Know why Democrats Demand 'Ethics Committee Probes' everytime one of their own get busted?

[bendog]

My my my, whatever happened to your innocent until proven guilty? You've already convicted him I see.

Nancy should have just kicked him out. Surely she has that power! LOL

 

[Doubledareme]

Let's hope so. But let's also hope that in the case of real abuse, that it is handled swiftly while the evidence is much more than unsubstantiated nonsense.

I can never get behind the concept that all it takes to convict someone, public or in a court of law, is to make an accusation. That is just morally wrong.

She said he said will never go away. What should go away, eyewitness testimony. We know it's for shit.

And when the pattern is clear you don't need videotape.

He said/She Said is just as morally ambiguous. Sorry, but no one's life, reputation, or livelihood should be on the block on the basis of just an accusation. There is a reason we say you have a right to confront your accuser. Far to many abuses have occured in the past, and will occur in the future if we dont' nip this in the bud.

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

report it always report it. In the event it is useful to getting the filth put away.

Had it been reported Moore would have done all he could to lock these girls up, and they knew it.

 

[Doubledareme]

You have a photo of someone molesting a child?

just molesting a woman. you know the victim? so it's ok if it isn't 14 years old? interesting your thought pattern.

Show us the photo?

Since he didn't touch her and she's wearing a flack jacket, please try again.

didn't need to, he already admitted it. so you're wrong. BTW, a fairly popular photo today.

it shows the hypocrisy of the left. and you fall into that.

He didn't grab her tits. He snatched a kiss. And she slapped a butt. Fun and games that now looks really bad.

 

[jc456]

She said he said will never go away. What should go away, eyewitness testimony. We know it's for shit.

And when the pattern is clear you don't need videotape.

He said/She Said is just as morally ambiguous. Sorry, but no one's life, reputation, or livelihood should be on the block on the basis of just an accusation. There is a reason we say you have a right to confront your accuser. Far to many abuses have occured in the past, and will occur in the future if we dont' nip this in the bud.

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

report it always report it. In the event it is useful to getting the filth put away.

Had it been reported Moore would have done all he could to lock these girls up, and they knew it.

How you figure? If they would have gone to the cops back then, then today going back their 38 years we'd have fking evidence!! what a fking concept?

 

[jc456]

just molesting a woman. you know the victim? so it's ok if it isn't 14 years old? interesting your thought pattern.

Show us the photo?

Since he didn't touch her and she's wearing a flack jacket, please try again.

didn't need to, he already admitted it. so you're wrong. BTW, a fairly popular photo today.

it shows the hypocrisy of the left. and you fall into that.

He didn't grab her tits. He snatched a kiss. And she slapped a butt. Fun and games that now looks really bad.

 

[Darkwind]

Let's hope so. But let's also hope that in the case of real abuse, that it is handled swiftly while the evidence is much more than unsubstantiated nonsense.

I can never get behind the concept that all it takes to convict someone, public or in a court of law, is to make an accusation. That is just morally wrong.

She said he said will never go away. What should go away, eyewitness testimony. We know it's for shit.

And when the pattern is clear you don't need videotape.

He said/She Said is just as morally ambiguous. Sorry, but no one's life, reputation, or livelihood should be on the block on the basis of just an accusation. There is a reason we say you have a right to confront your accuser. Far to many abuses have occured in the past, and will occur in the future if we dont' nip this in the bud.

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

 

[jc456]

She said he said will never go away. What should go away, eyewitness testimony. We know it's for shit.

And when the pattern is clear you don't need videotape.

He said/She Said is just as morally ambiguous. Sorry, but no one's life, reputation, or livelihood should be on the block on the basis of just an accusation. There is a reason we say you have a right to confront your accuser. Far to many abuses have occured in the past, and will occur in the future if we dont' nip this in the bud.

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

still no pattern presented. one offs are highly unusual. so,

 

[Doubledareme]

She said he said will never go away. What should go away, eyewitness testimony. We know it's for shit.

And when the pattern is clear you don't need videotape.

He said/She Said is just as morally ambiguous. Sorry, but no one's life, reputation, or livelihood should be on the block on the basis of just an accusation. There is a reason we say you have a right to confront your accuser. Far to many abuses have occured in the past, and will occur in the future if we dont' nip this in the bud.

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

 

[BluesLegend]

OP, Pelosi the leader of the Democratic party and a member of congress for decades was completely unaware a ranking member of her party is a serial sexual harasser who had to buy his victims silence with tax dollars??? Doesn't seem credible to me.

 

[jc456]

He said/She Said is just as morally ambiguous. Sorry, but no one's life, reputation, or livelihood should be on the block on the basis of just an accusation. There is a reason we say you have a right to confront your accuser. Far to many abuses have occured in the past, and will occur in the future if we dont' nip this in the bud.

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

 

[Doubledareme]

The reason you can confront them is because of she said he said. If there was other evidence you wouldn't need that as you'd being tying to fight the evidence not the accuser. The type of evidence you want would make rape a crime nearly everyone could get away with, not to mention murder. You'd need film at 11 in nearly all case.

We have your DNA. Yeah, but it was consensual rough sex. She likes it. Oh okay, have a nice day.

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia

 

[jc456]

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161783

he gets a lot of publicity for someone that didn't exist I'll give you that.

 

[Doubledareme]

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161783

he gets a lot of publicity for someone that didn't exist I'll give you that.

That's because, like all myths with a large following, it's a very good tool to manipulate and control the stupid.

 

[BluesLegend]

That simply is not true. We have been, for at least 30 years, teaching women that if you are abused or raped, go to the cops and get the evidenced documented.

I simply disagree with the notion that all it takes to ruin someone is an accusation.

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161790

Could absolutely have happened, its supported by science.

 

[BluesLegend]

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161783

he gets a lot of publicity for someone that didn't exist I'll give you that.

That's because, like all myths with a large following, it's a very good tool to manipulate and control the stupid.

You remind me of Herbert, Trek fans will understand. Embrace science, God and Jesus will make sense to you then.

 

[Doubledareme]

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161783

he gets a lot of publicity for someone that didn't exist I'll give you that.

That's because, like all myths with a large following, it's a very good tool to manipulate and control the stupid.

You remind me of Herbert, Trek fans will understand. Embrace science, God and Jesus will make sense to you then.

The personification of God is the ultimate blaspheme. And Jesus was a Jew who had no time at all for Gentiles. He was much the son of God as I am.

 

[Doubledareme]

Most don't report and you can disagree all you like but that won't change a thing. The reality is what it is.

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161790

Could absolutely have happened, its supported by science.

Science doesn't support gods having sex with virgins. And Mary was no virgin. A maiden, a nubile, a young woman not a virgin.

And there are two ration positions on God. Either He is within all things or he is within no things. He would be nothing like a human. No things is the only rational position based upon the total lack of evidence for God or gods acting upon the universe. When things fall up then we will speak of your God.

 

[BluesLegend]

Yes, the reality is that this never happened unless she can prove it. Given a 40 year gap....I'm going with it never happened.

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161790

Could absolutely have happened, its supported by science.

Science doesn't support gods having sex with virgins. And Mary was no virgin. A maiden, a nubile, a young woman not a virgin.

And there are two ration positions on God. Either He is within all things or he is within no things. He would be nothing like a human. No things is the only rational position based upon the total lack of evidence for God or gods acting upon the universe. When things fall up then we will speak of your God.

Hence you remind me of Herbert.

 

[Doubledareme]

It's rape not a moon landing. There is no video. We can't prove that Jesus existed so, no Jesus. Goodbye, Christianity.

And you go with that idea, which is why so many never come forward, ever. People like you dismiss them out of hand are why men get away with raping men, women, and children. With your kind around that can.

well certainly there is evidence that jesus existed. what there isn't evidence of were his abilities. wow.

There's absolutely no evidence worth a damn. Just another myth and his life is based on much older myths, starting with he was born to a virgin. Didn't happen.

Jesus in comparative mythology - Wikipedia
View attachment 161790

Could absolutely have happened, its supported by science.

Science doesn't support gods having sex with virgins. And Mary was no virgin. A maiden, a nubile, a young woman not a virgin.

And there are two ration positions on God. Either He is within all things or he is within no things. He would be nothing like a human. No things is the only rational position based upon the total lack of evidence for God or gods acting upon the universe. When things fall up then we will speak of your God.

Hence you remind me of Herbert.

I am completely open to existence of God but there is simply no evidence for His existence. Ours we know of, as best we can conclude, but His is completely unknown and even more likely, unknowable. He is the answer for those unable to accept that there is no answer (and childish enough to believe such a thing). That is not, Herbert.

Had you been raised without the concept known as God, you would not be a believer. You have Daddy issues, eternal ones.

And fun as this might be we now return to Mall-rat Roy and the evidence against him being a moral and decent person which the evidence, by his own admission shows, he clearly is not.

 

[Thinker101]

just molesting a woman. you know the victim? so it's ok if it isn't 14 years old? interesting your thought pattern.

Show us the photo?

Since he didn't touch her and she's wearing a flack jacket, please try again.

didn't need to, he already admitted it. so you're wrong. BTW, a fairly popular photo today.

it shows the hypocrisy of the left. and you fall into that.

He didn't grab her tits. He snatched a kiss. And she slapped a butt. Fun and games that now looks really bad.

Sure, that's why Franken has apologized and is laying low...what a fricken moron.