Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,359
- 1,830
Adding jobs. Sounds good.
Yes, 368,000 dropping out while 96,000 jobs added is great news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adding jobs. Sounds good.
Can you see which way the chart was moving when Bush took over and how he turned it around? Can you also see that the crash corresponds almost exactly with the Democrat take over and the worldwide recession?
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
The Democrats took over? Are you mentally retarded? Do you not realize that Bush was president until January of 2009?
Dems controlled Congress in 2006......down... down..... down..... down.
Can you see which way the chart was moving when Bush took over and how he turned it around? Can you also see that the crash corresponds almost exactly with the Democrat take over and the worldwide recession?
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
The Democrats took over? Are you mentally retarded? Do you not realize that Bush was president until January of 2009?
Dems controlled Congress in 2006......down... down..... down..... down.
Well, still, it's almost a million jobs better a number than what Obama faced when he took office.
YES!!!! That's it!!! Because the US was going to shed 700k jobs until 100% UE UNLESS YOUR GOD OBAMA WAS ELECTED TO SAVE AMAERICA..
Holy fuck, do you moppets hear yourselves? You ARE the worst parts of the Republican party, everything you claim to hate and it's like you can't even see it. UE should be WELL over 10%, but we get to count that 380k that fell off the ASS END as jobs created!!!! YAYAYYAYAYAY!!!!
Now, I dare you to just imagine if you can if that was happening under a Republican President.
The Democrats took over? Are you mentally retarded? Do you not realize that Bush was president until January of 2009?
Dems controlled Congress in 2006......down... down..... down..... down.
Okay, then if you believe the Democratic Congress caused the global recession then it shouldn't be hard for you to explain how they did it.
Can you see which way the chart was moving when Bush took over and how he turned it around? Can you also see that the crash corresponds almost exactly with the Democrat take over and the worldwide recession?
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
The Democrats took over? Are you mentally retarded? Do you not realize that Bush was president until January of 2009?
Dems controlled Congress in 2006......down... down..... down..... down.
Okay, then if you believe the Democratic Congress caused the global recession then it shouldn't be hard for you to explain how they did it.
The Dems didn't, nor did Bush, but both sides like to point a finger at the other for politicial gain. As to the poster, if the left thinks they can show a graph to cover when Bush happened to be the sitting POTUS than the right can be equally as deceitful and point out that the left was in charge of the purse strings.
If you guys want to continue to throw bull shit at each other, be my guest, but you are both wrong. Just sayin'.
Adding jobs. Sounds good.
Yes, 368,000 dropping out while 96,000 jobs added is great news.
Well, still, it's almost a million jobs better a number than what Obama faced when he took office.
YES!!!! That's it!!! Because the US was going to shed 700k jobs until 100% UE UNLESS YOUR GOD OBAMA WAS ELECTED TO SAVE AMAERICA..
Holy fuck, do you moppets hear yourselves? You ARE the worst parts of the Republican party, everything you claim to hate and it's like you can't even see it. UE should be WELL over 10%, but we get to count that 380k that fell off the ASS END as jobs created!!!! YAYAYYAYAYAY!!!!
Now, I dare you to just imagine if you can if that was happening under a Republican President.
They're nothing but tools. They'll "Rah! Rah! Rah!" their guys on no matter how bad they fuck up, but they 'd crucify him for the same thing if he had an R next to his name.
I just mentioned the other day in another thread how it's cracking me up how these guys bitch about welfare for big corporations while at the same time praising Obama for "saving" GM and Wall Street via corporate welfare.
Adding jobs. Sounds good.
Yes, 368,000 dropping out while 96,000 jobs added is great news.
I agree.
Okay, then if you believe the Democratic Congress caused the global recession then it shouldn't be hard for you to explain how they did it.
The Dems didn't, nor did Bush, but both sides like to point a finger at the other for politicial gain. As to the poster, if the left thinks they can show a graph to cover when Bush happened to be the sitting POTUS than the right can be equally as deceitful and point out that the left was in charge of the purse strings.
If you guys want to continue to throw bull shit at each other, be my guest, but you are both wrong. Just sayin'.
Wait a second partner. Congress does hold the purse strings what is deceitful by pointing that out?
The Dems didn't, nor did Bush, but both sides like to point a finger at the other for politicial gain. As to the poster, if the left thinks they can show a graph to cover when Bush happened to be the sitting POTUS than the right can be equally as deceitful and point out that the left was in charge of the purse strings.
If you guys want to continue to throw bull shit at each other, be my guest, but you are both wrong. Just sayin'.
Wait a second partner. Congress does hold the purse strings what is deceitful by pointing that out?
The deceitful part is blaming them for the economic collapse. It wasn't Bush and it wasn't congress.
Yes, 368,000 dropping out while 96,000 jobs added is great news.
I agree.
Less workforce participation since 1981 and that is good news? The economy was always going to recover it was just a matter of how long it took. Obama has dragged it out longer then any president before him.
If all the people that have fallen out of the work force and stopped looking for a job were actually COUNTED since obama took office, as they SHOULD BE, instead of LYING and DECEIVING the numbers as the LIBROIDS do, unemployment would be 11.4%!!.
Number of people going on welfare = Up
Number of people collecting food stamps = Up
Number of people living in poverty = Up
Unemployment numbers = Down
Let's see who can put these together logically.
Number of people going on welfare = Up
Number of people collecting food stamps = Up
Number of people living in poverty = Up
Unemployment numbers = Down
Let's see who can put these together logically.
But unemployment is lower...
Wait a second partner. Congress does hold the purse strings what is deceitful by pointing that out?
The deceitful part is blaming them for the economic collapse. It wasn't Bush and it wasn't congress.
So what then?