Toro
Diamond Member
Are racists Christians?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From the fossil record, to the modern science of genetics, all evidence supports the fact that life evolved from the single cell to the present diversity. The majority of Christians find the evidence of evolution convincing, and not in conflict with their religion.
I consider myself an agnostic simply because I personally do not know if a diety exist or not. What you know or don't know, I have no way of knowing. So if you say that you believe, I do not find that to challenge my belief, or lack of it, at all. However, if you say that the fossil record, of which I have seen a great deal, is something other than it is, then you had best have evidence.
So Just because I cannot clearly understand how humans came into being it means God exists?
There are many things I do not understand but it just proves that I do not understand everything.
there is only one God, and it's the same God of 3 religions, but it's the humans and who falsify the message of god to invent trinity and other concepts.
__________________[/B]
Are you saying fossil evidence refutes evolution? So elephants, the carrion crow, apes, and all haven't changed over the years?all living fossils refute all form of evolution
I have always believed that atheism and darwinism are just another doctrines or religions ...no more.
atheism/darwinism are based upon matrerialism...but their arguments and swear at theists is laughable.
hence I want to ask what is the proof of atheists of their doctrine (God non-existence)?
z'atheists should show a materialist proof of their doctrine since it's always their path of reasoning.
good luck
there is only one God, and it's the same God of 3 religions, but it's the humans and who falsify the message of god to invent trinity and other concepts.I have always believed that atheism and darwinism are just another doctrines or religions ...no more.
atheism/darwinism are based upon matrerialism...but their arguments and swear at theists is laughable.
hence I want to ask what is the proof of atheists of their doctrine (God non-existence)?
z'atheists should show a materialist proof of their doctrine since it's always their path of reasoning.
good luck
A quick question on Christiainity before you go to deep into this thread.
Is it true that
1)The God of Judaism is the same God of Christianity?
2) The Jewish God has a compact with Jews that Christians claim was voided
3) This contract was voided when Christ died on the cross?
4)Christ never stated that this voided the original compact between God and man?
5)The arguement for the erasure of such contract is actually convoluted and questionable unless you repeat Christian authority. The same authorities that have a vested interest in the promotion of Christianity?
6)This is not the only questionable theological position Christianity has taken when it concerns the basis and purpose of the religion.
Are racists Christians?
the racists are the darwinists, darwin was the hero of Hitler...
Well that was interesting. Actually sharks and crocs are in there as well. But is it a surprise that some species haven't evolved because there was no need to do so?
I don't believe on father christmas; I can prove it
I don't believe on Dracula, I can prove it.
atheism is a doctrine, and followers should prove it "scientifically"!, otherwise they must stay agnostics at least.
Athesim? I need no faith nor religion to NOT believe in something that cannot be proven.
Darwin was a christian
From the fossil record, to the modern science of genetics, all evidence supports the fact that life evolved from the single cell to the present diversity. The majority of Christians find the evidence of evolution convincing, and not in conflict with their religion.
I consider myself an agnostic simply because I personally do not know if a diety exist or not. What you know or don't know, I have no way of knowing. So if you say that you believe, I do not find that to challenge my belief, or lack of it, at all. However, if you say that the fossil record, of which I have seen a great deal, is something other than it is, then you had best have evidence.
completely false!
all living fossils has defied evolution hypothsis and even refute it
"The evolution in action" of J. Huxley and other biologists is simply the observation of demographic facts, local fluctuations of genotypes, geographical distributions. Often the species concerned have remained practically unchanged for hundreds of centuries! Fluctuation as a result of circumstances, with prior modification of the genome, does not imply evolution, and we have tangible proof of this in many panchronic species-
Pierre-Paul Grassé, Treatise of Zoology
-Bats have remained
unchanged for 50 million years
-a bony of 210 millions years unchanged
-A 410-million-year-old Clacanth fossil
Clacanth was baptised as "missing link" before fishing tens of it in 40s
-A 450-million-year-old horseshoe crab is no different to specimens alive today.
-Australian lungfish from the Devonian period (408-360 million years ago) unchanged!
-A 155-Million-Year-Old Drogonfly
-lizard unchanged since 40 million years
-a skate presents exactly the same characteristics of today and dated from 245 million years.
so where's this f*king evolution "fact" ??
Are racists Christians?
the racists are the darwinists, darwin was the hero of Hitler...
Athesim? I need no faith nor religion to NOT believe in something that cannot be proven.
Aah! but you have faith in yourself to believe there is know God. Thus your lying to yourself as well as others. You do need faith.
I don't believe on father christmas; I can prove it
I don't believe on Dracula, I can prove it.
atheism is a doctrine, and followers should prove it "scientifically"!, otherwise they must stay agnostics at least.
I don't believe on father christmas; I can prove it
I don't believe on Dracula, I can prove it.
atheism is a doctrine, and followers should prove it "scientifically"!, otherwise they must stay agnostics at least.
You can't prove that Dracula doesn't exist. You can't prove that "Father Christmas" doesn't exist. But no sane person believes they do exist.
Athesim? I need no faith nor religion to NOT believe in something that cannot be proven.
Aah! but you have faith in yourself to believe there is know God. Thus your lying to yourself as well as others. You do need faith.
Boy, you really know how to twist words around, dontcha froggy.
Let me understand your point--atheism is impossible since citizen must believe in god regardless of what he says.
Well then, try this one on for size.
Since atheism is impossible due to that logic,every one must believe in god. This creates a contradicition in the need for a Bible or any holy book. Why teach a religion when it is impossible to escape the religious belief? Thus holy books and places of worship are truly unnecessary since people will believe--regardless of what the individual think.
It seems that all religions now need a new fundemental purpose, since teaching about god is not necessary for an individual to believe in god!! Or is it possible that religion is not necessary? Regardless, religion must serve an ulterior motive besides the teaching of god. Whether it is to subvert a population to machinations of a mad man or whatever, religion roles is not to teach about God or his commands.
How do you like that conclusion of your reasoning, froggy? Or did I miss something?
I bet you never realized that atheism is necessary in order for religion to have a purpose.
I don't believe on father christmas; I can prove it
I don't believe on Dracula, I can prove it.
atheism is a doctrine, and followers should prove it "scientifically"!, otherwise they must stay agnostics at least.
You can't prove that Dracula doesn't exist. You can't prove that "Father Christmas" doesn't exist. But no sane person believes they do exist.
Dracula and Father Christmas are modeled after real people
seriously