Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

[Mr. Shaman]

Interesting, just as the tea party held the budget hostage over women's rights.

Women's rights weren't held hostage. The melodrama, sensationalism, emotion just doesn't work. Stick with logic and facts.

You're talking to a lib. Logic and facts are mortal sins in their religion.

Yeah.....we DO have a few problems with the logic & facts, supporting the concept o'.....

....talking-snakes.

 

[rdean]

Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

Why kiss "arse" when the lips taste so much "sweeter"?

Rdeanie Weenie,

Osculation seems to be the diplomatic norm (supposedly between equals), not only in the Oily Sheikdoms but in civilized countries like France.....and, believe it or not, Russia.

But kow-towing, especially exaggerated kow-towing, implying a promising blow-job a la Obami Salaami is truly a sight to behold !!!

But then, according to the sleaze-ball LibTURDS, the MONUMENTAL FRAUD, Pathological Liar and the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami is known to be a charismatically innovative bozo.

Repression and conservatism go "hand in hand". One defines the other. See for yourself.

Honest conservatives admit there is very little personal freedom under the conservative ideology.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Ancient "holy books" tend to be filled with things that are presented as being sanctioned by God but which modern enlightened people realize are morally reprehensible.

That said, book-burning holds a certain fascistic stigma that we ought to find repulsive

I find beheading just a bit more repulsive, don't you?

Yeah.....Christians are more in-tune to....

....more-traditional means....

.....o' punishment.​

 

[kaz]

Interesting, just as the tea party held the budget hostage over women's rights.

Wow, women have the "right" to have someone else pay for their abortion????

I'm pro-choice, but you're a fucking wacko...

 

[Toro]

Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

Why kiss "arse" when the lips taste so much "sweeter"?

Rdeanie Weenie,

Osculation seems to be the diplomatic norm (supposedly between equals), not only in the Oily Sheikdoms but in civilized countries like France.....and, believe it or not, Russia.

But kow-towing, especially exaggerated kow-towing, implying a promising blow-job a la Obami Salaami is truly a sight to behold !!!

But then, according to the sleaze-ball LibTURDS, the MONUMENTAL FRAUD, Pathological Liar and the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami is known to be a charismatically innovative bozo.

Repression and conservatism go "hand in hand". One defines the other. See for yourself.

Honest conservatives admit there is very little personal freedom under the conservative ideology.

Oh for FFS rdean, I outta neg you because it might look like I'm agreeing with that monumental idiot, gaytrauma.

It's outrageous to say that repression and conservatism go hand in hand, and that there is very little personal freedom under conservative ideology. It's no different than the dumbasses who say that communism and liberalism are essentially the same thing. It's an extremist statement that cherry-picks a few commonalities then applies those commonalities as representative to the entire ideology. That's ridiculous.

 

[bripat9643]

I could go into the physical intimidation of cloth manufacturers etc, for not meeting Bourbon mandates of production

What would that prove? The state has been using force to shake people down for thousands of years.

but the second part of your response illustrates a complete lack of ability to understand even the simplest notions of reality

Sorry, but no it doesn't. Your attitude is purely the result of ignorance about what went on before Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin became the pariahs they are known as today.

Like all liberals, you are ignorant as to the facts of history. Time magazine made Hitler the man of the year in 1938.

Here are some more facts about prewar liberals for your edification:

Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt - Reason Magazine

In the North American Review in 1934, the progressive writer Roger Shaw described the New Deal as “Fascist means to gain liberal ends.” He wasn’t hallucinating. FDR’s adviser Rexford Tugwell wrote in his diary that Mussolini had done “many of the things which seem to me necessary.” Lorena Hickok, a close confidante of Eleanor Roosevelt who lived in the White House for a spell, wrote approvingly of a local official who had said, “If [President] Roosevelt were actually a dictator, we might get somewhere.” She added that if she were younger, she’d like to lead “the Fascist Movement in the United States.” At the National Recovery Administration (NRA), the cartel-creating agency at the heart of the early New Deal, one report declared forthrightly, “The Fascist Principles are very similar to those we have been evolving here in America.”

Roosevelt himself called Mussolini “admirable” and professed that he was “deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.”

 

[Agit8r]

I could go into the physical intimidation of cloth manufacturers etc, for not meeting Bourbon mandates of production

What would that prove? The state has been using force to shake people down for thousands of years.

but the second part of your response illustrates a complete lack of ability to understand even the simplest notions of reality

Sorry, but no it doesn't. Your attitude is purely the result of ignorance about what went on before Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin became the pariahs they are known as today.

Like all liberals, you are ignorant as to the facts of history. Time magazine made Hitler the man of the year in 1938.

Here are some more facts about prewar liberals for your edification:

Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt - Reason Magazine

In the North American Review in 1934, the progressive writer Roger Shaw described the New Deal as “Fascist means to gain liberal ends.” He wasn’t hallucinating. FDR’s adviser Rexford Tugwell wrote in his diary that Mussolini had done “many of the things which seem to me necessary.” Lorena Hickok, a close confidante of Eleanor Roosevelt who lived in the White House for a spell, wrote approvingly of a local official who had said, “If [President] Roosevelt were actually a dictator, we might get somewhere.” She added that if she were younger, she’d like to lead “the Fascist Movement in the United States.” At the National Recovery Administration (NRA), the cartel-creating agency at the heart of the early New Deal, one report declared forthrightly, “The Fascist Principles are very similar to those we have been evolving here in America.”

Roosevelt himself called Mussolini “admirable” and professed that he was “deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.”

You seem to be confusing liberalism with other ideologies. Liberalism, properly understood, is concerned with limiting power over the individual. The belief that "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights." and that "Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good."

Authoritarianism and Hierarchy are devises of the feudal anarchy and all it's descendant ideologies, or what is properly called "the right"

 

[gautama]

I could go into the physical intimidation of cloth manufacturers etc, for not meeting Bourbon mandates of production

What would that prove? The state has been using force to shake people down for thousands of years.



Sorry, but no it doesn't. Your attitude is purely the result of ignorance about what went on before Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin became the pariahs they are known as today.

Like all liberals, you are ignorant as to the facts of history. Time magazine made Hitler the man of the year in 1938.

Here are some more facts about prewar liberals for your edification:

Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt - Reason Magazine

In the North American Review in 1934, the progressive writer Roger Shaw described the New Deal as “Fascist means to gain liberal ends.” He wasn’t hallucinating. FDR’s adviser Rexford Tugwell wrote in his diary that Mussolini had done “many of the things which seem to me necessary.” Lorena Hickok, a close confidante of Eleanor Roosevelt who lived in the White House for a spell, wrote approvingly of a local official who had said, “If [President] Roosevelt were actually a dictator, we might get somewhere.” She added that if she were younger, she’d like to lead “the Fascist Movement in the United States.” At the National Recovery Administration (NRA), the cartel-creating agency at the heart of the early New Deal, one report declared forthrightly, “The Fascist Principles are very similar to those we have been evolving here in America.”

Roosevelt himself called Mussolini “admirable” and professed that he was “deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.”

You seem to be confusing liberalism with other ideologies. Liberalism, properly understood, is concerned with limiting power over the individual. The belief that "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights." and that "Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good."

Authoritarianism and Hierarchy are devises of the feudal anarchy and all it's descendant ideologies, or what is properly called "the right"

Agitprop,

What the fuck do your posts have to do with the fucking Muslims and their CONTINUOUS threat to World Peace ?!?!?!?

As an Obamarrhoidal stooge, are you deliberately deflecting this thread from the CONTINUOUS Idiotically Insane Barbaric Islamic Madness that is spurred on by the fucking Qu'ran concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST PROFIT MOHAMMED ??????

 

[misteroboto]

What would that prove? The state has been using force to shake people down for thousands of years.



Sorry, but no it doesn't. Your attitude is purely the result of ignorance about what went on before Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin became the pariahs they are known as today.

Like all liberals, you are ignorant as to the facts of history. Time magazine made Hitler the man of the year in 1938.

Here are some more facts about prewar liberals for your edification:

Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt - Reason Magazine

You seem to be confusing liberalism with other ideologies. Liberalism, properly understood, is concerned with limiting power over the individual. The belief that "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights." and that "Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good."

Authoritarianism and Hierarchy are devises of the feudal anarchy and all it's descendant ideologies, or what is properly called "the right"

Agitprop,

What the fuck do your posts have to do with the fucking Muslims and their CONTINUOUS threat to World Peace ?!?!?!?

As an Obamarrhoidal stooge, are you deliberately deflecting this thread from the CONTINUOUS Idiotically Insane Barbaric Islamic Madness that is spurred on by the fucking Qu'ran concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST PROFIT MOHAMMED ??????

missed your shot today didnt you...

 

[gautama]

You seem to be confusing liberalism with other ideologies. Liberalism, properly understood, is concerned with limiting power over the individual. The belief that "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights." and that "Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good."

Authoritarianism and Hierarchy are devises of the feudal anarchy and all it's descendant ideologies, or what is properly called "the right"

Agitprop,

What the fuck do your posts have to do with the fucking Muslims and their CONTINUOUS threat to World Peace ?!?!?!?

As an Obamarrhoidal stooge, are you deliberately deflecting this thread from the CONTINUOUS Idiotically Insane Barbaric Islamic Madness that is spurred on by the fucking Qu'ran concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST PROFIT MOHAMMED ??????

missed your shot today didnt you...

MuslimArseLicker,

Delusional Idiots require reminders.

 

[Political Junky]

I could go into the physical intimidation of cloth manufacturers etc, for not meeting Bourbon mandates of production

What would that prove? The state has been using force to shake people down for thousands of years.

but the second part of your response illustrates a complete lack of ability to understand even the simplest notions of reality

Sorry, but no it doesn't. Your attitude is purely the result of ignorance about what went on before Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin became the pariahs they are known as today.

Like all liberals, you are ignorant as to the facts of history. Time magazine made Hitler the man of the year in 1938.

Here are some more facts about prewar liberals for your edification:

Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt - Reason Magazine

In the North American Review in 1934, the progressive writer Roger Shaw described the New Deal as “Fascist means to gain liberal ends.” He wasn’t hallucinating. FDR’s adviser Rexford Tugwell wrote in his diary that Mussolini had done “many of the things which seem to me necessary.” Lorena Hickok, a close confidante of Eleanor Roosevelt who lived in the White House for a spell, wrote approvingly of a local official who had said, “If [President] Roosevelt were actually a dictator, we might get somewhere.” She added that if she were younger, she’d like to lead “the Fascist Movement in the United States.” At the National Recovery Administration (NRA), the cartel-creating agency at the heart of the early New Deal, one report declared forthrightly, “The Fascist Principles are very similar to those we have been evolving here in America.”

Roosevelt himself called Mussolini “admirable” and professed that he was “deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.”

Weird then that Henry Ford, Lindbergh, Bush's grandfather, and others opposed to Roosevelt tried to overthrow Roosevelt. Those men, all Conservative, favored Hitler and Mussolini.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot

 

[bripat9643]

You seem to be confusing liberalism with other ideologies. Liberalism, properly understood, is concerned with limiting power over the individual. The belief that "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights." and that "Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good."

Authoritarianism and Hierarchy are devises of the feudal anarchy and all it's descendant ideologies, or what is properly called "the right"

That's the definition of 18th Century liberalism, not modern liberalism. That later is indistinguishable from fascism.

 

[bripat9643]

Weird then that Henry Ford, Lindbergh, Bush's grandfather, and others opposed to Roosevelt tried to overthrow Roosevelt. Those men, all Conservative, favored Hitler and Mussolini.

When did this fantasy supposedly occur?

 

[gautama]

Weird then that Henry Ford, Lindbergh, Bush's grandfather, and others opposed to Roosevelt tried to overthrow Roosevelt. Those men, all Conservative, favored Hitler and Mussolini.

When did this fantasy supposedly occur?

Bripat,

You're being deliberately suckered, or deflected from the main issue which is the fucking Muslims being THE continuous threat to World Peace.

As I stated to the Obamarrhoidal Agitprop:

What the fuck do your posts have to do with the fucking Muslims and their CONTINUOUS threat to World Peace ?!?!?!?

As an Obamarrhoidal stooge, are you deliberately deflecting this thread from the CONTINUOUS Idiotically Insane Barbaric Islamic Madness that is spurred on by the fucking Qu'ran concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST PROFIT MOHAMMED ??????

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

Whoops!!!!

I thought this was a thread about the Teabaggers' obsession for kissin' 1%er/high-roller ass.

My mistake.....

​

 

[gautama]

Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

Whoops!!!!

I thought this was a thread about the Teabaggers' obsession for kissin' 1%er/high-roller ass.

My mistake.....

​

SHAM,

You're a mistake....PERSONIFIED.

IOW, You're ALWAYS full of shit.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Ancient "holy books" tend to be filled with things that are presented as being sanctioned by God but which modern enlightened people realize are morally reprehensible.

That said, book-burning holds a certain fascistic stigma that we ought to find repulsive

Yet, it seems that there is a double standard present where liberals defend 'art' where Christ is depicted in a cup of urine ( funded by Taxpayers) or Christ with insects crawling over him on the Cross. AGAIN sanctioned by our government in allowing it to be shown at the Smithsonian a government funded entity.

We can't have these double standards for religious icons and or religious books. The Bible is burned on YouTube as well as the Torah and The Book of Mormon-and our tax dollars fund what has become to be known as the "Piss Christ". What is even more reprehensible is the fact the director of the Smithsonian was picketed and demanded that he step down-- NOT for the fact that he allowed Christ to be depicted on a cross with insects crawling all over the cross BUT BECAUSE he asked it to be removed.

We can’t put one religion on a pedestal and believe it is more sacred than another. And we can condone one act of desecration ( see Piss Christ and the Ant Christ) – it sends the wrong message.

Religion: Tax Money for "Piss Christ" and Ant-Covered Crucifix?

Piss Christ - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I agree, christianity and islam should both be equally mocked.

The more they're mocked, maybe the less sensitive the world will become about their religions.

 

[grunt11b]

Interesting, just as the tea party held the budget hostage over women's rights.

The democrats are just as guilty of holding it hostage over abortion as was the tea party over so called "Womans rights". Both would be guilty of not budging right? so please dont pin it on any one group when they where all involved.

 

[bodecea]

Interesting, just as the tea party held the budget hostage over women's rights.

Women's rights weren't held hostage. The melodrama, sensationalism, emotion just doesn't work. Stick with logic and facts.

You're right...the Republicans dropped that requirement.

 

[Political Junky]

Weird then that Henry Ford, Lindbergh, Bush's grandfather, and others opposed to Roosevelt tried to overthrow Roosevelt. Those men, all Conservative, favored Hitler and Mussolini.

When did this fantasy supposedly occur?

I gave a link in my post, read it.