Fueri
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 6,304
- 4,015
- 1,065
You're hopelessly dishonest given that rewrite of our exchange. Just piss off you fucking transparent liar!That AND the origin of the false equivalency came from your post #50;Where's all this violent vs non-violent shit you are pulling out of your ass now? Sure wasn't in that post, you fucking dolt.
You were the one to present the false equivalence, one being Wiener's non-violent crime of sexting a 15 YO, and comparing it to the very violent crime of assault on his wife and brandishing a gun. Deflect much or is your memory just clouded over will horseshit biscuits floating around inside there?!He's a fucking dick, no doubt, but he's on the 'special tier'. For instance, why isn't that sick fuck Wiener in jail? He should be getting raped in the shower as we speak......
Your reference to that is misdirected, because the wife beater was not elected to Congress, shit for brains. Another indicator that your recall is thoroughly fucked! The Southern States, like South Carolina where the wife beater was seated in their legislature, have a very long history of corruption since Jim Crow. Your reference was incorrect and unsupported with facts!You made a reference to geography and him being a good old boy because of it. I stated, correctly dumbass, that this sort of special treatment was common to people in congress, irrespective of geography or party.
All you're trying to do now is deflect to avoid taking responsibility for your previous misconceptions and errors. And don't try again to drag me into the weeds again to avoid addressing the subject at hand. You made the criminal comparison between that wife beater and Wiener, and all I did was point out that you were committing a logical error for your own reasons. Don't like it? Don't make the glaring errors in logic then smartass!
No, I took only issue with the references to geography and offered weiner as an example of another idiot getting away with murder.
I did not say one was better, worse, that they were equivalent or anything else except in their both getting special treatment.
Then you hopped in with this claim of false equivalence. It is your flaw in logic that lead to that flawed assertion, as simply leveling it does not in any way validate it. It continues to be your inability to see that which keeps you defending your nonsensical position.
My claim is, and was, simply that Congress people, no matter the state, would get special treatment. If you'd like to take issue with that position then do so, otherwise you're simply going in circles.
Oh bullshit you piece of crap little fucking weakling. First you falsely accused me of false equivalence where there was none, you can look up the damn definition if you doubt it. Now, when called out you resort to this.
You made a claim which I refuted, you have not supported it in any way aside from your use of flawed logic in a weak attempt to undercut my position, while still offering no support for your own, and resort to unwarranted ad hominem attacks; and now attempt to declare victory through further use of those tactics when you have no argument, and run like a little bitch.
Get fucked.
Last edited: