Keep Nazi analogies out of gun debate, says who? JEWS

sigh... I suppose you're right...

if the government ever comes for me, I should meekly accept my fate like a good sheep...

You can do whatever you want, it is just a matter of deciding if you want to end your life that day or not. It is really that simple.

Would you rather go along quietly...? and die later of deprivation in a government prison...?

or would you rather go down fighting, right there and then... mebbe taking out a few of the assholes before you go down...?

A glimpse inside of the mind of the Timothy McVeighs of the world.
 
sigh... I suppose you're right...

if the government ever comes for me, I should meekly accept my fate like a good sheep...

You can do whatever you want, it is just a matter of deciding if you want to end your life that day or not. It is really that simple.

Except a serious portion of our military will not be compliant, like they were in Germany (Oathkeepers). Many more soldiers will defect once they do, and they'll have several millions volunteers like myself ready to do the dirty work for them.

Maybe when you grow up you will understand.
 
You can do whatever you want, it is just a matter of deciding if you want to end your life that day or not. It is really that simple.

Would you rather go along quietly...? and die later of deprivation in a government prison...?

or would you rather go down fighting, right there and then... mebbe taking out a few of the assholes before you go down...?

A glimpse inside of the mind of the Timothy McVeighs of the world.

This is precisely why we don't want background checks, because the people in charge will declare all government meaningful dissension as a mental illness.
 
Would you rather go along quietly...? and die later of deprivation in a government prison...?

or would you rather go down fighting, right there and then... mebbe taking out a few of the assholes before you go down...?

A glimpse inside of the mind of the Timothy McVeighs of the world.

This is precisely why we don't want background checks, because the people in charge will declare all government meaningful dissension as a mental illness.

Oh I see, no background checks. So any murderer, rapist and felon has the right to own a weapon? Is THAT what you are promoting?
 
so sorry, but the ADL or any other group get to tell me what I can or can't do

Well, they are anti-defamation, but they aren't gonna physically come stop you from doing it

The same freedom of speech that allows them express their dislike of people saying that allows those people to tell them too bad KMA.
BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO MONOPOLY ON HISTORY OR HISTORIC REFERENCES.
Regardless of their having been victims of the Nazis. The reference made is valid and as far as I am concerned they can all go jump in a lake.
 
The whole "Nazis disarmed Jews" thing is just another of many false analogies the whackjobs make which bring discredit to those of us who are opposed to gun control. It is one of those pathetic red herrings used to "prove" that Nazis are left wing. :lol:

Dianne Feinstein is a Jew. You know...the broad leading the gun control movement. The American gun control movement is a left wing movement, not an extreme right wing (Nazi) one.

You ever hear of the ACLU being a big second amendment protector? Those Jews are real big on all the Constitutional rights EXCEPT that one. :lol:

If you want to win the war, you have to get your minds right, kids. This stupid battle over Nazis being left wing is going to cost you the war. You are getting yourselves all confused. If you want to find a Nazi wannabe, look in the mirror.
 
Last edited:
The whole "Nazis disarmed Jews" thing is just another of many false analogies the whackjobs make which bring discredit to those of us who are opposed to gun control.

Wait, are you saying Jews were allowed to own guns in Nazi Germany?

And only partisans argue where Hitler was on the political spectrum.

Hitler was right-wing Authoritarian, like the leaders of the Corporate Republican and Corporate Democratic Parties, both servants to the International Banks.
us2012.php


axeswithnames.gif
 
Last edited:
The whole "Nazis disarmed Jews" thing is just another of many false analogies the whackjobs make which bring discredit to those of us who are opposed to gun control.

Wait, are you saying Jews were allowed to own guns in Nazi Germany?

A little slow on the uptake, eh?

I am saying the idiots are comparing apples to oranges. There. Is that clear enough for you?

It's like saying Obama is the same as Hitler because they both had railroads.

Then along comes a guy like you to say, "Wait, are you saying Hitler DID NOT have railroads?"

The point sails right over you.

Hitler's (Nazi) gun control has nothing to do with Dianne Feinstein's (Jew) gun control. You have to be one seriously stupid fuck to even make that comparison.
 
Last edited:
So why should we keep the truth out of the debate?

Are you reading averse, or can't parrots read?

There is NO WAY Jews in Germany could have fought off the Nazis with personal firearms. Just like every whacko who takes on the police, they all end up the same way...dead.

You folks are so stupid, I am amazed you survive crossing the street.



I think the whole take-away (when it comes to Hitler and the gun control debate) is that governments can and DO turn pretty shitty in a heartbeat, and it's not completely whacky or looney to think that one day you may be defending yourself and your family from a gov't that was once sworn to protect you. I'm not saying it's going to happen tomorrow, I'm just saying it's possible.

Q: Why do you need an AR-15?

A: Because there's been literally thousands of examples in history - long ago and VERY recent - of (1) gov'ts spiraling out of control with power, and/or (2) temporary or long term economic collapses, and if either of those happen I want to have the most effective means of defending myself.

People these days don't know how to do anything, and if these very complex food supply chains are halted for even just a few weeks (due to a collapse in the financial market, ect), things will get nasty.



.
 
Last edited:
So why should we keep the truth out of the debate?

Are you reading averse, or can't parrots read?

There is NO WAY Jews in Germany could have fought off the Nazis with personal firearms. Just like every whacko who takes on the police, they all end up the same way...dead.

You folks are so stupid, I am amazed you survive crossing the street.



I think the whole take-away (when it comes to Hitler and the gun control debate) is that governments can and DO turn pretty shitty in a heartbeat, and it's not completely whacky or looney to think that one day you may be defending yourself and your family from a gov't that was once sworn to protect you. I'm not saying it's going to happen tomorrow, I'm just saying it's possible.

Q: Why do you need an AR-15?

A: Because there's been literally thousands of examples in history - long ago and VERY recent - of (1) gov'ts spiraling out of control with power, and/or (2) temporary or long term economic collapses, and if either of those happen I want to have the most effective means of defending myself.



.

The answer to the questions, "Why do you need an AR-15?" is this: I do not have to justify my exercising of a right. Why do you NEED porn?
 
It's like saying Obama is the same as Hitler because they both had railroads.

Then along comes a guy like you to say, "Wait, are you saying Hitler DID NOT have railroads?"

It's rather difficult to herd millions of Jews onto railroad cars for mass extermination when they're armed, have you not watched 5:55 of that video? A handful of 200-300 Jews kept the entire Nazi military out for over a month; imagine if hundreds of thousands of Jews had not surrendered their weapons earlier?
 
Back to the Nazi thing.


Hitler's Germany had railroads.
Obama's America has railroads.

Hitler's Germany used the railroads to transport Jews for extermination.
Therefore, Obama's America will use railroads to transport Jews for extermination.

The flaw in this thinking is obvious when put this way, because the crazy leaps and illogic are plainly stated.


Those who compare the attempts at gun control to Hitler are making the exact same crazy leaps and illogic. They are just not stating it so plainly. They connect those dots internally. Someone drew those dot on their minds.

Whoever writes on a blank mind first has the advantage.

But here is what is going on in their minds:

Hitler had gun control.
Obama wants gun control.

Hitler used gun control to make it easier to exterminate Jews.
Therefore, Obama will use gun control to make it easier to exterminate Us!


Stupid.
 
It's like saying Obama is the same as Hitler because they both had railroads.

Then along comes a guy like you to say, "Wait, are you saying Hitler DID NOT have railroads?"

It's rather difficult to herd millions of Jews onto railroad cars for mass extermination when they're armed, have you not watched 5:55 of that video? A handful of 200-300 Jews kept the entire Nazi military out for over a month; imagine if hundreds of thousands of Jews had not surrendered their weapons earlier?

And this has WHAT to do with Dianne Feinstein's attempts at gun control, exactly?

This is seriously your argument? "Because Hitler"?
 
It's like saying Obama is the same as Hitler because they both had railroads.

Then along comes a guy like you to say, "Wait, are you saying Hitler DID NOT have railroads?"

It's rather difficult to herd millions of Jews onto railroad cars for mass extermination when they're armed, have you not watched 5:55 of that video? A handful of 200-300 Jews kept the entire Nazi military out for over a month; imagine if hundreds of thousands of Jews had not surrendered their weapons earlier?

wow... you missed his point.
 
Yes, Jews say to...wait, no...SOME Jews say that! Some say the opposite!

gun-control-nazi-v5-600.jpg

Do you have any idea how many Jews owned guns before Hitler's gun control act? I don't however a Jewish friends father who had been in a labor camp in WW2 told me that the average person didn't own a gun anyway. For one, he said, they were too expensive. I think we have enough laws on the books and don't need any more but isn't it a little strange that so many Jews are pro gun control? Schumer, Bloomberg, Feinstein, the list goes on. Just saying, not trying to judge
 
Yes, Jews say to...wait, no...SOME Jews say that! Some say the opposite!

gun-control-nazi-v5-600.jpg

Do you have any idea how many Jews owned guns before Hitler's gun control act? I don't however a Jewish friends father who had been in a labor camp in WW2 told me that the average person didn't own a gun anyway. For one, he said, they were too expensive. I think we have enough laws on the books and don't need any more but isn't it a little strange that so many Jews are pro gun control? Schumer, Bloomberg, Feinstein, the list goes on. Just saying, not trying to judge

I don't get it. Why would Jews be wary of an angry, misinformed and bigoted mob?
 
What I don't get is you why you guys keep trying to defend yourselves on that platform. If you took a poll, you'd get a 95% disapproval rate (at minimum). I no longer need to continue fighting you on this issue, you defeat yourselves when you defend it.
 
What I don't get is you why you guys keep trying to defend yourselves on that platform. If you took a poll, you'd get a 95% disapproval rate (at minimum). I no longer need to continue fighting you on this issue, you defeat yourselves when you defend it.

I am opposed to gun control. But I am also oppoosed to idiots who make "Because Hitler" arguments. They are seriously undermining the pro-gun movement with stupid shit like that.

That's a Glenn Beck level of dumb.
 

Forum List

Back
Top