Katie's law, unconstitutional?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AmyNation, Nov 20, 2012.

  1. AmyNation
    Offline

    AmyNation Road Warrior Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,021
    Thanks Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Currently stationed at the kitchen table
    Ratings:
    +1,019
  2. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    72,803
    Thanks Received:
    13,390
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +24,711
  3. AmyNation
    Offline

    AmyNation Road Warrior Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,021
    Thanks Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Currently stationed at the kitchen table
    Ratings:
    +1,019
    Im not sure I like the idea of requiring all people , who have not been convicted of a crime to submit DNA.
     
  4. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,629
    Thanks Received:
    7,823
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,227
  5. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    78,579
    Thanks Received:
    9,572
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +36,626
    Because DNA has a lot of implications other than just identifying you. For instance, it could affect your insurance rates.
     
  6. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    37,023
    Thanks Received:
    7,783
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +14,620
    To me, it is the equivalent of requiring a person to testify against themselves....it breaks the 5th.... imho.

    but who really knows??
     
  7. AmyNation
    Offline

    AmyNation Road Warrior Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,021
    Thanks Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Currently stationed at the kitchen table
    Ratings:
    +1,019
    DNA is intrinsically more private than a finger print, IMO.
     
  8. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    34,582
    Thanks Received:
    4,789
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +15,712
    I dont think they analyze the DNA that deeply when they do it for forensic purposes.

    DNA profiling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
  9. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,629
    Thanks Received:
    7,823
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,227
    They can give you a full body cavity search before jailing you. I dont know anything more intrusive than that.
     
  10. AmyNation
    Offline

    AmyNation Road Warrior Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,021
    Thanks Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Currently stationed at the kitchen table
    Ratings:
    +1,019
    Ha!

    Well yes. However a body cavity search falls under insuring the saftey of others. Finger printing you makes sure you are who you say you are.

    You should need a warrant for DNA, it shouldnt be something the government
    is automatically entitled to when someone is arrested.
     

Share This Page