Largest GOP Majority in Decades

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2010
71,635
52,723
3,605
*
Unstoppable! Invincible! Omnipotent!





Except...


Why These Democrats Flipped To Defeat Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON -- Anyone who wants to understand the current state of the Democratic Party should pay close attention to what happened this week in the House of Representatives, where Democrats cut down a GOP-backed Wall Street deregulation bill. In response, the bill's supporters avoided talking about who the legislation would have helped (hint: two big banks), focusing instead on calling its victorious opponents a bunch of flip-floppers.

"They were for this bill before they were against it," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a Goldman Sachs alum, made the same point more softly during an appearance on C-SPAN Thursday morning.

"The atmosphere is a little bit different," Himes said. "I think there were 35 Democrats who voted yes. On similar legislation in the last Congress, that number was more like 75* or so. So yes, there were some folks who looked at the same thing this Congress and thought that they felt differently about it."

* - actually 95
 
So it looks like the Democrats are not bystanders after all, and that Boehner actually needs them to pass anything.
 
Funny how a Liberal administration spent $58 billion per month to build up Wall Street, only see its legislators knock it back down.

You fucking morans crack me up. :lol:
:lol: 'morans'??
 
So it looks like the Democrats are not bystanders after all, and that Boehner actually needs them to pass anything.

Wrong again there skippy, the bill will be brought up again next week and will pass, and according to your link with a higher degree of dem support. No dem votes are needed to pass anything in the house. In fact a couple of the deregulation items were included in the omnibus bill and your dear leader signed them into law.
 
So it looks like the Democrats are not bystanders after all, and that Boehner actually needs them to pass anything.

No, but now we get to call them the PARTY OF NO

wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. should look good come 2016

that article was some spin. they act like if we "deregulate" something we are all going to DIE

Democrats love two things, strangling regulations and TAXES taxes taxes
 
Unstoppable! Invincible! Omnipotent!





Except...


Why These Democrats Flipped To Defeat Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON -- Anyone who wants to understand the current state of the Democratic Party should pay close attention to what happened this week in the House of Representatives, where Democrats cut down a GOP-backed Wall Street deregulation bill. In response, the bill's supporters avoided talking about who the legislation would have helped (hint: two big banks), focusing instead on calling its victorious opponents a bunch of flip-floppers.

"They were for this bill before they were against it," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a Goldman Sachs alum, made the same point more softly during an appearance on C-SPAN Thursday morning.

"The atmosphere is a little bit different," Himes said. "I think there were 35 Democrats who voted yes. On similar legislation in the last Congress, that number was more like 75* or so. So yes, there were some folks who looked at the same thing this Congress and thought that they felt differently about it."

* - actually 95
Why not post the actual legislation instead of a hit piece by an unreliable source?

Simply because a few Democrats call it deregulation, does not mean it IS deregulation.

We haven't had an actual deregulation of ANY industry in this country................ever.
 
articles like that from the huffferpuffer is why a lot of people are so Misinformed of what's going on in our politics. they have no integrity in their reporting. and that was nothing more but a DNC press release
 
Funny how a Liberal administration spent $58 billion per month to build up Wall Street, only see its legislators knock it back down.

You fucking morans crack me up. :lol:
The House controls the purse strings. You should have learned that in Middle School.

And propping it up doesn't equate to giving it full reign.

You just don't do a convincing wingnut impression, Mr. H. Stick to rational, albeit wrong, thinking.
 
So it looks like the Democrats are not bystanders after all, and that Boehner actually needs them to pass anything.

Wrong again there skippy, the bill will be brought up again next week and will pass, and according to your link with a higher degree of dem support. No dem votes are needed to pass anything in the house. In fact a couple of the deregulation items were included in the omnibus bill and your dear leader signed them into law.
How were the Democrats able to defeat this Bill?

Simple question.
 
Unstoppable! Invincible! Omnipotent!





Except...


Why These Democrats Flipped To Defeat Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON -- Anyone who wants to understand the current state of the Democratic Party should pay close attention to what happened this week in the House of Representatives, where Democrats cut down a GOP-backed Wall Street deregulation bill. In response, the bill's supporters avoided talking about who the legislation would have helped (hint: two big banks), focusing instead on calling its victorious opponents a bunch of flip-floppers.

"They were for this bill before they were against it," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a Goldman Sachs alum, made the same point more softly during an appearance on C-SPAN Thursday morning.

"The atmosphere is a little bit different," Himes said. "I think there were 35 Democrats who voted yes. On similar legislation in the last Congress, that number was more like 75* or so. So yes, there were some folks who looked at the same thing this Congress and thought that they felt differently about it."

* - actually 95
Why not post the actual legislation instead of a hit piece by an unreliable source?

Simply because a few Democrats call it deregulation, does not mean it IS deregulation.

We haven't had an actual deregulation of ANY industry in this country................ever.
Not the point, Dorkwind. The point was that the Democrats were able to defeat a Republican Bill. That's all.
 
Funny how a Liberal administration spent $58 billion per month to build up Wall Street, only see its legislators knock it back down.

You fucking morans crack me up. :lol:
:lol: 'morans'??
Definition of moran in English:
NOUN (plural same)
member of the warrior group of the Masai people of East Africa, which comprises the youngerunmarried males.

moran definition of moran in Oxford dictionary British World English US

Someone was being called a "warrior"?
 
Unstoppable! Invincible! Omnipotent!





Except...


Why These Democrats Flipped To Defeat Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON -- Anyone who wants to understand the current state of the Democratic Party should pay close attention to what happened this week in the House of Representatives, where Democrats cut down a GOP-backed Wall Street deregulation bill. In response, the bill's supporters avoided talking about who the legislation would have helped (hint: two big banks), focusing instead on calling its victorious opponents a bunch of flip-floppers.

"They were for this bill before they were against it," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a Goldman Sachs alum, made the same point more softly during an appearance on C-SPAN Thursday morning.

"The atmosphere is a little bit different," Himes said. "I think there were 35 Democrats who voted yes. On similar legislation in the last Congress, that number was more like 75* or so. So yes, there were some folks who looked at the same thing this Congress and thought that they felt differently about it."

* - actually 95
Why not post the actual legislation instead of a hit piece by an unreliable source?

Simply because a few Democrats call it deregulation, does not mean it IS deregulation.

We haven't had an actual deregulation of ANY industry in this country................ever.
Not the point, Dorkwind. The point was that the Democrats were able to defeat a Republican Bill. That's all.

now you're all for Obstruction. You dem/libs are such hypocrites. it's laughable
Do you ever stand on principles?
 
Unstoppable! Invincible! Omnipotent!





Except...


Why These Democrats Flipped To Defeat Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON -- Anyone who wants to understand the current state of the Democratic Party should pay close attention to what happened this week in the House of Representatives, where Democrats cut down a GOP-backed Wall Street deregulation bill. In response, the bill's supporters avoided talking about who the legislation would have helped (hint: two big banks), focusing instead on calling its victorious opponents a bunch of flip-floppers.

"They were for this bill before they were against it," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a Goldman Sachs alum, made the same point more softly during an appearance on C-SPAN Thursday morning.

"The atmosphere is a little bit different," Himes said. "I think there were 35 Democrats who voted yes. On similar legislation in the last Congress, that number was more like 75* or so. So yes, there were some folks who looked at the same thing this Congress and thought that they felt differently about it."

* - actually 95
Why not post the actual legislation instead of a hit piece by an unreliable source?

Simply because a few Democrats call it deregulation, does not mean it IS deregulation.

We haven't had an actual deregulation of ANY industry in this country................ever.
Not the point, Dorkwind. The point was that the Democrats were able to defeat a Republican Bill. That's all.

now you're all for Obstruction. You dem/libs are such hypocrites. it's laughable
Do you ever stand on principles?
What is it you are imagining this time?
 
Unstoppable! Invincible! Omnipotent!





Except...


Why These Democrats Flipped To Defeat Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON -- Anyone who wants to understand the current state of the Democratic Party should pay close attention to what happened this week in the House of Representatives, where Democrats cut down a GOP-backed Wall Street deregulation bill. In response, the bill's supporters avoided talking about who the legislation would have helped (hint: two big banks), focusing instead on calling its victorious opponents a bunch of flip-floppers.

"They were for this bill before they were against it," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a Goldman Sachs alum, made the same point more softly during an appearance on C-SPAN Thursday morning.

"The atmosphere is a little bit different," Himes said. "I think there were 35 Democrats who voted yes. On similar legislation in the last Congress, that number was more like 75* or so. So yes, there were some folks who looked at the same thing this Congress and thought that they felt differently about it."

* - actually 95
Why not post the actual legislation instead of a hit piece by an unreliable source?

Simply because a few Democrats call it deregulation, does not mean it IS deregulation.

We haven't had an actual deregulation of ANY industry in this country................ever.
Not the point, Dorkwind. The point was that the Democrats were able to defeat a Republican Bill. That's all.

now you're all for Obstruction. You dem/libs are such hypocrites. it's laughable
Do you ever stand on principles?
What is it you are imagining this time?

that's your thing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top