Language of Closet Racism

So you just ignored his words there because you don't like the truth he spoke? What he said there in bold is the truth, you're mentally ill if you deny it. His dream is not the retarded crap you spew.

We don't ignore the words that are pertinent and which can be agreed upon. Equality is one thing; blaming white people every time you stub your toe isn't one of them.

And no, it's no more "the truth" than his marriage was faithful. We can all listen to his dream speech. Trying to rewrite it after the fact just doesn't impress me.
 
Indeed, white people don't owe you shit either. You don't like how you are treated? Take your black ass back to the jungle. News flash: this nation would survive without peanut butter, stop lights jazz and crack cocaine. And you can go suck the cock of every black wannabe eager to put an X behind his name as if he is important. It still doesn't change the fact of history STARTING with white people creating the US and ending with WHITE PEOPLE letting you vote.


76-head_up_ass.jpg
 
We don't ignore the words that are pertinent and which can be agreed upon. Equality is one thing; blaming white people every time you stub your toe isn't one of them.

And no, it's no more "the truth" than his marriage was faithful. We can all listen to his dream speech. Trying to rewrite it after the fact just doesn't impress me.

Mr Bass points are exactly what King said unless you believe King was playing blame whitey in those statements. Don't twist Mr Bass' position you dumb toubab. His words was the truth and to deny it is to have mental illness.
 
The Civil war was about preserving Union you dumb illiterate jackass, not a goodwill act to free blacks, get your head out of rectum and see reality.

Preserving the union WHY, you dumb spade? Oh yea.. because the north was flexing it's fucking federal arm in southern economics STARTING with slavery in the new states. Ever hear of the Missouri Compromise you dumb jail monkey? What STATE RIGHT did you think the confederacy was trying to protect? Indeed, no slave shed a single tear when a white president read the Emancipation Proclimation, eh midnight?
 
Mr Bass points are exactly what King said unless you believe King was playing blame whitey in those statements. Don't twist Mr Bass' position you dumb toubab. His words was the truth and to deny it is to have mental illness.

Again, King said a lot of things that we don't take as gold. Specifially, while he was fucking women other than his wife we probably don't thing the infidelity laden pillow talk is worth embedding into a national holiday. We accept his dream speech on the basis of equality. We do NOT accept every sentence the man ever stated as mana from heaven just because you need a scapegoat for your ethnic failures.
 
Preserving the union WHY, you dumb spade? Oh yea.. because the north was flexing it's fucking federal arm in southern economics STARTING with slavery in the new states. Ever hear of the Missouri Compromise you dumb jail monkey? What STATE RIGHT did you think the confederacy was trying to protect? Indeed, no slave shed a single tear when a white president read the Emancipation Proclimation, eh midnight?

The South strongly defended slavery because of economic reasons, their entire economy was based on it, the North was industrialised and wanted more industrialisation. The South resisted industrialisation. The fight was never about freeing blacks nor ending slavery, it was about the North wanting to stop th spread of slavery in new states.
 
The South strongly defended slavery because of economic reasons, their entire economy was based on it, the North was industrialised and wanted more industrialisation. The South resisted industrialisation. The fight was never about freeing blacks nor ending slavery, it was about the North wanting to stop th spread of slavery in new states.

why dont you read that last sentence one more time, negro. Try to time it in between grabbing your crotch and pouring a drink from your 40oz for your dead homiez.
 
Again, King said a lot of things that we don't take as gold. Specifially, while he was fucking women other than his wife we probably don't thing the infidelity laden pillow talk is worth embedding into a national holiday. We accept his dream speech on the basis of equality. We do NOT accept every sentence the man ever stated as mana from heaven just because you need a scapegoat for your ethnic failures.


Srawman, his liasons with other women are irrelevant to his fight for Civil Rights for blacks and lets not forget the dirty tactics of Hoover who tried to get King to commit suicide and unlawfully wiretapped and recorded King. His adulterous affairs in no way negates the truth he spoke. If thats the case, every goodwill act by whites is negated by the crimes and domestic terrorism whites carried out against blacks.
 
why dont you read that last sentence one more time, negro. Try to time it in between grabbing your crotch and pouring a drink from your 40oz for your dead homiez.

For economic, not morally reasons nor out of care and mercy for blacks you jackass.
 
Srawman, his liasons with other women are irrelevant to his fight for Civil Rights for blacks and lets not forget the dirty tactics of Hoover who tried to get King to commit suicide and unlawfully wiretapped and recorded King. His adulterous affairs in no way negates the truth he spoke. If thats the case, every goodwill act by whites is negated by the crimes and domestic terrorism whites carried out against blacks.

no, his liasons are pretty fucking relevant if you are going to continue to pretend that everything uttered out of his mouth was civil rights gold. He was just a man just like anyone else. he did not shit diamonds nor did he piss gold. THESE FACTS, much like the FACT of white founding fathers, seem to chaffe your hero worship, dude.

And hell, it's not as if you give a fuck about any goodwill by whites anyway so, hey, fuckit...
 
For economic, not morally reasons nor out of care and mercy for blacks you jackass.

yea dude.. every white person in the north just wanted to economically crush the south! Not a single white motherfucker thought slavery was worth fighting about!

:lol:


this is where you fail, spade. You disregard the righteous motives of white people just to feel like a singular victim. This is why I have no problem treating you as the racist piece of shit that you are with a little COLORFUL vocabulary. We if are all white devils then by god you can discover what that actually means instead of half assing it on the legacy of racism 40 years after the era of civil rights.
 
no, his liasons are pretty fucking relevant if you are going to continue to pretend that everything uttered out of his mouth was civil rights gold. He was just a man just like anyone else. he did not shit diamonds nor did he piss gold. THESE FACTS, much like the FACT of white founding fathers, seem to chaffe your hero worship, dude.

And hell, it's not as if you give a fuck about any goodwill by whites anyway so, hey, fuckit...


de⋅lu⋅sion: Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact.
 
de⋅lu⋅sion: Psychiatry. a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact.

your opinion of what is reasonable blows that retort all to hell, doesn't it. As does the narrow range of "facts" that you are willing to acknowledge. Point in case: that white people are who gave black people the semblance of equal rights.
 
An insult is whites who misrepresent MLK's legacy to carry out their "colourblind" hypocritical schemes by eliminating affirmative action. Consider Dr MLK's words here:


"But for a perceptive and vivid expression of culpability I would like to submit two sentences that many of you have probably heard me quote before from the pen of Victor Hugo. "If the soul is left in darkness, sins will be committed. The guilty one is not he who commits the sin but he who causes the darkness." The policy-makers of the white society have caused the darkness. It was they who created the frustrating slums. They perpetuate unemployment and poverty and oppression. Perhaps it is incontestable and deplorable that Negroes have committed crimes, but these are essentially derivative crimes. They are born of the greater crimes of the white society."


A New Sense of Direction (1968)


What MLK said right there is what Mr. Bass has been saying along and yet you call him racist? What MLK stated was the truth.

I prefer his words about his children being judged based on the "content of their character, not the color of their skin".

Apparently you have no problem judging whites based on their skin color.

As for affirmative action, it's wrong to give someone a scholarship based on race. Can you immagine if we had a Caucasion College Fund? What an uproar there would be!

Affirmative action IS judging someone based on their skin color.
 
You foolishly act as if blacks should be kissing white's ass for a few acts of goodwill as if blacks didn't deserve it fo all the crimes and oppression heaped upon them by whites.

Nope, just think racism is racism and you ought to acknowledge that if it wasn't for whites, you'd be a lot worse off today than you are. Instead, you are so busy blaming whites for all your problems you can't get passed your own racism. It's attitudes like yours that have kept so many blacks down. Crying victim and blaming whites for everything that goes wrong in your life.

Get over it!!!
 
Like Mr Bass said before jackass, black people owe white people nothing and this country wouldn't be what it is without the contributions of nonwhites, end of story. You can intellectually have a circle jerk with Jared Taylor, William Joyce and Arthur Kemp.

Ah, so whites are suppose to be grateful to the blacks but the blacks aren't suppose to be grateful to the whites?

What a hypocrite.

BTW, Just finished reading about George Washington Carver to my son. Interesting read. Terrific man. I have no problems with thanking him for Peanut Butter and more importantly, crop rotation, I have no problems with thanking the guy who discovered plasma, Charles Drew.

You're right, we wouldn't be here without the contributions of non-whites, just as you wouldn't be here without the contributions of whites.
 
Oh paleeez..... Here we go again....Evil Whitey. No other race of people are "racist". Fact is; no other group of people have helped others like the White Christian race. Through charity and humanitarian aid. The invention of the automobile, airplane, cotton gin, electricity, telephone, the submarine, on and on and on.

No.

Not evil Whitey, PB.

Evil mankind.Slavery was commonly practiced thoughout the world.

I'm just correcting the historical revisionism I keep reading here from some quarters.

The revisionist fabrication that Europeans did not raid African villages to abduct Africans to be sold in the New world needs to be set right.

Yes, Europeans did indeed send out raiding parties to abduct Africans to be sold in the slave markets of the New World.

So did Arabs of North Africa, and so did Black Africans.

Plenty of collective guilt for those of us inclined to feel guilt for things mankind did to itself in our past.

Given that so many White Americans are themselves descended from indentured servants (a form of slavery, which few people seem to understand, but which was slavery none the less) I find it hard to understand why anyone would bother to try to mitigate what Whites ALSO did to Black Africans.

If you're of early German or English stock, the likelihood is that some or all your ancestors were ALSO sold on the block at some port in the New World.

While it is true that indentured were supposed to be indentured for a set period of time, the horror stories of (for example) children who ended up serving not only thier endures, but the endenture of their parents (who'd died while endentured) too, is out there for those of you who want to read about that time.

I'd go so far as to suggest that no a single human being reading this isn't decended from people who somewhere at some time, lived under the lash.

That's how very common slavery once was, folks.

MOST of the people who came off the Mayflower were NOT free persons, for example.

MOST of the Anglos who followed the first "Pilgrims" came over as endentured persons.

MOST of the early Germans, likewise, came to America and paid for their passage by becoming endentured to the highest bidder on the docks, or, when there were no buyers on the docks, they were sold in the hinderlands as the slave trains went inland to sell them to the highest bidders.

They were often not treated especially well, believe me. Horses were more valuable than endentured servants in most cases.

American was largely originally settled and built by former slaves, both White endentured Slaves and Black slaves with no hope of ever being freed.

The Blacks were treated worse, of course, because few of them were EVER given the opportunity to free themselves by labor, plus their children were born as slaves, too.

American history is not the stellar example of free men carving a civilization out of an empty wilderness, folks.

Quite the contrary, it was man exploiting man, sometimes with a brutality that boggles the mind, that carved this nation into being.
 
Indeed, white people don't owe you shit either. You don't like how you are treated? Take your black ass back to the jungle. News flash: this nation would survive without peanut butter, stop lights jazz and crack cocaine. And you can go suck the cock of every black wannabe eager to put an X behind his name as if he is important. It still doesn't change the fact of history STARTING with white people creating the US and ending with WHITE PEOPLE letting you vote.

Peanut Butter wasn't the greatest thing that George Washington Carter did, it was crop rotation and coming up with way to feed the soil and grow better crops.

Charles Drew, another black man, discovered plasma that has saved the lives a millions.

I do think there are some backs to whom we owe a great deal, I just don't think Bass happens to be one of them.
 
The South strongly defended slavery because of economic reasons, their entire economy was based on it, the North was industrialised and wanted more industrialisation. The South resisted industrialisation. The fight was never about freeing blacks nor ending slavery, it was about the North wanting to stop th spread of slavery in new states.

Well you are right it that it had to do with economics. The south produced raw goods, the north produced manufactured goods. There was a tarrif passed that forced the south to pay more money on manufatured goods from overseas, basically forcing them to buy their goods from the north. There was no corresponding tarriff on raw goods, allowing the north to purchase their goods from anyone and basically bankrupting the south.

The north also had slavery and in many cases the slaves were treated better than poor whites. After all, a good male slave cost about $1000, a heck of a lot of money back then while the poor whites were a dime a dozen.

The last straw was when Lincoln was elected without a single vote from a southern state. South Carolina was the only southern state that listed their reason for succeeding the union as slavery. All other southern states listed states rights as their reasons.
 

Forum List

Back
Top