Bombur
VIP Member
- Jan 9, 2014
- 1,812
- 117
- 85
If you refuse to pop your head out of your socialist ass, that's your problem. "Shifting costs" is a lame attempt to obfuscate the fact that somebody is forced to pay for somebody else. The ACA is "keeping costs down" just like government backed loans is keeping college tuition rates down.More people covered is more people covered by insurance. That is different than health care inflation which is a measure of what the delivery of health care services cost.
There is a difference between shifting costs and buying more than inflation. This is just a fact. You can call me any number of names but the fact remains the same. If you don't understand these facts you will continue to say things that make you look really stupid.
If you refuse to educate yourself that is your problem.
If non payers are getting services then the payers are going to foot the bill. That's called an increase in the real world.
No ACA is keeping costs down by reducing expenses associated with needing to check people back into hospitals.
Shifting costs is called shifting costs in the real world. There isn't any attempt to "obfuscate" the issue, let alone a lame one.
So keeping people in the hospital longer cost less?
And just how many people need to be readmitted? Give me some numbers.
The problem was that they were kicking people out of hospitals before they were ready. By keeping them there longer on their initial visit they were less likely to have to come back which was a major expense and inefficiency. So less time in the hospital on average.
The ACA made this change because they looked at the data and it worked.
So where are the numbers?
Educate yourself, or not. It is up to you. I am simply letting you know you are wrong. I am not your teacher.