Law Enforcement Can No Longer Seize Property From Innocent People In New Mexico....Wait...

ClosedCaption

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2010
53,233
6,719
1,830
Why is NM only the 2nd state to do this? Well, the payoff is too sweet!


P1-BC089_FORFEI_G_20110821181222.jpg


Last week, New Mexico became the second state to ban the practice of civil asset forfeiture, which allows state and local law enforcement agencies to seize property from innocent people.

Gov. Susana Martinez (R) signed HB 560 on Friday, which states that property can only be seized if a person is “arrested for an offense to which forfeiture applies, the person is convicted by a criminal court of the offense, and the state establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the property is subject to forfeiture.” In other words, property seizure is only permitted if a person is guilty of a crime. The bill, which received unanimous approval in the state legislature, was first introduced by Rep. Zachary Cook (R).

Under civil asset forfeiture laws across the country, people don’t have to be found guilty or charged with a crime to have their property taken from them. The laws incentivize the seizure of property to the benefit of law enforcement agencies, at the expense of innocent people — who are, often, low-income people of color. No type of property is off-limits, as cash, cars, and houses are routinely seized. And in many cases, law enforcement agencies collect assets under the guise of drug enforcement.
 
What? Republicans are taking this step? I thought that was impossible!!!
 
How does that stop cops from just robbing people? Cops rob drug dealers all the time of their money and let the dealers go knowing they wont report it.

It doesnt but at least they cant just take it and turn it in for new police toys...but they can still use it for their own toys
 
While I agree that the property should not be liquidated until the individual has been convicted, I do believe that those arrested for felonies should have ALL of their assets siezed or frozen until proven innocent.
 
ACLU New Mexico Law Enforcement Agencies Racially Profiling for Profit American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico

In one particularly egregious case in 2010, state police, Albuquerque Police Department, and Homeland Security conspired to seize $16,925 from a father and son who were on a road trip to Las Vegas. After they were initially pulled over by state troopers in Raton for driving five miles over the speed limit, the officer searched their vehicle, found the money, detained them for several hours on the size of the road, and disassembled the car. He also referred to the 60-year-old man as “boy.” When the father and son were finally able to leave, the officer told them that the ordeal “wasn’t over yet,” and they were pulled over again in Albuquerque for “improperly changing lanes.” A Homeland Security officer arrived at the scene, and took their money and car, before leaving the travelers stranded.

In 2012, the pair won a lawsuit with the help of the ACLU, and reclaimed the money that was taken from them two years prior. But most people aren’t so lucky. According to the Institute for Justice, law enforcement agencies in 42 states collect 50-100 percent of forfeiture proceeds. Before HB 560 was signed, New Mexico was one of 26 states that allows law enforcement to collect 100 percent.
 
GOOD. This is a change ive always wanted in LE.

No knock warrants and civil forfeiture were always two things I never agreed with.

I support this change 100%.
 
The intent of this process was to discourage the sale of narcotics by seizing the fruits of the illegal sales.

But...like so many government actions...it failed and became a bad thing.

I.agree. Time to end this practice.
 

Forum List

Back
Top