Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

[Truthseeker420]

As I recall over 4000 died on 911 on Bush's watch so if your point is Republicans are bad for America then I agree.

 

[bripat9643]

There is nothing inherently left wing about a planned economy

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

You sure are funny!

and what sort of economy had the Bourbons run?

Leftwingers are socialists. No one supports monarchy in this day and age, so calling a leftwinger someone who opposes monarchy is absurd.

 

[CaféAuLait]

As I recall over 4000 died on 911 on Bush's watch so if your point is Republicans are bad for America then I agree.

Right, 8 months into a presidency planned by a man that Clinton was warned about and the CIA let him slip through his hands under Clinton. Oh and BTW this same man/terrorist attacked on Clinton’s watch too—remember the 93 bombings?

Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities

Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities - Nightly News - msnbc.com

State Dept. Says It Warned About bin Laden in 1996

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/17/international/asia/17osama.html

 

[Truthseeker420]

As I recall over 4000 died on 911 on Bush's watch so if your point is Republicans are bad for America then I agree.

Right, 8 months into a presidency planned by a man that Clinton was warned about and the CIA let him slip through his hands under Clinton. Oh and BTW this same man/terrorist attacked on Clinton’s watch too—remember the 93 bombings?

Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities

Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities - Nightly News - msnbc.com

State Dept. Says It Warned About bin Laden in 1996

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/17/international/asia/17osama.html

I'm no fan of Clinton. he signed NAFTA and repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act.

 

[Agit8r]

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

You sure are funny!

and what sort of economy had the Bourbons run?

Leftwingers are socialists. No one supports monarchy in this day and age, so calling a leftwinger someone who opposes monarchy is absurd.

you said that all planned economies were leftist. That simply isn't the case. Even if you are one of those delusional souls that insists that Hitler and Mussolini were leftists, you still can't possible argue that the Bourbons were, when, in fact, the original left-wing opposed them throughout.

Totalitarians/authoritarians have always suppressed those with more liberal tendencies. Lenin suppressed the left-communists, LBJ suppressed the hippies, Robespierre suppressed the Brissotins, the Federalist Party tried to suppress the Democratic Societies, and on and on.

 

[gautama]

well how about not offending the other 90 percent of muslims who arent in agreement with the radical militant douchebags that beleive they cant get their way by bombing and killing?

i mean really - the argument that in a sphere of the world we will somehow effectively and convincingly make an argument to opposed or simply be non sympathetic to militants and terrorists by doing something that will be offensive to EVERYONE in that region and that not supoprting such a thing is capitulation- well that has got to be the most thickheaded and fucking bassackward way of thiniking - its a wonder we even HAVE allies in the mid east that are muslims.

but hey - supporting delusional contradictory policies about an important issue is nothing new to the armchair soldiers of the right who think nothing of pissing on someones head and at the same time thinking they have convinced the pissee that its raining.

not everyone is as dumb as armchair neocons but you cant get armchair neocons to believe anything if it doesnt follow their ideology

remind you of any particular group???

Hey Douchebag, none of your 90% of fucking Muslims, in any significant number, ever step up to the plate to decry the continuous and idiotically insane, barbarous Islamic Madness around the World.

If these Muslim arseholes stepped up to the plate and voiced their outrage ALL THIS INSANE & WEIRD BARBAROUS ISLAMIC MADNESS WOULD COME TO A SCREECHING HALT !!!

The reason these Insane Barbaric Islamic Atrocities continue is that the Qu'ran, that Piece of Shit is concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST, PROFIT MOHAMMED whose clearly defined, MOST IMPORTANT DICTUM underlined by that arsehole is: " Make the World the Caliphate of Islam, preferably by word, by SWORD (caps mine) if necessary."

THERE IS NO OTHER ORGANIZED RELIGION IN THE WORLD THAT CARRIES ITS OVERT BLOODY POLITICAL AGENDA IN RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT !!!

A TRUE Muslim believes in this POS PROFIT Mohammed's BLOODY POLITICAL Agenda.

THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T ANY MUSLIM PUBLIC OUTCRY, IN ANY SIGNIFICANT NUMBER, AT THE CONTINUOUS IDIOTICALLY INSANE BARBAROUS ACTS OF ISLAMIC MADNESS !!!

 

[rdean]

Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

Why kiss "arse" when the lips taste so much "sweeter"?

 

[bripat9643]

you said that all planned economies were leftist. That simply isn't the case. Even if you are one of those delusional souls that insists that Hitler and Mussolini were leftists, you still can't possible argue that the Bourbons were, when, in fact, the original left-wing opposed them throughout.

The Bourbons were mercantilists. Calling their economic policies a "planned economy" is about as accurate as calling Harry Reid a "statesman." The Bourbons simply doled out favors to their lackeys, There was no "planning" whatsoever involved, just as there is no planning involved in any of the favors Congress doles out today.

Totalitarians/authoritarians have always suppressed those with more liberal tendencies. Lenin suppressed the left-communists, LBJ suppressed the hippies, Robespierre suppressed the Brissotins, the Federalist Party tried to suppress the Democratic Societies, and on and on.

Liberals are totalitarians/authoritarians. They admired and defended Stalin when he was in power, and they even admire Hitler and Mussolini. The New Deal was modeled on Mussolini's economic policies.

No one supports monarchy today. So calling a liberal someone who opposes monarchy is nonsensical. Of course, those who defend the indefensible will say virtually anything, no matter how irrational or dishonest.

 

[gautama]

Let's Kiss the Arse of Those Who Kill Us.

Why kiss "arse" when the lips taste so much "sweeter"?

Rdeanie Weenie,

Osculation seems to be the diplomatic norm (supposedly between equals), not only in the Oily Sheikdoms but in civilized countries like France.....and, believe it or not, Russia.

But kow-towing, especially exaggerated kow-towing, implying a promising blow-job a la Obami Salaami is truly a sight to behold !!!

But then, according to the sleaze-ball LibTURDS, the MONUMENTAL FRAUD, Pathological Liar and the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami is known to be a charismatically innovative bozo.

 

[snjmom]

Liberals are totalitarians/authoritarians.

This is not true. Totalitarians/authoritarians come under many guises, but the essence of liberal is the opposite of totalitarian/authoritarian thinking.

Did you consider the USSR a liberal country?

 

[editec]

I just read the interesting opening of the article by Andrew C. McCarthy on:

"More On Koran Burning"

By Andrew C. McCarthy.

"Jonah, my problem with the Koran burning stunt is that it is counterproductive. I hear what you’re saying about decency. But on that score, I don’t find the burning any more offensive in principle than I do its opposite extreme: the bizarro hyper-reverence with which the Koran is handled by the Defense Department.

Down at Gitmo, the Defense Department gives the Koran to each of the terrorists even though DoD knows they interpret it (not without reason) to command them to kill the people who gave it to them. To underscore our precious sensitivity to Muslims, standard procedure calls for the the book to be handled only by Muslim military personnel. Sometimes, though, that is not possible for various reasons. If, as a last resort, one of our non-Muslim troops must handle or transport the book, he must wear white gloves, and he is further instructed primarily to use the right hand (indulging Muslim culture’s taboo about the sinister left hand). The book is to be conveyed to the prisoners in a “reverent manner” inside a “clean dry towel.” This is a nod to Islamic teaching that infidels are so low a form of life that they should not be touched (as Ayatollah Ali Sistani teaches, non-Muslims are “considered in the same category as urine, feces, semen, dead bodies, blood, dogs, pigs, alcoholic liquors,” and “the sweat of an animal who persistently eats [unclean things].”

Ain't it nice how we kiss the arses of those who want to, and actually, kill us.

And, our Government sets the example of how we can accomplish this wondrous mission with panache !!!

You know I just tried to read your post but all these childish geegaw action GIFS make it difficult to read.

Hence no comment about whatever it is you wrote

 

[misteroboto]

well how about not offending the other 90 percent of muslims who arent in agreement with the radical militant douchebags that beleive they cant get their way by bombing and killing?

i mean really - the argument that in a sphere of the world we will somehow effectively and convincingly make an argument to opposed or simply be non sympathetic to militants and terrorists by doing something that will be offensive to EVERYONE in that region and that not supoprting such a thing is capitulation- well that has got to be the most thickheaded and fucking bassackward way of thinking - its a wonder we even HAVE allies in the mid east that are muslims.

but hey - supporting delusional contradictory policies about an important issue is nothing new to the armchair soldiers of the right who think nothing of pissing on someones head and at the same time thinking they have convinced the pissee that its raining.

not everyone is as dumb as armchair neocons but you cant get armchair neocons to believe anything if it doesnt follow their ideology

remind you of any particular group???

Hey Douchebag, none of your 90% of fucking Muslims, in any significant number, ever step up to the plate to decry the continuous and idiotically insane, barbarous Islamic Madness around the World.

If these Muslim arseholes stepped up to the plate and voiced their outrage ALL THIS INSANE & WEIRD BARBAROUS ISLAMIC MADNESS WOULD COME TO A SCREECHING HALT !!!

The reason these Insane Barbaric Islamic Atrocities continue is that the Qu'ran, that Piece of Shit is concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST, PROFIT MOHAMMED whose clearly defined, MOST IMPORTANT DICTUM underlined by that arsehole is: " Make the World the Caliphate of Islam, preferably by word, by SWORD (caps mine) if necessary."

THERE IS NO OTHER ORGANIZED RELIGION IN THE WORLD THAT CARRIES ITS OVERT BLOODY POLITICAL AGENDA IN RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT !!!

A TRUE Muslim believes in this POS PROFIT Mohammed's BLOODY POLITICAL Agenda.

THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T ANY MUSLIM PUBLIC OUTCRY, IN ANY SIGNIFICANT NUMBER, AT THE CONTINUOUS IDIOTICALLY INSANE BARBAROUS ACTS OF ISLAMIC MADNESS !!!

why would they have to? i mean of course if you think that ALL muslims agree with actions and motivations of terrorists then i guess yeah they would ...

i mean really if you want to argue that muslims maybe should be more proactive in reclaiming their image from reactionary simpleminded jack offs - thats a possible subject

but claiming that doing something to insult a whole group pf people is justified ( or even a good strategy ) in a region where youre trying to coax people to the opinion that you arent the insensitive boorish asshole that the terrorists claim you are or that many of them just believe you are. .....

but why what i can expect from a party who also thinks its a great conventional wisdom to advance that blacks are desired in the GOP but blacks that dont go GOP are that way because they are too stupid or are satisfied being slaves

wonderful appeal

so no its a pretty stupid idea to "burn a koran" in reaction to the actions of a small group of people who are CLAIMING to speak for all muslims -

you dont win people to your point of view in the region by insulting them especially if they hold their religion particularly close.

else wy the fuck are we in afganistan trying to "help" them set up a government- or overthrowing saddam or even tacitly supporting the Libyans??

 

[gautama]

well how about not offending the other 90 percent of muslims who arent in agreement with the radical militant douchebags that beleive they cant get their way by bombing and killing?

i mean really - the argument that in a sphere of the world we will somehow effectively and convincingly make an argument to opposed or simply be non sympathetic to militants and terrorists by doing something that will be offensive to EVERYONE in that region and that not supoprting such a thing is capitulation- well that has got to be the most thickheaded and fucking bassackward way of thiniking - its a wonder we even HAVE allies in the mid east that are muslims.

but hey - supporting delusional contradictory policies about an important issue is nothing new to the armchair soldiers of the right who think nothing of pissing on someones head and at the same time thinking they have convinced the pissee that its raining.

not everyone is as dumb as armchair neocons but you cant get armchair neocons to believe anything if it doesnt follow their ideology

remind you of any particular group???

Hey Douchebag, none of your 90% of fucking Muslims, in any significant number, ever step up to the plate to decry the continuous and idiotically insane, barbarous Islamic Madness around the World.

If these Muslim arseholes stepped up to the plate and voiced their outrage ALL THIS INSANE & WEIRD BARBAROUS ISLAMIC MADNESS WOULD COME TO A SCREECHING HALT !!!

The reason these Insane Barbaric Islamic Atrocities continue is that the Qu'ran, that Piece of Shit is concocted by the Historically Documented THIEF, MASS MURDERER, RAPIST & PEDOPHILIC RAPIST, PROFIT MOHAMMED whose clearly defined, MOST IMPORTANT DICTUM underlined by that arsehole is: " Make the World the Caliphate of Islam, preferably by word, by SWORD (caps mine) if necessary."

THERE IS NO OTHER ORGANIZED RELIGION IN THE WORLD THAT CARRIES ITS OVERT BLOODY POLITICAL AGENDA IN RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT !!!

A TRUE Muslim believes in this POS PROFIT Mohammed's BLOODY POLITICAL Agenda.

THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T ANY MUSLIM PUBLIC OUTCRY, IN ANY SIGNIFICANT NUMBER, AT THE CONTINUOUS IDIOTICALLY INSANE BARBAROUS ACTS OF ISLAMIC MADNESS !!!

why wouls they have to

i mean really if you want to argue that muslims maybe should be more proactive in reclaiming their image from reactionary simpleminded jack offs - thats a possible subject

but claiming that doing something to insult a whole group pf people is justified ( or even a good strategy ) in a region where youre trying to coax people to the opinion that you arent the insensitive boorish asshole that the terrorists claim you are or that .....

but why what i can expect from a party who also thinks its a great conventional wisdom to advance that blacks are desired in the GOP but blacks that dont go GOP are that way because they are too stupid or are satisfied being slaves

wonderful appeal

so no its a pretty stupid idea to "burn a koran" in reaction to the actions of a small group of people who are CLAIMING to speak for all muslims -

you dont win people to your point of view in the region by insulting them especially if they hold their religion particularly close.

else wy the fuck are we in afganistan trying to "help" them set up a government- or overthrowing saddam or even tacitly supporting the Libyans??

Hey Douchebag, Fuck Muslims and all those who support those pigshit eaters.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Islam is not compatible with Western beliefs and ideals. Western Europe especially,made a big big mistake allowing so many Muslims to emigrate there. Their problems are only just beginning as a result. There will always be huge conflict between Islam & Western values. And this conflict is only growing larger by the day. As Islam becomes more radicalized all around the World,there is sure to be much more conflict. Things are going to get much worse before they get better. Islam will have a Reformation at some point though. But that's a long way off. Expect much more conflict & bloodshed in the future.

 

[sinister59]

I just read the interesting opening of the article by Andrew C. McCarthy on:

"More On Koran Burning"

By Andrew C. McCarthy.

"Jonah, my problem with the Koran burning stunt is that it is counterproductive. I hear what you’re saying about decency. But on that score, I don’t find the burning any more offensive in principle than I do its opposite extreme: the bizarro hyper-reverence with which the Koran is handled by the Defense Department.

Down at Gitmo, the Defense Department gives the Koran to each of the terrorists even though DoD knows they interpret it (not without reason) to command them to kill the people who gave it to them. To underscore our precious sensitivity to Muslims, standard procedure calls for the the book to be handled only by Muslim military personnel. Sometimes, though, that is not possible for various reasons. If, as a last resort, one of our non-Muslim troops must handle or transport the book, he must wear white gloves, and he is further instructed primarily to use the right hand (indulging Muslim culture’s taboo about the sinister left hand). The book is to be conveyed to the prisoners in a “reverent manner” inside a “clean dry towel.” This is a nod to Islamic teaching that infidels are so low a form of life that they should not be touched (as Ayatollah Ali Sistani teaches, non-Muslims are “considered in the same category as urine, feces, semen, dead bodies, blood, dogs, pigs, alcoholic liquors,” and “the sweat of an animal who persistently eats [unclean things].”

Ain't it nice how we kiss the arses of those who want to, and actually, kill us.

And, our Government sets the example of how we can accomplish this wondrous mission with panache !!!

oh brother , you really think we can kill everyone that hates us ?

its cheaper to make them our friends then kill them as our enemies

 

[Agit8r]

you said that all planned economies were leftist. That simply isn't the case. Even if you are one of those delusional souls that insists that Hitler and Mussolini were leftists, you still can't possible argue that the Bourbons were, when, in fact, the original left-wing opposed them throughout.

The Bourbons were mercantilists. Calling their economic policies a "planned economy" is about as accurate as calling Harry Reid a "statesman." The Bourbons simply doled out favors to their lackeys, There was no "planning" whatsoever involved, just as there is no planning involved in any of the favors Congress doles out today.

Totalitarians/authoritarians have always suppressed those with more liberal tendencies. Lenin suppressed the left-communists, LBJ suppressed the hippies, Robespierre suppressed the Brissotins, the Federalist Party tried to suppress the Democratic Societies, and on and on.

Liberals are totalitarians/authoritarians. They admired and defended Stalin when he was in power, and they even admire Hitler and Mussolini. The New Deal was modeled on Mussolini's economic policies.

No one supports monarchy today. So calling a liberal someone who opposes monarchy is nonsensical. Of course, those who defend the indefensible will say virtually anything, no matter how irrational or dishonest.

I could go into the physical intimidation of cloth manufacturers etc, for not meeting Bourbon mandates of production but the second part of your response illustrates a complete lack of ability to understand even the simplest notions of reality

 

[Mr. Shaman]

It's my opinion that Islam is incompatible with American style Democracy and Freedom, especially where womens rights are concerned.

How 'bout we settle on.....

....religion-in-general??

​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Interesting, just as the tea party held the budget hostage over women's rights.

That's different.

The Teabaggers are bound to.....

.....traditional Christian-values.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Interesting, just as the tea party held the budget hostage over women's rights.

Political Bullshit,

Yours is blatant "Moral Equivalency" bullshit.......typical of an Obamarrhoidal stooge.

Whereas I don't have problems with abortion ...... as long as the "fetus" is a painless blob of protoplasm ( a view not shared by conservatives ......and I'm not one of them.......I am a vociferous anti-Lib) .......abortion is a woman's choice with strong opposing opinions.

Thus, abortion as such is NOT a woman's right .....as I stated, it is a woman's CHOICE.

Ohhhhhhhhhhh.....and, men have GIVEN them that choice, huh???



You're (actually) tryin' to make sense, right??

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Ancient "holy books" tend to be filled with things that are presented as being sanctioned by God but which modern enlightened people realize are morally reprehensible.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGrlWOhtj3g]YouTube - Lewis Black - The Old Testament[/ame]​