The House of Representatives took on eminent domain abuses:
House passes bill to fight unfair seizure of private property
by Audrey Hudson
02/29/2012
House passes bill to fight unfair takings of private property - HUMAN EVENTS
Thats not the same as permanent legislation protecting private property from eminent domain sharpshooters. It is a start. Should conservatives get enough seats in the Senate there is a chance permanent legislation, signed into law by the president, will come next. Hussein would veto such a bill. Add that to the reasons he has to go.
Remember, it was the Supreme Court that gave us Kelo? So there is every chance the SCOTUS would overturn any law that limits the governments power to tax. Keep that in mind if you think the Supreme Court is going to overturn Hillarycare II. The High Court is an instrument of government. When taxation verses average Americans private sector Americans always lose:
ObamaCare: Supreme Court may postpone ruling till 2016
By Dean Clancy on February 21, 2012
ObamaCare: Supreme Court may postpone ruling till 2016 | FreedomWorks
It is logical to assume that postponing any ruling until 2016 will soften resistence. That is why it is imperative that Congress repeal the Affordable Care now even if it takes a veto-proof majority in both houses.
State and local governments that use eminent domain to seize private property for economic development would lose federal funding for two years under legislation passed by the House on Tuesday.
House passes bill to fight unfair seizure of private property
by Audrey Hudson
02/29/2012
House passes bill to fight unfair takings of private property - HUMAN EVENTS
Thats not the same as permanent legislation protecting private property from eminent domain sharpshooters. It is a start. Should conservatives get enough seats in the Senate there is a chance permanent legislation, signed into law by the president, will come next. Hussein would veto such a bill. Add that to the reasons he has to go.
Remember, it was the Supreme Court that gave us Kelo? So there is every chance the SCOTUS would overturn any law that limits the governments power to tax. Keep that in mind if you think the Supreme Court is going to overturn Hillarycare II. The High Court is an instrument of government. When taxation verses average Americans private sector Americans always lose:
Why is that important? Because while Congress lacks any power in the Constitution to take over the health care industry, it does have the power to tax. And if it can persuade the Court that the health care mandate is really just a valid exercise of the taxing power, then the chances go up that the Court will find ObamaCare constitutional. The logic of this situation is paradoxical:
ObamaCare: Supreme Court may postpone ruling till 2016
By Dean Clancy on February 21, 2012
ObamaCare: Supreme Court may postpone ruling till 2016 | FreedomWorks
It is logical to assume that postponing any ruling until 2016 will soften resistence. That is why it is imperative that Congress repeal the Affordable Care now even if it takes a veto-proof majority in both houses.