Lab Work Matters!

[Billy_Bob]

How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?

Excellent question!

 

[skookerasbil]

Science was always about the "lab"..........but not to the fascists who cling to the phony science that is "climate science". Tens of thousands of masters and PhD scientists from around the globe dont concur with the handful of climate scientists throwing bombs. Its because they were schooled on the importance of the scientific method and lab work which the whole climate science community has zero use for.


Consider............


In order to establish if Climate Change is a threat or a boon you will scientifically have to define it first in a scientific or legal manner. To my knowledge, that hasn't been done. In other words, for the environmentally handicapped, honest scientists could sit down at a table and describe a set of circumstances and determine that is was Climate Change or not based on that definition.
Lately, the greenies have scared us with AGCC (Anthropogenic Global Climate Change). It sounds impressive, doesn't it? However, just think about it.
Bikash says, "Day by day,the climate is changing due to global warming and greenhouse effect." And that is the common thinking of many students of the subject. But then these same people point toward weather conditions to back up their claims. Like Al Gore claimed that the latest hurricane was due to Global Warming. Like they never had hurricanes before the industrial revolution? It just doesn't make any scientific sense.
Now in order to have true AGCC you would have to have a GLOBAL climate change, not just a local. And can you point to any of that? No. Case in point, I was born in the Eastern part of South Dakota, pre WWII. There has been no substantial change in weather patterns or climate in all those years. Yes, they have had their wet years and their dry years but that was going on when Sitting Bull roamed the area and even before. I can speak for several other areas,also, but I hope you can get my point. In order for there to be GCC the climate would have to change over the whole earth and stay that way for thirty years, and that is just not happening.
The Climate Change you have been taught at school is nothing more than a bogyman. Its figure is by design shadowy. That is because, once you are convinced there is a bogyman, anyone can scare you with a bogyman. That bogyman may be a shadow of a tree, or a goat's bleat, or even a hermit living under a bridge. It could be anything. And once you are scared of something irrational, chances are, you will act irrational.
Quotes by H.L. Mencken, famous columnist: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." And, "The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it."
The reason you can't get your head around the scientific method is that Climate Change, just like a bogyman, has no tangible features.


Climate change and the scientific method

 

[skookerasbil]

more on the level of phony in climate science..............

"Al Gore likes to say that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day. What he probably doesn't know is that mother nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day, and removes about the same amount every day. While this does not 'prove' that global warming is not manmade, it shows that weather systems have by far the greatest control over the Earth's greenhouse effect, which is dominated by water vapor and clouds."






Trace gases being blamed for "global warming" is ghey

 

[skookerasbil]

LOL.......on scientific observations not being repeatable..........which means, scientific bullshit!!!

Dr Gray explains with extreme levels of astuteness >>>

The Scientific Method and Climate Science Watts Up With That

 

[mamooth]

How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?

You're unaware that stars get hotter over their life cycle? Billy's "solar physicist" pals apparently are. They fail at the basics too, just like Billy. But then, that's because they're also just internet cranks.

550 million years ago, 7000 ppm CO2 created normal temps.

650 million years ago, low CO2 levels created snowball earth.

Billy's fudgy nonsense fails completely at explaining that. Lower TSI and the greenhouse effects of CO2 explain it perfectly.

 

[Billy_Bob]

How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?

You're unaware that stars get hotter over their life cycle? Billy's "solar physicist" pals apparently are. They fail at the basics too, just like Billy. But then, that's because they're also just internet cranks.

550 million years ago, 7000 ppm CO2 created normal temps.

650 million years ago, low CO2 levels created snowball earth.

Billy's fudgy nonsense fails completely at explaining that. Lower TSI and the greenhouse effects of CO2 explain it perfectly.

And no proof in support of your statements.. LOL fucking moron..

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How did you arrive at TSI being 5% less than today?

You're unaware that stars get hotter over their life cycle? Billy's "solar physicist" pals apparently are. They fail at the basics too, just like Billy. But then, that's because they're also just internet cranks.

550 million years ago, 7000 ppm CO2 created normal temps.

650 million years ago, low CO2 levels created snowball earth.

Billy's fudgy nonsense fails completely at explaining that. Lower TSI and the greenhouse effects of CO2 explain it perfectly.

Oh, I see. So you merely centered everything around the Imaginary Climate Driving properties of CO2 and arrived at "the Sun HAD to be cooler, because CO2 is so so so bitching!"

And you keep trying to convince us you're not a Cult

 

[Billy_Bob]

Lab Work Matters as Dr Tim Ball points out In his latest OPed.

"From the start, Richard Lindzen, former professor of meteorology at MIT, said about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis: The consensus was reached before the research had even begun. The IPCC virtually ignored evidence that showed the hypothesis wrong, including failed predictions. Instead of revisiting their science, they moved the goal posts from global warming to climate change and recently climate disruption. Mainstream media have aided and abetted them with misleading and often completely scientifically incorrect stories. These are usually a reflection of their political bias.

A recent example appeared from the BBC, triggered by more evidence that contradicts the hypothesis, that human produced CO2 is almost the sole cause of global warming. The egregious example is the BBC report on the first images from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2). See also Anthony Watts’ report from the AGU."

It seems shoddy reporting and outrageous claims, about the new CO2 sensing satellite, unsupported by facts have brought the AGW meme some unwanted attention and proof they lied.

Source

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Lab Work Matters as Dr Tim Ball points out In his latest OPed.

"From the start, Richard Lindzen, former professor of meteorology at MIT, said about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis: The consensus was reached before the research had even begun. The IPCC virtually ignored evidence that showed the hypothesis wrong, including failed predictions. Instead of revisiting their science, they moved the goal posts from global warming to climate change and recently climate disruption. Mainstream media have aided and abetted them with misleading and often completely scientifically incorrect stories. These are usually a reflection of their political bias.

A recent example appeared from the BBC, triggered by more evidence that contradicts the hypothesis, that human produced CO2 is almost the sole cause of global warming. The egregious example is the BBC report on the first images from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2). See also Anthony Watts’ report from the AGU."

It seems shoddy reporting and outrageous claims, about the new CO2 sensing satellite, unsupported by facts have brought the AGW meme some unwanted attention and proof they lied.

Source

That's how you can tell the AGW crowd is a cult.

WE need to cut all funding for any and all "Climate" research. Just zero it out