Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So basically you just got bent over but you don't have the humility to acknowledge how ignorant your post was.You're unintelligent, if you don't know why they wouldn't show up. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, however, and say you're just a run-of-the-mill TROLL.Why wouldn't they show up? Don't they want justice? Or are they only concerned about justice for other people - while they desire to get away with their own crimes?You don't get the concern with that konradv? Or are you just that unintelligent?You don't get the concern about victims or witnesses of crime not showing up? I think you've got a problem beyond logic, lack of basic intelligence!
I wasn't talking about the criminals, rather the victims and witnesses, shortbus.So basically you just got bent over but you don't have the humility to acknowledge how ignorant your post was. See...criminals have no right to whine about "justice". That's idiotic hypocrisy at its worst. If the victim of a crime wanted true justice - they would want it for their own crimes as well. You are a very special sort of stupid konradv. You are dismissed...You're unintelligent, if you don't know why they wouldn't show up. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, however, and say you're just a run-of-the-mill TROLL.Why wouldn't they show up? Don't they want justice? Or are they only concerned about justice for other people - while they desire to get away with their own crimes?You don't get the concern with that konradv? Or are you just that unintelligent?You don't get the concern about victims or witnesses of crime not showing up? I think you've got a problem beyond logic, lack of basic intelligence!
You're reading comprehension is atrocious. No surprise considering your limited IQ. The "victims" and "withesses" in question are also criminals, asshole. They are illegals. That's why they don't want to come forward. Your inability to understand what people post and follow along is really why you should stick to coloring books and play-doh. Leave the internet to the adults, ok? Once again....you are dismissed. Please don't keep returning to class - school is out and you flunked miserably.I wasn't talking about the criminals, rather the victims and witnesses, shortbus.So basically you just got bent over but you don't have the humility to acknowledge how ignorant your post was. See...criminals have no right to whine about "justice". That's idiotic hypocrisy at its worst. If the victim of a crime wanted true justice - they would want it for their own crimes as well. You are a very special sort of stupid konradv. You are dismissed...You're unintelligent, if you don't know why they wouldn't show up. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, however, and say you're just a run-of-the-mill TROLL.Why wouldn't they show up? Don't they want justice? Or are they only concerned about justice for other people - while they desire to get away with their own crimes?You don't get the concern with that konradv? Or are you just that unintelligent?You don't get the concern about victims or witnesses of crime not showing up? I think you've got a problem beyond logic, lack of basic intelligence!
Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice. Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.It doesn't matter. Enforcing federal law is the responsibility of the federal government no matter what land it is on. You might want to learn the law before commenting on it.It was on State property, not federal property.
No...really...they can't. You don't get to simply make up your own rules and laws, snowflake. Federal law trumps state and local law and the federal government can absolutely pick up a criminal on state land.Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice
How could they do that when the criminals would simply stay off of federal lands?Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.
You seem soooooo confused right now danielpalos - so please let me simplify this for you. The federal government can grab a wanted criminal anywhere in the U.S. Full, legal authority. And they will do it under the Trump Administration. There is literally nothing you can do about it - so making up your own rules and laws on the USMB forum and trying to convince people they are real is senseless and futile.Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.
Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice. Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.It doesn't matter. Enforcing federal law is the responsibility of the federal government no matter what land it is on. You might want to learn the law before commenting on it.It was on State property, not federal property.
The federal government has no police power over the sovereign free States.No...really...they can't. You don't get to simply make up your own rules and laws, snowflake. Federal law trumps state and local law and the federal government can absolutely pick up a criminal on state land.Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice
How could they do that when the criminals would simply stay off of federal lands?Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.
Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice.You seem soooooo confused right now danielpalos - so please let me simplify this for you. The federal government can grab a wanted criminal anywhere in the U.S. Full, legal authority. And they will do it under the Trump Administration. There is literally nothing you can do about it - so making up your own rules and laws on the USMB forum and trying to convince people they are real is senseless and futile.Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.
lol. satire can be confusing to the right wing.Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice. Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.It doesn't matter. Enforcing federal law is the responsibility of the federal government no matter what land it is on. You might want to learn the law before commenting on it.It was on State property, not federal property.
Daniel, we have Federal Agents....your home country has "Federales"
Nope. But there is federal law enforcement for federal laws (which trump state and local laws per the U.S. Constitution) and federal law enforcement has full jurisdiction coast-to-coast to enforce those federal laws.There is no federal police power over the several States.
They aren't trying to "police the states" so you're strawman is senseless. They are simply enforcing federal law against the individual. The federal government is responsible for enforcing immigration laws.The federal government has no police power over the sovereign free States.No...really...they can't. You don't get to simply make up your own rules and laws, snowflake. Federal law trumps state and local law and the federal government can absolutely pick up a criminal on state land.Not if it interferes with State Courts of Justice
How could they do that when the criminals would simply stay off of federal lands?Our federales can pick them up on non-State property.
Then what are you doing now? Is this a post done post? An after-post?I never said I was leaving. I said I was done with you and your puerile silliness.
so what; 10USC311 is also, federal law; should we "start rounding up gun lovers, too"?Nope. But there is federal law enforcement for federal laws (which trump state and local laws per the U.S. Constitution) and federal law enforcement has full jurisdiction coast-to-coast to enforce those federal laws.There is no federal police power over the several States.
They are not trying to "police the states" as you absurdly put it.
You have to love left-wing hatriots. When presented with facts about the law and the enforcement of it, their response is "so what"?so whatNope. But there is federal law enforcement for federal laws (which trump state and local laws per the U.S. Constitution) and federal law enforcement has full jurisdiction coast-to-coast to enforce those federal laws.There is no federal police power over the several States.
They are not trying to "police the states" as you absurdly put it.
Well...uh....just one problem, snowflake. 10 U.S. Code § 311 doesn't have anything to do with firearms. 10 U.S. Code § 311 outlines the "Exchange of defense personnel between United States and friendly foreign countries". So if you did "round up gun lovers" under 10 U.S. Code § 311, you would be violating federal law. Not enforcing it.10USC311 is also, federal law; should we "start rounding up gun lovers, too"?
all you have is social policy on a national basis. we have a Commerce Clause. our federal problem should be solved at the federal borders, not the interior.You have to love left-wing hatriots. When presented with facts about the law and the enforcement of it, their response is "so what"?so whatNope. But there is federal law enforcement for federal laws (which trump state and local laws per the U.S. Constitution) and federal law enforcement has full jurisdiction coast-to-coast to enforce those federal laws.There is no federal police power over the several States.
They are not trying to "police the states" as you absurdly put it.
It's amazing how the left wants a lawless nation if they can't control it.
How disingenuous of the right wing. 10USC311 is about federal supremacy over the militia.Well...uh....just one problem, snowflake. 10 U.S. Code § 311 doesn't have anything to do with firearms. 10 U.S. Code § 311 outlines the "Exchange of defense personnel between United States and friendly foreign countries". So if you did "round up gun lovers" under 10 U.S. Code § 311, you would be violating federal law. Not enforcing it.10USC311 is also, federal law; should we "start rounding up gun lovers, too"?
However - in the broader spectrum of this discussion, yes - 10 U.S. Code § 311 should be enforced like any and all other laws.
You make me laugh Daniel....
It should be enforced at the border and enforced in the interior if and when someone gets passed the border. And that is the exact approach President Trump is taking.our federal problem should be solved at the federal borders, not the interior.
