Kim Davis loses again...

Statistikhengst

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2013
45,564
11,756
2,070
deep within the statistical brain!!
This graphic tells it all:

KDloses3-660x330.jpg



And here is the actual document denying her injunction:

103-ORDER-denying-injunction-pending-appeal.pdf

BOOM.

FYI.

Discuss. Is Kim Davis smart enough to know when to give up and simply be a human being?
 
She is a Christian who defended her Constitutional right to her freedom to follow her faith. She's defending her faith and the Constitution as it was written. The Supreme Court had no right to change the laws of the land - permitting same sex marriage. It was not their place.
 
She is a Christian who defended her Constitutional right to her freedom to follow her faith. She's defending her faith and the Constitution as it was written. The Supreme Court had no right to change the laws of the land - permitting same sex marriage. It was not their place.


Such STUPIDITY.........Davis took an oath which specifically stated that her duties entailed issuing marriage licenses.....She no longer can say that she is just a private citizen and she did NOT campaign for the job stating that she would not perform SOME of her duties.
 
The Constitution supports her right to freedom of religion and her job has no right to change the rules midstream and force her to go against her own conscience and her own faith, Dante.
 
She is a Christian who defended her Constitutional right to her freedom to follow her faith. She's defending her faith and the Constitution as it was written. The Supreme Court had no right to change the laws of the land - permitting same sex marriage. It was not their place.


Such STUPIDITY.........Davis took an oath which specifically stated that her duties entailed issuing marriage licenses.....She no longer can say that she is just a private citizen and she did NOT campaign for the job stating that she would not perform SOME of her duties.

The best part of the arguments of the crazies is the law was different BEFORE she swore her oath.

Imagine a Mayor, a Governor, or a President saying they did not have to obey the law of the land because it changed AFTER they swore their oath?

Madness
 
She is a Christian who defended her Constitutional right to her freedom to follow her faith. She's defending her faith and the Constitution as it was written. The Supreme Court had no right to change the laws of the land - permitting same sex marriage. It was not their place.


Such STUPIDITY.........Davis took an oath which specifically stated that her duties entailed issuing marriage licenses.....She no longer can say that she is just a private citizen and she did NOT campaign for the job stating that she would not perform SOME of her duties.

The best part of the arguments of the crazies is the law was different BEFORE she swore her oath.

Imagine a Mayor, a Governor, or a President saying they did not have to obey the law of the land because it changed AFTER they swore their oath?

Madness

It is a perverse and wicked law and if the founding fathers were alive they would wholeheartedly agree with Kim Davis's refusal to participate, Dante.
 
Her appeal will go absolutely nowhere and her office will still continue to issue marriage licences.
 
It says, Pending an appeal.
appeal away.

We are a nation of laws, not of people, religious faiths, or gods

If we were a nation that upheld our constitution and the law of the land the Supreme Court would never have been able to get away with overruling the will of the people and voting on a law they had no business voting on in the first place.

The same people who complain about Kim Davis I did not see respond to the duly elected Barack Obama when he ignored the immigration laws, Dante. Why?
 
Jeremiah
The Constitution supports her right to freedom of religion and her job has no right to change the rules midstream and force her to go against her own conscience and her own faith, Dante.

You're plain wrong on this one. Her job is being the County Clerk, not a religious person.

Her religious faith if it can be accommodated, will be accommodated if the accommodation can meet the requirements set forth in our laws. We are a nation of laws, not religious faiths.

Her conscience cannot be, whatever that may be, cannot be damaged by outside influences. It is up to her to weigh her choices. The state legislature will not be meeting to change the laws to suit her demands.
 
She was targeted for her faith as a Christian. It's called persecution and it should not be happening, Dante.
 
Her appeal will go absolutely nowhere and her office will still continue to issue marriage licences.
With her name on them as long as she holds the office of County Clerk. It comes with the check she gets

Her argument is nothing then sovereign citizen bullshit with a religious twist. A land where laws can be ignored solely on the basis of one's conscience. I refuse to pay taxes over 10% as that is good enough for Jesus and that ought to be enough for Uncle Sam. lol.
 
She is a Christian who defended her Constitutional right to her freedom to follow her faith. She's defending her faith and the Constitution as it was written. The Supreme Court had no right to change the laws of the land - permitting same sex marriage. It was not their place.


Kim Davis is the new face of the religious right: Angry, marginalized and increasingly desperate

As their numbers dwindle and their cultural influence wanes, Evangelicals are seizing power any way they can

Kim Davis is the new face of the religious right: Angry, marginalized and increasingly desperate - Salon.com

 

Forum List

Back
Top