GHCN data is not what it once was!

Discussion in 'Environment' started by westwall, Aug 6, 2010.

  1. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,954
    Thanks Received:
    7,974
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,710
    A new paper by Dr. Ross mcKitrick of the University of Guelph shows how there are now fewer weather stations being used than at any time since 1915. And unlike what the alarmists would have you believe those weather stations are STILL the primary source of temperature data being used. Not satelites (which BTW confirm the planet is not warming). But I'll let you read the whole report and make up your own minds!

    http://rossmckitrick.weebly.com/uploads/4/8/0/8/4808045/surfacetempreview.pdf
     
  2. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,192
    Thanks Received:
    1,070
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,441
    wow!!!

    I had not read any of the leaked emails before. the one on page 42 of the pdf is really astounding. especially given the context of the paper. hard to believe Mann and Jones were found 'unguilty' of skulduggery. oh wait, they were the jury.
     
  3. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    40,954
    Thanks Received:
    7,974
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,710



    Hello Ian,

    Yes that is the reason we keep harping about raw data. There is very little and what there is is constantly being massaged or worse. This is why the climatologists have lost their credibility.
     

Share This Page