Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dont you love how all encompassing they are of the 4.5 BILLION years the planet has been aroundI wonder if anybody is ever convinced by those graphs Chris keeps posting again and again and again and again and. . . .?
dont you love how all encompassing they are of the 4.5 BILLION years the planet has been aroundI wonder if anybody is ever convinced by those graphs Chris keeps posting again and again and again and again and. . . .?
to have such complete data to make that call for all those years
well, clearly you arent smart enough to actually understand the raw dataIt would be nice if all the raw data was put out and accessable to everyone. And when that data was then used to make a study or produce a computer model, the authors would be transparent in their methods so that others could check or replicate that work. You know, like real science and scientists. Not like high school politics of popularity being practised in climate science today.
It would be nice if all the raw data was put out and accessable to everyone. And when that data was then used to make a study or produce a computer model, the authors would be transparent in their methods so that others could check or replicate that work. You know, like real science and scientists. Not like high school politics of popularity being practised in climate science today.
It would be nice if all the raw data was put out and accessable to everyone. And when that data was then used to make a study or produce a computer model, the authors would be transparent in their methods so that others could check or replicate that work. You know, like real science and scientists. Not like high school politics of popularity being practised in climate science today.
The argument here is NOT about the method at all. It is about claiming 30 years of data is somehow relevant to making policy decisions on something concerning the Earth which is over 4 BILLION years old.
It would be nice if all the raw data was put out and accessable to everyone. And when that data was then used to make a study or produce a computer model, the authors would be transparent in their methods so that others could check or replicate that work. You know, like real science and scientists. Not like high school politics of popularity being practised in climate science today.
The argument here is NOT about the method at all. It is about claiming 30 years of data is somehow relevant to making policy decisions on something concerning the Earth which is over 4 BILLION years old.
I think if people knew how flimsy the data was, how poor the mathematics, and how twisted the adjustments and correction were, then no one would be stupid enough to make predictions of catastrophy and few who be taken in if there were.
Half the scientists on the AGW side think it is only their small area of expertise that is at odds with the theory. They are just going along with it for 'the team'.
Here's what 6.4% ice loss per decade looks like....
It would be nice if all the raw data was put out and accessable to everyone. And when that data was then used to make a study or produce a computer model, the authors would be transparent in their methods so that others could check or replicate that work. You know, like real science and scientists. Not like high school politics of popularity being practised in climate science today.
Now hold on just a minute there Slick!I think if people knew how flimsy the data was, how poor the mathematics, and how twisted the adjustments and correction were, then no one would be stupid enough to make predictions of catastrophy and few who be taken in if there were.
Half the scientists on the AGW side think it is only their small area of expertise that is at odds with the theory. They are just going along with it for 'the team'.
Are the Maldives underwater as a direct result of the "loss of ice"?
Are the Maldives underwater as a direct result of the "loss of ice"?
Are you going to ever ask a relevant question?
July sea ice second lowest: oldest ice begins to melt
Arctic sea ice extent averaged for July was the second lowest in the satellite record, after 2007. After a slowdown in the rate of ice loss, the old, thick ice that moved into the southern Beaufort Sea last winter is beginning to melt out.
Arctic Sea Ice News & Analysis
How old is your record? If you are using satellites then the record is 30 years old, meaning useless. If your using some other record it is probably no more then 50 or 60 years old, again useless.
You realize that in middle time period there was a green Greenland? Right? That it was warmer then then now? That we have only had about 20 years of minimal warming. something like 1/3 of a degree?
Further the poles were warmer for longer from 1920's to late 1940's. And no I am not going to link it, it was extensively linked too in several threads YOU participated in and you ignored it then.
The North Polar Ice Cap is at least a million years old.
40% of its volume has melted in the last 40 years.
July sea ice second lowest: oldest ice begins to melt
Arctic sea ice extent averaged for July was the second lowest in the satellite record, after 2007. After a slowdown in the rate of ice loss, the old, thick ice that moved into the southern Beaufort Sea last winter is beginning to melt out.
Arctic Sea Ice News & Analysis
How old is your record? If you are using satellites then the record is 30 years old, meaning useless. If your using some other record it is probably no more then 50 or 60 years old, again useless.
You realize that in middle time period there was a green Greenland? Right? That it was warmer then then now? That we have only had about 20 years of minimal warming. something like 1/3 of a degree?
Further the poles were warmer for longer from 1920's to late 1940's. And no I am not going to link it, it was extensively linked too in several threads YOU participated in and you ignored it then.
Have you ever been to Greenland?
Greenland's ice cap is hundreds of thousands of years old and unchanged. The area you are speaking of is a few acres.
Greenland was never green all over the country. That is a made up myth.