Kim Davis Uproar Shows That Breaking The Law Is Only Okay When Progressives Do It

Kim Davis Uproar Shows How Lawlessness Is Only Okay When Liberals Do It

Well duh! We already knew that. Its fine to break the law when you are part of the protect class thanks to the government so white,straight,christian,conservatives need not apply.
Show us any progressives who got away with Contempt of Court.

Lois Lerner got away with contempt of CONGRESS. Next
You have to show that....got a link?
 
Kim Davis Uproar Shows How Lawlessness Is Only Okay When Liberals Do It

Well duh! We already knew that. Its fine to break the law when you are part of the protect class thanks to the government so white,straight,christian,conservatives need not apply.
Show us any progressives who got away with Contempt of Court.

Lois Lerner got away with contempt of CONGRESS. Next

You're trying to indict the Republican Congress as your example of liberal hypocrisy?

lol, good one.
 
Kim Davis Uproar Shows How Lawlessness Is Only Okay When Liberals Do It

Well duh! We already knew that. Its fine to break the law when you are part of the protect class thanks to the government so white,straight,christian,conservatives need not apply.
Show us any progressives who got away with Contempt of Court.

Lois Lerner got away with contempt of CONGRESS. Next
You have to show that....got a link?

Google is your friend and it's common knowledge. You failed, miserably.
 
Kim Davis Uproar Shows How Lawlessness Is Only Okay When Liberals Do It

Well duh! We already knew that. Its fine to break the law when you are part of the protect class thanks to the government so white,straight,christian,conservatives need not apply.
Show us any progressives who got away with Contempt of Court.

Lois Lerner got away with contempt of CONGRESS. Next

You're trying to indict the Republican Congress as your example of liberal hypocrisy?

lol, good one.

Was she found in contempt or not? Why yes, yes she was. You have also failed....miserably
 
Kim Davis Uproar Shows How Lawlessness Is Only Okay When Liberals Do It

Well duh! We already knew that. Its fine to break the law when you are part of the protect class thanks to the government so white,straight,christian,conservatives need not apply.

Yep, this is a continued attack on Christianity.

Nothing less

-Geaux
So you are a supporter of Christian Sharia Law.

That's not worth a thoughtful response.

But please, try again

-Geaux
 
Only to those who feel the Supreme Court does not rule on the constitutionality of legislation.
We (the millions of Americans who supported Defense-of-Marriage, et al) don't like the ruling.

We've embarked upon a path to overturn that ruling.

That, or modify the Constitution, in order to bullet-proof Defense of Marriage et al, against judges on the Supreme Court, engaging in forcible social re-engineering.

This may only require a few years, after January 20, 2017.

Or it may take decades.

But was has been declared, and The People will rise to the challenge, setting aside the filth and perversion (homosexuality) being advanced by so-called Gay Rights activists.

En garde.
 
Kim Davis Uproar Shows How Lawlessness Is Only Okay When Liberals Do It

Well duh! We already knew that. Its fine to break the law when you are part of the protect class thanks to the government so white,straight,christian,conservatives need not apply.
Show us any progressives who got away with Contempt of Court.

Lois Lerner got away with contempt of CONGRESS. Next
You have to show that....got a link?

Google is your friend and it's common knowledge. You failed, miserably.
I did look it up after that post...they did not eventually charge Lerner with contempt. Maybe if you took your own advice. :lol:
 
Only to those who feel the Supreme Court does not rule on the constitutionality of legislation.
We (the millions of Americans who supported Defense-of-Marriage, et al) don't like the ruling.

We've embarked upon a path to overturn that ruling.

That, or modify the Constitution, in order to bullet-proof Defense of Marriage et al, against judges on the Supreme Court, engaging in forcible social re-engineering.

This may only require a few years, after January 20, 2017.

Or it may take decades.

But was has been declared, and The People will rise to the challenge, setting aside the filth and perversion (homosexuality) being advanced by so-called Gay Rights activists.

En garde.

And our first entry for Most Delusional Post of the Day.
 
What is more lovable is [your] concern your marriage is threatened by other married couples.
 
Last edited:
What is more lovable is [your] concern your marriage is threatened by other married couples.
There is no such thing as 'marriage' between two women or two men.

Regardless of what the misguided majority-opinion says on the Supreme Court.

It is the right of The People to seek a redress of grievances.

That is coming, soon enough, now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top