Killing The Tyrannical Bureaucracy

I had a complaint?

Picking the right parents made the blob rich.

The OP says the blob is going to change the system.... Do you think that is the case or not?

I’m sure you won’t give a yes or no answer....because you can’t.
so whats with the meme if his parents made him rich??
 
Let's face it. We are being basically controlled by a tyrannical bureaucracies. With a weak POTUS (as we have now) unelected, rich, 'movers and shakers' can direct huge tranches of American citizen's mandated tax levies to change Federal policy without even one congressional vote! Much less YOUR vote.

Anyway, I believe we are selecting Trump because he said he would act like a dictator. The UNSAID part of that is that we know Trump Loves America and the Constitution, we know by his actions and by his stalwart defiance of all the lawfare the Democrat party throws at him. We can see him unwavering and making a commitment to purge DC of all the Marxists and the corruption they have caused. He will be like a 'tyrant' to them but he will be our savior.
Yup. Been saying it for years. To the greater extent the US is ruled by unelected beurocracies. The house, and Senate are just dogs lapping up scraps at the table.
 
Yup. Been saying it for years. To the greater extent the US is ruled by unelected beurocracies. The house, and Senate are just dogs lapping up scraps at the table.

Getting rid of Chevron Deference is the first step in ending the problem.
 
Bureaucracies aren't supposed to make the rules. No one voted for them. What's your point pussy?
Yes, they do make the rules based on the law passed.

No legislator body votes on every line item in government fuckup.
 
Getting rid of Chevron Deference is the first step in ending the problem.
imo it depends on how the Sup Ct does it. For example, more so now than even when that case came about, no sane person wants another person up stream, or up wind, dumping literal shit upon them. And 450 elected quasi crooks don't have any expertise in not poisoning us all.

But we have an agency selecting, and paying, the very bureaucrats, who write administrative regulations, judging whether they are legal it not allowing us to use our property, or even necessary. And a court with a real judge is powerless to overrule the agency.
 
imo it depends on how the Sup Ct does it. For example, more so now than even when that case came about, no sane person wants another person up stream, or up wind, dumping literal shit upon them. And 450 elected quasi crooks don't have any expertise in not poisoning us all.

But we have an agency selecting, and paying, the very bureaucrats, who write administrative regulations, judging whether they are legal it not allowing us to use our property, or even necessary. And a court with a real judge is powerless to overrule the agency.

The agencies defending the rules can bring in expert witnesses to explain the situation. Or Congress can write better laws.
 
The agencies defending the rules can bring in expert witnesses to explain the situation. Or Congress can write better laws.
From personal experience, imo administrative law in areas like social security/medicaid eligibility, immigration (when not overloaded with people claiming amnesty even though they are not possibily elgibile), insurance coverage .... WORKS. More efficiently and timely, and with independent administrative judges with expert knowledge in a field .... than with our overburdened courts and litigious society.

But when the agency writes the regs, makes an initial determination and THEN still picks one of its own employees (who can NOT be picked if the agency doesn't "like" them .... I don't think a citizen is gonna get a even shot. And the point of Chevron is that once an agency makes a determination of what a reg says and applies that to a citizen .... a "real" court has no power to consider the actual facts as they apply.
 
From personal experience, imo administrative law in areas like social security/medicaid eligibility, immigration (when not overloaded with people claiming amnesty even though they are not possibily elgibile), insurance coverage .... WORKS. More efficiently and timely, and with independent administrative judges with expert knowledge in a field .... than with our overburdened courts and litigious society.

But when the agency writes the regs, makes an initial determination and THEN still picks one of its own employees (who can NOT be picked if the agency doesn't "like" them .... I don't think a citizen is gonna get a even shot. And the point of Chevron is that once an agency makes a determination of what a reg says and applies that to a citizen .... a "real" court has no power to consider the actual facts as they apply.

Which is why Chevron has to die.
 

Forum List

Back
Top