Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
That is grossly ignorant. So ignorant it doesnt even bear refuting.Of course it is. It is a distinction without a difference.Colorado nullified Federal law. Alabama should do the same.The issue isn't federal law. The issue is federal court rulings. There's no supreme court ruling that says states must outlaw marijuana. So Colorado didn't nullify any such ruling.
A federal court ruling isn't 'federal law'. Making your post a non sequitur.
Of course it isn't. As the entire basis and process of each is wildly different. Federal law is a legislative action based on constitutionally granted powers. Federal court rulings relevant to this discussion are interpretations of the constition itself based on individual rights.
You may equate powers of the government with rights of people, but a rational person never would. And the law certainly doesn't.
Colorado isn't violating any federal court ruling. Nullifying your nullification arguement.
Translation: you know I'm right, you have no counter argument, and you can't even find a point to disagree with.
You're not very good at this, Rabbi.