RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
She allowed her personal bias to cloud her judgement on a CONSTITUTIONAL matter
She was acting as one interpreting the Constitution? Or she was acting as a school administrator who objected to the practice ad Elmer claims?
What was her title and from what authority was she acting at the time?
If one aspires to be a Supreme Court Justice one is expected to put the Constitution first NOT personal bias and opinion.
One should always put principles first. The Constitution means nothing in light of one's true principles. If people thought like you, the Constitution would have been improved and brought into compliance with such principles as abolition and universal suffrage.
Principles always come first when you're dealing with someone who truly stands for anything. You treat the Law as God and worship the words of corpses as immutible commandments.
Sometimes those corpses are wrong.
People like you are why our Government has usurped more power then allowed and continues to do so.