslims when we say islamic terrorists. To suggest that is the case is simply disengenious.

Calling terror attacks committed by Islamic radicals "Muslim attacks" paint Muslims, regardless of their complicity or approval of the attacks with the vile brush of hate most commonly wielded by the ignorant.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Hello,

The overwhelming number of these attacks are committed by Muslims with the tacit support of the Muslim World. Lets start calling them Muslim attacks rather than terror attacks. If the U.S. President is afraid to even name the enemy of freedom and decency, maybe WE should. Lets start calling them what they are, Muslim attacks.

garion13a5

Better yet, just call the religious attacks. You want to call out religion then let's call out religion. Christians in the US have murdered many people in the name of their religion in the last 40 years. Let's call out all religious attacks and pin the attacks on all religion.

You wouldn't disagree with that would you?

I would. You can deflect the blame to "religon" all you want, but the fact remainsvthere is one religon responsible for these types of atrocities.

No don't say 'you would'. Just do it.

You want to defend the whackos in your religion for killing people but blame the whackos in another religion for killing people.
How about we denounce ALL of them.

Hello,

Sadly, almost all of the wackos that are killing in the name of religion are Muslim. So Muslim attacks is accurate. Seriously, lets start using this whenever we post on this subject.

garion13a5

Currently yes. But looking back over time no, Christians have committed horrendous genocides as well in it's history. ALL of them should be condemned.

You people of any religion, keep that shit in your church, mosque, or home. PERIOD.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Are all Muslims bad?

And whats the purpose of this stupid question?

Don't want to answer?

 

[Rocko]

Do you think that people who share common faith also agree with all the actions of their faithful?

The left has been arguing that fallacy for a while now For the last time - we are not including all muslims when we say islamic terrorists. To suggest that is the case is simply disengenious.

Calling terror attacks committed by Islamic radicals "Muslim attacks" paint Muslims, regardless of their complicity or approval of the attacks with the vile brush of hate most commonly wielded by the ignorant.

Would you feel better if we added the qualifier radical, to call them radical muslim attacks,

 

[rcfieldz]

Chicago must be full of Muslims?

 

[Rocko]

Are all Muslims bad?

And whats the purpose of this stupid question?

Don't want to answer?

Hmm what do you think my answer is?

 

[Nosmo King]

Do you think that people who share common faith also agree with all the actions of their faithful?

The left has been arguing that fallacy for a while now For the last time - we are not including all muslims when we say islamic terrorists. To suggest that is the case is simply disengenious.

Calling terror attacks committed by Islamic radicals "Muslim attacks" paint Muslims, regardless of their complicity or approval of the attacks with the vile brush of hate most commonly wielded by the ignorant.

Would you feel better if we added the qualifier radical, to call them radical muslim attacks,

Making me comfortable is not as crucial as respecting Muslims who are not involved in terror attacks.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Do you think that people who share common faith also agree with all the actions of their faithful?

The left has been arguing that fallacy for a while now For the last time - we are not including all muslims when we say islamic terrorists. To suggest that is the case is simply disengenious.

Calling terror attacks committed by Islamic radicals "Muslim attacks" paint Muslims, regardless of their complicity or approval of the attacks with the vile brush of hate most commonly wielded by the ignorant.

Would you feel better if we added the qualifier radical, to call them radical muslim attacks,

Yes. That is what I call them...once it is learned that the perp has been radicalized.

Many of the foreign members of ISIS aren't even very religious...they are just seeking nirvana and an escape from their unhappy lives. They are perfect dupes for the assholes.

Political leaders need to be smarter about their terminology. They need to deal with other nations....some of which are Muslim theocracies. Tact is required.

Get it?

 

[TexM3]

Killing gays is acceptable according to Islamic law. ~50% of American muslims support islamic law.

 

[2aguy]

Even if they're under FBI investigations they still get a class G weapons license
The FBI has become so weak under barry

What is a class G weapons license?