Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.The people are the militia. you simply appeal to ignorance of the law.the right of well regulated militia of the People. i don't contradict myself; you merely have lousy reading comprehension.
THE second does not say the right of the militia
Yes we know that so the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
The wording is not the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
i did. you are merely special pleading and resort to fallacies of composition, like is habit and custom for the right wing.yes, it did.yes, there would be more violence in Chicago or the US, without gun control laws. Prohibition is proof enough.prove that more guns means less crime.
I never said that
You said there would be more violence in Chicago without the gun laws so you prove it
Prohibition had nothing to do with guns
Read a fucking book
then, you cannot make the claim, that more guns equals less crime, since you don't keep those actual statistics.per number of guns in that population density. the right wing prefers to plead, so specially.it is about population density not guns.the law of large numbers claims you have to be full of fallacy.
OK so then use the law of large numbers to prove that states with the harshest gun laws don't have higher murder rates than the states with the least restrictive gun laws
Murder rate are stated per 100,000 so density population density is accounted for
no it's per-capita
It has nothing to do with the number of guns since you only need one gun to murder a person
They also have lower population densities.it would be higher, without those gun control laws. only the right wing, never gets it.yes, it has, even with more guns being acquired and possessed.And the gun control has not reduced the crimeChicken and the egg
They may have more gun control as a response to more crime
Really so then why despite all the harsh gun laws in IL doe they have 40 plus murders per weekend in Chicago?
Yeah...except states with little to no moronic gun control laws have really low gun murder rates......according to you that isn't possible...
gun control laws help ensure the health and safety of the State.no fucking shit Sherlock
and legal gun owners are less likely to become criminals not more likely simply because they own guns
Then why do states with the most gun control have the most crime?
Chicken and the egg
They may have more gun control as a response to more crime
And that doesn't work does it.......? Chicago has strict gun control laws.....and is passing record numbers of shooting deaths....while New York and L.A. with strict laws have lower gun murder numbers...why? Because L.A. and New York put criminals in jail longer than Chicago does....
New Orleans has lax gun controls and has a similar gun death rate
Unfortunately for Chicago, they can establish gun controls in their borders but anything goes outside their borders
As a country, we have 2.5 million people in jail. Five times the number we had thirty years ago. Prisons have not made us safer
so what?They also have lower population densities.it would be higher, without those gun control laws. only the right wing, never gets it.yes, it has, even with more guns being acquired and possessed.And the gun control has not reduced the crime
Really so then why despite all the harsh gun laws in IL doe they have 40 plus murders per weekend in Chicago?
Yeah...except states with little to no moronic gun control laws have really low gun murder rates......according to you that isn't possible...
more guns also seems to mean, more persons incarcerated.gun control laws help ensure the health and safety of the State.
Then why do states with the most gun control have the most crime?
Chicken and the egg
They may have more gun control as a response to more crime
And that doesn't work does it.......? Chicago has strict gun control laws.....and is passing record numbers of shooting deaths....while New York and L.A. with strict laws have lower gun murder numbers...why? Because L.A. and New York put criminals in jail longer than Chicago does....
New Orleans has lax gun controls and has a similar gun death rate
Unfortunately for Chicago, they can establish gun controls in their borders but anything goes outside their borders
As a country, we have 2.5 million people in jail. Five times the number we had thirty years ago. Prisons have not made us safer
Yeah and how many of those people in jail are nonviolent offenders?
We need to keep violent people off the street and come up with some alternative punishments for non violent offenders
The fact is that most felony convicts only actually serve less than 4 years
You want to stop gun crimes?
The put people who commit crimes with guns in jail for a minimum of 20 years and let the guy who was carrying an ounce of weed or coke do community service
high population densities affect people differently than low population densities.so what?They also have lower population densities.it would be higher, without those gun control laws. only the right wing, never gets it.yes, it has, even with more guns being acquired and possessed.
Really so then why despite all the harsh gun laws in IL doe they have 40 plus murders per weekend in Chicago?
Yeah...except states with little to no moronic gun control laws have really low gun murder rates......according to you that isn't possible...
When the murder rate is expresses as X per 100,000 the population density factor is nullified
The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.The people are the militia. you simply appeal to ignorance of the law.THE second does not say the right of the militia
Yes we know that so the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
The wording is not the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
more guns also seems to mean, more persons incarcerated.Then why do states with the most gun control have the most crime?
Chicken and the egg
They may have more gun control as a response to more crime
And that doesn't work does it.......? Chicago has strict gun control laws.....and is passing record numbers of shooting deaths....while New York and L.A. with strict laws have lower gun murder numbers...why? Because L.A. and New York put criminals in jail longer than Chicago does....
New Orleans has lax gun controls and has a similar gun death rate
Unfortunately for Chicago, they can establish gun controls in their borders but anything goes outside their borders
As a country, we have 2.5 million people in jail. Five times the number we had thirty years ago. Prisons have not made us safer
Yeah and how many of those people in jail are nonviolent offenders?
We need to keep violent people off the street and come up with some alternative punishments for non violent offenders
The fact is that most felony convicts only actually serve less than 4 years
You want to stop gun crimes?
The put people who commit crimes with guns in jail for a minimum of 20 years and let the guy who was carrying an ounce of weed or coke do community service
The People are the Militia. Well regulated Militia of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, to keep the unnecessary one's, in-line.The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.The people are the militia. you simply appeal to ignorance of the law.
Yes we know that so the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
The wording is not the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
statistics only cares about the law of large numbers.more guns also seems to mean, more persons incarcerated.Chicken and the egg
They may have more gun control as a response to more crime
And that doesn't work does it.......? Chicago has strict gun control laws.....and is passing record numbers of shooting deaths....while New York and L.A. with strict laws have lower gun murder numbers...why? Because L.A. and New York put criminals in jail longer than Chicago does....
New Orleans has lax gun controls and has a similar gun death rate
Unfortunately for Chicago, they can establish gun controls in their borders but anything goes outside their borders
As a country, we have 2.5 million people in jail. Five times the number we had thirty years ago. Prisons have not made us safer
Yeah and how many of those people in jail are nonviolent offenders?
We need to keep violent people off the street and come up with some alternative punishments for non violent offenders
The fact is that most felony convicts only actually serve less than 4 years
You want to stop gun crimes?
The put people who commit crimes with guns in jail for a minimum of 20 years and let the guy who was carrying an ounce of weed or coke do community service
more ILLEGAL guns
in case you didn't know there is a differene
you are rewriting the amendmentThe People are the Militia. Well regulated Militia of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, to keep the unnecessary one's, in-line.The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.Yes we know that so the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
The wording is not the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
statistics only cares about the law of large numbers.more guns also seems to mean, more persons incarcerated.And that doesn't work does it.......? Chicago has strict gun control laws.....and is passing record numbers of shooting deaths....while New York and L.A. with strict laws have lower gun murder numbers...why? Because L.A. and New York put criminals in jail longer than Chicago does....
New Orleans has lax gun controls and has a similar gun death rate
Unfortunately for Chicago, they can establish gun controls in their borders but anything goes outside their borders
As a country, we have 2.5 million people in jail. Five times the number we had thirty years ago. Prisons have not made us safer
Yeah and how many of those people in jail are nonviolent offenders?
We need to keep violent people off the street and come up with some alternative punishments for non violent offenders
The fact is that most felony convicts only actually serve less than 4 years
You want to stop gun crimes?
The put people who commit crimes with guns in jail for a minimum of 20 years and let the guy who was carrying an ounce of weed or coke do community service
more ILLEGAL guns
in case you didn't know there is a differene
you have have an incorrect argument not a valid rebuttal.you are rewriting the amendmentThe People are the Militia. Well regulated Militia of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, to keep the unnecessary one's, in-line.The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
if you are going to quote the second amendment do it correctly
The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.The people are the militia. you simply appeal to ignorance of the law.
Yes we know that so the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
The wording is not the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.Yes we know that so the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
The wording is not the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
There is a mention of bearing arms for the country
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state
you have have an incorrect argument not a valid rebuttal.you are rewriting the amendmentThe People are the Militia. Well regulated Militia of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, to keep the unnecessary one's, in-line.The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
if you are going to quote the second amendment do it correctly
The People are the Militia. Well regulated Militia of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, to keep the unnecessary one's, in-line.
The fantastical right wing literally has nothing but fallacy.
The militia is the peopleNo, well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free State. The People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The People are the Militia. There is no Individual Right to keep and bear Arms.
No the militia is the people and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
You can't have a militia without the people but you can have people without a militia therefore the people have the right to keep and bear arms so as to form a militia when necessary
There is no mention of the bearing of arms for the country it is and always will be the people's right
There is a mention of bearing arms for the country
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state
that says nothing about the militia bearing arms for the country it merely states the necessity of a militia for the security of a free state
the people's right to keep and bear arms is not qualified in fact it is not to be infringed at all
gun control laws help ensure the health and safety of the State.no fucking shit Sherlock
and legal gun owners are less likely to become criminals not more likely simply because they own guns
Then why do states with the most gun control have the most crime?
Chicken and the egg
They may have more gun control as a response to more crime
And that doesn't work does it.......? Chicago has strict gun control laws.....and is passing record numbers of shooting deaths....while New York and L.A. with strict laws have lower gun murder numbers...why? Because L.A. and New York put criminals in jail longer than Chicago does....
New Orleans has lax gun controls and has a similar gun death rate
Unfortunately for Chicago, they can establish gun controls in their borders but anything goes outside their borders
As a country, we have 2.5 million people in jail. Five times the number we had thirty years ago. Prisons have not made us safer
